RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second highest cause of cancer mortality in Australia. Despite advances in colorectal surgery, anastomotic leak still occurs in low-risk patients and is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality. Many operative strategies are used to assess anastomotic integrity such as an air leak test or intraoperative flexible sigmoidoscopy, however an objective anastomotic checklist is yet to be developed and studied. This study aims to develop a photodocumentary anastomotic specific checklist and determine its feasibility for implementation. METHODS: Patients undergoing left sided colorectal resections with primary anastomosis without a de-functioning ileostomy were prospectively included between May 2021 and December 2022. A photographic checklist assessing anastomotic perfusion, integrity via either air test or endoscopic image, evidence of complete operative doughnut specimens and the assessment of tension was implemented. The feasibility of an anastomotic checklist was externally validated by four independent colorectal surgeons from Australia, New Zealand and United States of America. RESULTS: The anastomotic checklist was completed in 44 patients. Mean age was 62 years, with 43% male and mean BMI 28. Operations included high anterior resection (45%), low anterior resection (18%), ultra-low anterior resection (20%), reversal of Hartmann's (11%). Median length of stay was 4 days. Complications post operatively were documented in six patients with anastomotic leak in 2% and wound infection in 6.8%. Intraclass correlation coefficients were poor amongst all reviewers with air leak and tension having no inter-reviewer correlation. CONCLUSION: The introduction of an anastomotic checklist was a feasible tool to systematically assess and document anastomotic integrity. Unfortunately, with the small sample size there was significant discrepancy in inter-observer variability, and this led to poor correlation regarding which patients were typically high risk requiring a temporary ileostomy. Larger studies on the implementation of an anastomotic checklist will be needed to evaluate if it is an inherently feasible approach and if there is an effect on anastomotic leak.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over 42 000 Australians live with a stoma, and this number increases annually. Pregnancy in stoma patients is a rare but complex condition and there is limited published literature regarding surgical and obstetric complications in pregnant stoma patients. The aim of this paper was to review stoma outcomes, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and early postpartum period in pregnant stoma patients. METHODS: Data was retrospectively obtained on women of childbearing age, with a stoma, who had been pregnant and birthed in the last nine years at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital between January 2014 to December 2022. Data recorded included patient demographics, type of stoma, indication for stoma, need for additional abdominal surgeries, method of conception, pregnancy complications, length of stay, neonatal outcomes and post pregnancy stomal complications. RESULTS: In total, there were 16 births from 13 mothers with stomas. Of 10 births to IBD patients, 40% experienced a serious stomal complication. Caesarean section (CS) rate was 90% for IBD and 83% for non-IBD. In-vitro fertilisation rates were 40% in IBD patients and 0% in non-IBD patients. The average gestational age at delivery was 36 weeks in IBD and 35 weeks non-IBD patients. Neonates delivered to IBD mothers had a birth weight under 2500g in 40% of cases and in non IBD mothers at 33.3% (p = 0.62). Of the sixteen births there was five complications (31.25%) associated with the stoma either during pregnancy or during the sixty-day postpartum period. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy in stoma patients is a rare occurrence and appears to be associated with high rates of CS, preterm delivery, low birth weight and stomal complication.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injuries account for up to 50% of trauma related deaths and if surgical intervention is indicated, consensus suggests a maximum of 4 hours to surgical decompression. The occurrence and outcomes of craniotomies performed by non-neurosurgeons in regional Queensland hospitals have never been reported previously in the literature. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at all regional Queensland hospitals without an on-site neurosurgical service from January 2001 to December 2022 to identify patients undergoing emergency craniotomy. Data recorded included basic demographics, history of anti-coagulant use, mechanism of injury, type of haemorrhage, Glasgow Coma Score and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) on discharge. Radiological parameters measured included midline shift and maximal coronal depth of haematoma. The primary aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent a craniotomy performed by general surgeons. RESULTS: Over the past 20 years there have been 23 emergency decompressive procedures (one excluded) performed in regional Queensland. Preoperative imaging demonstrated 9 extradural haematomas and 13 subdural haematomas. Six of 17 transferred cases required reoperation after transfer to a neurosurgical centre. Survival was observed in 9 of 22 cases, with 'good' functional outcome (GOS ≥3) observed in 7 cases. In no cases were rurally performed burr holes effective. DISCUSSION: Qualitatively, a larger craniotomy may be associated with better clinical and radiological outcomes. Although rare occurrences, our results demonstrate that general surgeon performed craniotomies are frequently efficacious in producing radiological and/or clinical improvement and should be considered as a potentially lifesaving procedure.