Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hosp Med ; 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors are a leading cause of patient harm. In 2022, the Leapfrog Group published a report containing 29 evidence-based practices that hospitals can adopt to reduce diagnostic errors. OBJECTIVES: To understand the extent to which US hospitals have already implemented these practices, we conducted a national pilot survey of Leapfrog-participating hospitals. METHODS: To reduce respondent burden, we divided the 29 practices across two surveys: one focused on organizational culture and structure (Domain 1), and the second focused on the diagnostic process itself (Domain 2). RESULTS: A total of 95 hospitals from 23 states responded to one or both surveys. On average, hospitals reported implementing 9 of the 16 practices (56%) in Domain 1 and 8 of the 13 practices (62%) in Domain 2. The rate of practice implementation varied greatly, with some hospitals implementing as few as three practices in their domain. The most commonly implemented practices were ensuring access to medical interpreters, continuous access to radiologists, ensuring staff and patients can report diagnostic errors and concerns, and having a formal process to identify and notify patients when diagnostic errors occur. The least implemented practices included convening a multidisciplinary team focused on diagnostic safety and quality, a CEO commitment to diagnostic excellence, conducting diagnosis-focused risk assessments, and training clinicians to optimize clinical reasoning in the diagnostic process. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest large and important implementation gaps for practices related to diagnostic excellence and can inform new initiatives to promote diagnostic excellence in US hospitals.

3.
J Healthc Qual ; 34(1): 6-15, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22060764

RESUMEN

A comprehensive perinatal safety initiative (PSI) was incrementally introduced from August 2007 to July 2009 at a large tertiary medical center to reduce adverse obstetrical outcomes. The PSI introduced: (1) evidence-based protocols, (2) formalized team training with emphasis on communication, (3) standardization of electronic fetal monitoring with required documentation of competence, (4) a high-risk obstetrical emergency simulation program, and (5) dissemination of an integrated educational program among all healthcare providers. Eleven adverse outcome measures were followed prospectively via modification of the Adverse Outcome Index (MAOI). Additionally, individual components were evaluated. The logistic regression model found that within the first year, the MAOI decreased significantly to 0.8% from 2% (p<.0004) and was maintained throughout the 2-year period. Significant decreases over time for rates of return to the operating room (p<.018) and birth trauma (p<.0022) were also found. Finally, significant improvements were found in staff perceptions of safety (p<.0001), in patient perceptions of whether staff worked together (p<.028), in the management (p<.002), and documentation (p<.0001) of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings, and the documentation of obstetric hemorrhage (p<.019). This study demonstrates that a comprehensive PSI can significantly reduce adverse obstetric outcomes, thereby improving patient safety and enhancing staff and patient experiences.


Asunto(s)
Seguridad del Paciente , Atención Perinatal/normas , Personal de Hospital/educación , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/educación , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Femenino , Monitoreo Fetal/métodos , Monitoreo Fetal/normas , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal/fisiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Perinatal/métodos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 193(5): 1835-41, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16260245

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine why residents choose obstetrics and gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: Applicants to obstetrics and gynecology residency programs were surveyed; a 5-point scale (5 = most important) was used to rate various aspects of the specialty. Univariate statistics were performed. Bivariate analysis comparing results that were based on gender and timing of decisions was completed with Student t test, chi2, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: A total of 153 applicants (42% response rate) from 10 programs participated; 85.3% of respondents were female. Surgical opportunities, variety of clinical experience, and fast-paced/high-acuity experiences attract applicants to obstetrics and gynecology. When considering programs, resident camaraderie, gynecologic experience, and commitment to education were most important. Over 70% of residents decided to pursue obstetrics and gynecology during or after their third-year clerkship. CONCLUSION: Surgical opportunities and clinical variety appeal to applicants. The majority choose obstetrics and gynecology during or after their core clerkship. In addition, program dynamics are important when choosing a residency.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Ginecología/educación , Internado y Residencia , Motivación , Obstetricia/educación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA