Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141489

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52 autoantibodies are frequently used as diagnostic biomarkers for Sjogren's disease, but their clinical significance in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is not well characterised. METHODS: Patients fulfilling SLE classification criteria were studied according to their anti-Ro status. We defined Ro positivity (Ro+) as those who have either anti-Ro60 or anti-Ro52 positivity. Patient characteristics and disease outcomes, including High Disease Activity Status (HDAS) defined as an ever attainment of SLEDAI2K ≥10, adjusted mean SLEDAI (AMS), and time-adjusted mean clinical SLEDAI (excluding serologic activities) were compared using linear or logistic regressions. Furthermore, isolated or dual positivity of anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52 were studied. RESULTS: Out of 409 patients, 47.2% were Ro+. Ro+ patients were predominantly Asian, had positive dsDNA and hypocomplementemia. They showed a higher likelihood of HDAS (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.10-2.48, p= 0.015), AMS > 4 (OR 1.84, 1.18-2.88, p= 0.007), and more frequent use of glucocorticoids (OR 1.87, 1.16-3.03, p= 0.011) and immunosuppressants (OR 2.0, 1.26-3.17, p= 0.003). Additionally, 24.4% of Ro+ patients experienced sicca symptoms, and hypergammaglobulinemia was significantly more common. Multivariate analysis confirmed that Asian ethnicity, severe flares, AMS, hypocomplementemia, rheumatoid factor, proteinuria, leucopenia, and sicca symptoms were significantly linked to Ro positivity. CONCLUSION: Anti-Ro positivity is associated with higher disease activity and increased treatment needs. Ro positivity correlates with laboratory abnormalities such as hypocomplementemia and leucopenia. These findings highlight the importance of anti-Ro60/Ro52 testing in the clinical evaluation of SLE.

2.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 76(5): 720-732, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191962

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Irreversible organ damage is common in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite evidence of increased prevalence and severity of SLE in Asia Pacific, organ damage is less well studied in this region. This systematic review aims to identify predictors of organ damage in SLE in the Asia Pacific region. METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for observational studies on organ damage in adult patients with SLE in Asia Pacific from August 31, to September 5, 2022. Study selection and data extraction were completed by two independent reviewers using Covidence systematic review software. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Significant results from univariable and multivariable analyses were synthesized from included studies. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eligible studies were selected from 1999 to 2022; 22 (58%) of these reported organ damage at study enrollment and 19 (50%) reported damage accrual, as measured by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. Factors predictive of organ damage included older age, glucocorticoid use, longer disease duration, and disease activity. Lupus nephritis was a risk factor for renal and overall damage accrual. Hydroxychloroquine was protective against overall organ damage. CONCLUSION: Predictors of organ damage in SLE in Asia Pacific are similar to other regions. Although glucocorticoid use is a modifiable risk factor for organ damage, the impact of immunosuppressives and biologic therapies needs further investigation. Effective strategies in early disease are needed to minimize initial organ damage as it predicts subsequent damage accrual.

3.
Intern Med J ; 53(10): 1901-1906, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37859540

RESUMEN

In recent trials for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), belimumab (BLM), in addition to standard immunosuppression, has been shown to improve renal and nonrenal outcomes. We report our experience using BLM in three cases of refractory lupus nephritis (LN), where renal remission was not achieved using cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil and other immunosuppressive medications. In two of the three cases, BLM therapy led to a partial remission of LN, improvement in serological markers of SLE and disease activity, which permitted a reduction in prednisolone dosing. Treatment with efficacious therapies early in the course of LN is a desirable therapeutic strategy, to achieve early remission of proteinuria and curtail the development of irreversible chronic renal damage. Further studies are needed to provide information on the effectiveness of BLM for maintenance of remission, prevention of flares and monitoring for long-term complications of B-cell modulation.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Nefritis Lúpica , Humanos , Nefritis Lúpica/tratamiento farmacológico , Nefritis Lúpica/complicaciones , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 41(11): 2312-2322, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37650287

RESUMEN

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. Patients suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a multisystem and multifactorial autoimmune disease, experience a high burden of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Importantly, cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death in SLE. Very limited evidence suggests an increased proportion of autoimmune diseases such as SLE in patients with PA. However, studies evaluating the prevalence of PA in the SLE population are lacking. Despite the potential for curative or targeted treatments, guidelines for the management of hypertension in SLE do not currently recommend testing for PA. This review highlights PA as a potentially over-looked secondary cause of hypertension in SLE, and offers future directions in research to improve the detection of this highly modifiable cardiovascular risk factor in the SLE population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hiperaldosteronismo , Hipertensión , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/etiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Hiperaldosteronismo/complicaciones , Hiperaldosteronismo/diagnóstico , Hiperaldosteronismo/epidemiología
5.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 57: 152099, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36155969

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictors of serious infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Serious infections were identified in SLE patients in a prospectively-followed single centre cohort. Associations of serious infection with disease-related variables and medication use were analysed using Cox and related regression models. RESULTS: 346 patients were followed for a mean (SD) of 6.6 (3.7) years. 86 episodes of serious infection were observed, with an incidence rate of 3.8 episodes per 100 person-years. Patients who had serious infection had higher baseline SLE Damage Index (SDI) and Charlston Comorbidity Index (CCI); they were also more likely to have high disease activity status (HDAS), and higher disease activity in multiple clinical domains, higher flare rates, higher time-adjusted prednisolone dose exposure, and less time in lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS). Patients who have received cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate were more likely to have experienced serious infection. After multivariable adjustment in Cox regression analysis, cyclophosphamide, higher SDI score, and higher disease activity were associated with an increased hazard of first serious infection. History of previous serious infection conferred the highest risk. Lymphopenia was also a modest but statistically significant predictor of serious infection. CONCLUSION: History of previous serious infection was the strongest predictor of serious infection in our SLE cohort. This study also suggests that clinical factors such as damage accrual, disease activity, and choice of immunosuppressant, can each have an independent risk in predicting serious infection particularly the first episode.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Hospitalización , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA