RESUMEN
Objective: To determine the negative predictive value of ultrasound for breast masses with probably benign morphology, and to assess whether follow-up may be an acceptable alternative to biopsy. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, all solid breast masses categorized as probably benign (American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] 3) on ultrasound from January 2014 to December 2015, and having either tissue diagnosis or imaging stability for 24 months, or downgrading to BIRADS 2 during imaging surveillance were included. Result: A total of 157 lesions in 40 patients constituted the study population. The mean patient age was 31.3 years (range, 20-56 years). Seventeen of these 157 lesions underwent tissue diagnosis with no invasive breast cancer. Out of the remaining 140 lesions, 115 were stable on imaging for 24 months or more. The rest 25 were deemed benign because of decrease in size on follow up (n=1), non-recommendation of further imaging by the second radiologist on follow up ultrasound (n= 13) or presence of benign tissue diagnosis in the largest lesion (n=11). Conclusion: Ultrasound has 100% negative predictive value for breast lesions with probably benign morphology, whether palpable or not. Follow up is an appropriate option to immediate biopsy of such lesions keeping in mind that noncompliance with surveillance may be a potential problem.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Mama/patología , Adulto , Biopsia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Scar endometriosis is an uncommon but well-described condition. It is caused by the dissemination of endometrial tissue in the wound at the time of surgery. The deposits can involve uterine scar, abdominal musculature or subcutaneous tissue, with the latter being the most common. It usually presents as a palpable mass at the scar site with or without cyclical pain. We report three cases of scar endometriosis which presented with cyclical pain and swelling at the abdominal wall scar following uterine surgery. The patients underwent imaging which revealed abnormal findings at the scar site suggesting scar endometriosis. In the presence of strong clinical suspicion and supportive imaging, all three of them underwent local excision of the lesion. The diagnosis of endometriosis was confirmed on histopathology.