RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive retinal degenerative disease that is implicated as one of the leading causes of visual impairment in the elderly population. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been identified as the main driver of AMD, and various therapeutics have revolutionized the treatment and management of neovascular AMD (nAMD) with favorable visual and anatomical outcomes. AREAS COVERED: Physicians have a variety of approved therapeutics in their arsenal for patients with varying disease progression and patient-specific needs, with the ultimate goal of achieving optimal visual and anatomic outcomes. The literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and sources from companies' websites, allowing us to locate findings recently presented at conferences. EXPERT OPINION: Scientific advancements in the field have led to newly approved therapeutics and devices, such as the port-delivery system with ranibizumab (PDS), and further investigation is ongoing in the realm of gene therapy for retinal diseases. In addition to efficacy and durability, newer agents must have comparable safety profiles to older agents in order to be used broadly. These options introduce a level of complexity in nAMD treatment; however, physicians to personalize treatment to improve vision in nAMD patients and reduce treatment burden overall.
RESUMEN
Management of vitreoretinal disorders (e.g., neovascular age-related macular degeneration [nAMD] and diabetic macular edema [DME]) have assumed the standard therapy of lifelong anti-VEGF injections with drugs like aflibercept, brolucizumab, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. However, the burden imposed on patients is a major deterrent for continual therapy and recovery. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody, blocking both VEGF-A and Ang-2 molecules, produces a comparable functional and anatomical results, with less injections, significantly reducing patient burden. Visual acuity, safety, adverse effects, and anatomical outcomes are discussed in the pivotal clinical trials (YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE), and early data from real-world studies (TRUCKEE, TAHOE, FARWIDE-DME, FARETINA and others). In YOSEMITE and RHINE, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains, better anatomical outcomes compared to aflibercept every 8 weeks. Faricimab in the personalized treatment interval (PTI), after week 96, achieved 12-week interval in 78.1% of the patients and 16-week interval in 62.3%. TENAYA and LUCERNE reported comparable best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and better anatomic outcomes during head-to-head phase, parallel to aflibercept, at its 8-week treatment schedule. Faricimab in the PTI regimen, after week 96 achieved 12-week interval in 77.8% of the patients and 16-week interval in 63.1%. Safety of faricimab has been comparable to aflibercept in these pivotal trials. Real-world data supports the data from the pivotal studies regarding the efficacy and safety profile of faricimab in heterogenous real world patient population. Moreover, in previously treated patients, it also demonstrated a faster fluid resolution, good safety profile. Considering faricimab has demonstrated anatomic and durability benefit in the treatment of nAMD and DME, additional data from ongoing extension clinical trials, AVONELLE-X and RHONE-X will help understand longer term outcomes for patients treated with faricimab as well as patients switching from aflibercept to faricimab after finishing the pivotal trials. Longer term data from the real-world studies will also continue to contribute to our understanding of long-term efficacy, safety and durability in the real world patient population.