RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Utility, a major principle for allocation in the context of transplantation, is questioned in patients with acute-on chronic liver failure grade 3 (ACLF-3) who undergo liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to explore long-term outcomes of patients included in a three-centre retrospective French study published in 2017. METHOD: All patients with ACLF-3 (n = 73), as well as their transplanted matched controls with ACLF-2 (n = 145), 1 (n = 119) and no ACLF (n = 292), who participated in the Princeps study published in 2017 were included. We explored 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival rates, causes of death and their predictive factors. RESULTS: Median follow-up of patients with ACLF-3 was 7.5 years. At LT, median MELD was 40. In patients with ACLF-3, 2, 1 and no ACLF, 5-year patient survival rates were 72.6% vs. 69.7% vs. 76.4% vs. 77.0%, respectively (p = 0.31). Ten-year patient survival for ACLF-3 was 56.8% and was not different to other groups (p = 0.37). Leading causes of death in patients with ACLF-3 were infections (33.3%) and cardiovascular events (23.3%). After exclusion of early death, UCLA futility risk score, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index and CLIF-C ACLF score were independently associated with 10-year patient survival. Long-term graft survival rates were not different across the groups. Clinical frailty scale and WHO performance status improved over time in patients alive after 5 years. CONCLUSION: 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival rates were not different in patients with ACLF-3 compared to matched controls. 5-year patient survival is higher than the 50%-70% threshold defining the utility of a liver graft. Efforts should focus on candidate selection based on comorbidities, as well as the prevention of infection and cardiovascular events. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: While short-term outcomes following liver transplantation in the most severely ill patients with cirrhosis (acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3 [ACLF-3]) are known, long-term data are limited, raising questions about the utility of graft allocation in the context of scarce medical resources. This study provides a favourable long-term update, confirming no differences in 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival following liver transplantation in patients with ACLF-3 compared to matched patients with ACLF-2, ACLF-1, and no-ACLF. The study highlights the risk of dying from infection and cardiovascular causes in the long-term and identifies scores including comorbidity evaluation, such as the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, as independently associated with long-term survival. Therefore, physicians should consider the cumulative burden of comorbidities when deciding whether to transplant these patients. Additionally, after transplantation, the study encourages mitigating infectious risk with tailored immunosuppressive regimens and tightly managing cardiovascular risk over time.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Severe alcohol-related hepatitis (AH) is associated with an increased risk of infection, but the impact of pneumonia has not been specifically analyzed in a specific cohort. METHODS: All patients admitted for severe AH between 2002 and 2020 were prospectively included. Systematic screening for infection was performed at admission and renewed in the case of clinical suspicion. RESULTS: We included 614 patients (60.4% men, mean age 49.9 years, median model for end-stage liver disease [MELD] 25.2, bilirubin 18.1 mg/dL), 202 (32.9%) with infections at admission (73 lung infections). Encephalopathy ( P = 0.006), MELD score ( P = 0.0002), and tobacco exposure (past vs never smokers: P = 0.002 or active vs past smokers: P = 0.005) were associated with lung infection at admission on multivariate analysis. Factors independently associated with death before steroid initiation were encephalopathy ( P = 0.003), MELD score ( P = 0.05), and especially lung infection ( P < 0.0001). Thus, patients with a lung infection had a lower probability of receiving steroids than those with other infections and noninfected patients: 54.8 vs 88.4 vs 98.1% ( P < 0.0001). One hundred forty-six of the 558 patients who received corticosteroids developed infection, including 57 (39.04%) pneumonias. The risk of respiratory and nonrespiratory infection was higher in nonresponders to steroids (Lille score ≥0.45) than in responders: 13% vs 7.6%, P = 0.03 and 27.9% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001, respectively. The variables independently associated with 3-month mortality after steroid initiation were lung infection ( P = 0.004), nonresponse to steroids ( P < 0.0001), MELD score ( P = 0.0003), ascites ( P = 0.003), and encephalopathy ( P = 0.018), whereas nonrespiratory infections were not ( P = 0.91). DISCUSSION: Lung infection is frequent during severe AH and influences mortality at admission and after steroid initiation. These results emphasize the need for specific management of lung infection during the course of AH.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because of the extensive use of this drug, further evaluation of acute liver injury (ALI) with therapeutic doses of acetaminophen (APAP; ≤6 g/d) is required. We characterize ALI with therapeutic doses of APAP and determine the host factors associated with disease severity and the predictors of outcome. APPROACH AND RESULTS: All patients admitted with severe APAP-related ALI in our center were included from 2002 to 2019, either attributable to therapeutic doses or overdose. ALI with therapeutic doses (ALITD) was defined as APAP intake <6 g/d. Overall, 311 of 400 patients with APAP-related ALI had overdose and 89 had taken therapeutic doses. The host factors associated with ALITD were fasting ≥1 day (47.5% of ALITD patients vs. 26% in overdose; P = 0.001), excess drinking (93.3% vs. 48.5%; P < 0.0001), and repeated APAP use (4 vs. 1 day; P < 0.0001). Patients with ALITD were older (44 vs. 30.7 years; P < 0.0001) and had more severe liver injury. In the overall population, the independent predictors of disease severity were older age, longer duration of APAP, and excess drinking. Thirty-day survival was lower in ALITD than in overdose (87.2 ± 3.6% vs. 94.6 ± 1.3%; P = 0.02). Age and the presence of at least one of the King's College Hospital criteria were independent predictors of 30-day survival whereas the pattern of drug intoxication, excess drinking, and bilirubin were not. CONCLUSIONS: ALI with therapeutic doses of APAP is associated with more severe liver injury than overdose. It only occurs in patients with excess drinking and/or fasting. A warning should be issued about the repeated use of nontoxic doses of APAP in patients with those risk factors.

Asunto(s)