Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Catheter. cardiovasc. interv ; 52(1): 24-34, Jan.2001. tab
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1061872

RESUMEN

In-stent restenosis (ISR) when treated with balloon angioplasty (PTCA) alone, has a angiogrphic recurrence rate of 30%-85%. Ablating the hypertrophic neointimal tissue prior to PTCA is an attractive alternative, yet the late outcomes of such treatment have not been fully determined. This multicenter case control study assessed the angiographic and clinical outcomes of 157 consecutive procedures in 146 patients with ISR at nine institutions treated with either the PTCA alone (n=64)o excrimer laser assisted coronary angioplasty (ELCA, n=93) for ISR. Demographics were similar except more unstable angina at presentation in ELCA-treated patients (74.5% vs 63.5$; P=0.141). Lesions selected for ELCA were longer (16.8 +_ 11.2mm vs. 11.2+_ 8.6 mm;P < 0.001), more complex (ACC/AHA type C:35.1% vs. 13.6%;P<0.00001)...


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia por Láser , Reestenosis Coronaria , Stents
3.
American Heart Journal ; 141(4): 610-614, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1059608

RESUMEN

Background Although both percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and additional stenting can be used for the treatment for focal in-stent restenosis (ISR), no large-scale comparative data on the clinical outcomes after these interventional procedures have been reported. Methods In the current study we compared the in-hospital and long-term clinical results of PTCA alone (n = 266 patients, n = 364 lesions) versus stenting (n = 135 patients, n = 161 lesions) for the treatment of focal ISR, defined as a lesion length =5 times normal was more frequent with stent (18.5% vs 9.7%, P = .05). At 1 year the two interventional strategies had similar cumulative mortality (4.6% PTCA vs 5.1% stent, P not significant) and target lesion revascularization rate (24.6% PTCA vs 26.5% stent, P not significant). By multivariate analysis, the sole predictor of target lesion revascularization was diabetes (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence intervals 1.2-4.7, P = .01). Conclusion Repeat stenting for the treatment of focal ISR had a higher postprocedure creatine kinase myocardial band elevation rate and similar long-term clinical results compared with PTCA alone.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Reestenosis Coronaria , Stents
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA