Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Life ; 17(3): 286-291, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044923

RESUMEN

Our study aimed to assess the effect of weekend versus weekday hospital admissions on all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2020, identifying patients with co-existing AMI and COVID-19 admitted on weekdays and weekends. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were assessed. A multivariable regression analysis was conducted, adjusting for confounders to determine the odds of all-cause mortality. Among 74,820 patients, 55,145 (73.7%) were admitted on weekdays, while 19,675 (26.3%) were admitted on weekends. Weekend admissions showed slightly higher proportions of men (61.3% vs. 60%) and whites (56.3% vs. 54.9%) with a median age of 73 years (range: 62-82). The overall all-cause mortality had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92-1.09; P = 0.934). After adjusting for covariates, there was no significant associations between mortality and hospital type (rural: OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.78-1.39; P = 0.789; urban teaching: OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.14; P = 0.450) or geographic region (Northeast: OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.96-1.39; P = 0.12; Midwest: OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.17; P = 0.871; South: OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.12; P = 0.697; West: OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.15; P = 0.554). There was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality among patients admitted for AMI and COVID-19 between weekdays and weekends.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , SARS-CoV-2 , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
J Arrhythm ; 40(2): 214-221, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38586846

RESUMEN

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence has become common in patients who have undergone catheter ablation. High neutrophil lymphocyte ratios (NLR) have been linked to an increased risk of recurrent AF. The research is, however, not conclusive. This meta-analysis addressed the value of easily accessible and affordable pre- and postablation NLR levels as indicators of AF recurrence in patients who had undergone ablation. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar for pertinent studies through May 2023. Using random effects models, the aggregated odds ratio (OR) of pre- and post-NLR and AF recurrence was estimated. Inter-study heterogeneity was described using I 2 statistics and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. A p-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. The literature search yielded 270 studies, seven of which were included in this meta-analysis of 1923 patients who experienced AF recurrence after undergoing ablation. There are five retrospective and two prospective studies with a mean follow-up of 20.5 months. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of AF recurrence for preablation NLR was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.04-1.71, p < .01, I 2 = 95.49%), while the adjusted OR was 1.45 (95% CI: 0.87-2.43, p < .01, I 2 = 95.1%). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for postablation NLR was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.09-1.36, p < .01, I 2 = 85.9%), and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.28 (95% CI: 0.93-1.76), demonstrating significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 95.32%) with a p-value < .01. NLR was significantly associated with AF recurrence prediction. To detect AF recurrence, we recommend that clinicians add a simple NLR blood test to their diagnostic modalities.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA