RESUMEN
PURPOSE: After cochlear implantation (CI), long-term follow-up is obligatory. Remote-care options which provide a standard of care comparable to in-person consultations, could be an attractive addition to a cochlear implant centre's portfolio. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of photographs of the skin covering the implant to reliably detect skin irritations or soft tissue complications. METHODS: During routine follow-up consultations, 109 CI patients were examined in person and asked to take a photograph of the skin covering the implant using their smartphones. Photographs were digitally and remotely evaluated by two CI physicians who were blinded to the findings during the in-person examination. RESULTS: In nine cases, skin abnormalities were detected by the CI physician upon in-person examination, seven of which required immediate treatment. Both digital evaluators reliably detected all treatment-requiring conditions. Overall, more skin irritations were suspected digitally compared to in-person examination. Without additional information from the patients' medical record, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 63%; with additional information provided, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity increased to 65.3%. CONCLUSION: Digital photographic assessment of the skin covering the implant is a highly sensitive method to detect skin irritations and could reduce the number of necessary in-person consultations.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Implantación Coclear/efectos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , FotograbarRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although modern cochlear implants (CIs) are approved for magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) adverse events still occur with unacceptable frequency. Methods: In this retrospective study, magnet displacement due to MRIs was analysed. Relevant factors e.g. symptoms during MRI, diagnostics, surgical intervention following the diagnosis and possible subsequent damage were assessed. RESULTS: 16 patients were enclosed. All patients complained about pain while the scan was conducted. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the temporal bone or X-rays of the skull were performed to confirm diagnosis. Artefacts on CT scans delayed immediate diagnosis in some cases. DISCUSSION: Despite various studies demonstrating the range of adverse events related to CIs following MRI, little information is available on diagnosis and radiologic recognition of magnet dislocation. In patients complaining about pain following an MRI scan an X-ray of the head should be performed immediately. Most adverse events occur in radiological centres without expertise in cochlear implants. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive training of patients, surgeons and radiologists is the most efficient tool to prevent damage to the CI and the patient. X-ray of the skull is suggested to be used as the method of choice in imaging.