RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate prescribing practices are imperative to ensure adequate pain control, without excess opioid dispensing across colorectal patients. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Kentucky All Scheduled Prescription Electronic Reporting, and patient charts were queried to complete a retrospective study of elective colorectal resections, performed by a fellowship-trained colorectal surgeon, from January 2013 to December 2020. Opioid use at 14 d and 30 d posthospital discharge converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were analyzed and compared across preadmission and inpatient factors. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred twenty seven colorectal surgeries including 56.1% (N = 800) partial colectomy, 24.1% (N = 344) low anterior resection, 8.3% (N = 119) abdominoperineal resection, 8.4% (N = 121) sub/total colectomy, and 3.0% (N = 43) total proctocolectomy. Abdominoperineal resection and sub/total colectomy patients had higher 30-day postdischarge MMEs (P < 0.001, P = 0.041). An operative approach did not affect postdischarge MMEs (P = 0.440). Trans abdominal plane blocks do not predict postdischarge MMEs (0.616). Epidural usage provides a 15% increase in postdischarge MMEs (P = 0.020). Age (P < 0.001), smoking (P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.006, < 0.001), dyspnea (P = 0.001, < 0.001), albumin < 3.5 (P = 0.085, 0.010), disseminated cancer (P = 0.018, 0.001), and preadmission MMEs (P < 0.001) predict elevated 14-day and 30-day postdischarge MMEs. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that perioperative analgesic procedures, as enhanced recovery pathway suggests, are neither predictive nor protective of postoperative discharge MMEs in colorectal surgery. Provider should account for preoperative risk factors when prescribing discharge opioid medications. Furthermore, providers should identify appropriate adjunct procedures to improve discharge opioid prescription stewardship.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We determined the usefulness of ultrasound compared to cross-sectional imaging in the detection of intra-abdominal recurrences after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 800 patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma who had undergone radical or partial nephrectomy between 2008 and 2015. Patients had at minimum 1 year of followup at our institution, at least 1 ultrasound during surveillance and no metastases at time of surgery. Our primary outcome was the rate of diagnosis of abdominal recurrence based on modality of surveillance. RESULTS: Median followup for the entire cohort was 37.5 months (range 12 to 166). Overall 396 and 404 patients underwent radical and partial nephrectomy, respectively, for localized renal cell carcinoma. There were 224 (57%) and 234 (58%) patients in the radical and partial nephrectomy cohorts, respectively, who had 2 or more ultrasounds performed during surveillance. In the radical and partial nephrectomy cohorts a total of 149 (19%) abdominal recurrences were detected, with only 8 (19%) initially detected by ultrasound. On the other hand, 15 (10%) recurrences were missed by a prior negative ultrasound. Furthermore, there were 8 false-positive ultrasound studies that cross-sectional imaging later ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: The low yield of ultrasound in the detection of abdominal recurrences after radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma raises questions as to its usefulness in routine surveillance.