RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction Cochlear implantation is an effective treatment method for severe to profound hearing loss. Many factors that may influence cochlear implantation success have been explained in previous studies. Apart from those, minor differences in size of normal cochlear nerves may affect postoperative performance. Objective To investigate whether the minor differences in cochlear nerve size in normal cochlear nerves affect postoperative cochlear implant performance. Methods 30 pediatric prelingually deaf patients who were treated with cochlear implantation were included in this study. From the reconstructed parasagittal magnetic resonance images, the diameter and cross-sectional area of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral and contralateral side were measured. Auditory evaluations were performed 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the first fitting. All the analysis was performed by using EARS®, evaluation of auditory responses to speech tool. Correlation between cochlear nerve diameter, cross-sectional area and postoperative auditory perception was analyzed to determine whether variation in cochlear nerve size contributes to postoperative auditory performance. Results The mean diameter of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral side was 718.4 μm (504.5 − 904.3 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.015 cm2 (0.012 − 0.018 cm2). On the contralateral side the mean cochlear nerve diameter was 714.4 μm (502.6 − 951.4 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.014 cm2 (0.011 − 0.019 cm2). The correlation between the diameter and cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear nerve revealed no significance. Mean score at first month monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, MTP1, was 0.17 (0.08 − 0.33), at 6th month with 6 words test, 6th month MTP6 was 0.72 (0.39 − 1.0), at 6th month with 12 words, 6th month MTP 12 was 0.46 (0.17 − 0.75) and at 12th month with 12 words, 12th month MTP12 was 0.73 (0.25 − 1.0). There was no correlation between the monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, values at any time with the diameter of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. However, the first month MTP, 6th month MTP6 and 12th month MTP12 correlated with the cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. Conclusion Measuring the cross sectional area of the normal- appearing cochlear nerve may give important prognostic knowledge on cochlear implant outcomes. In patients with a larger cross sectional area the auditory performance was better and faster. Although normal appearing, slight differences on cross sectional area of the cochlear nerve may affect performance. Measuring the size of the cochlear nerve on parasagittal magnetic resonance images may provide beneficial information on the postoperative rehabilitation process.

---

Resumo Introdução O implante coclear é um método de tratamento eficaz para a perda auditiva grave a profunda. Muitos fatores que podem influenciar o sucesso do implante coclear foram explicados em estudos anteriores. Além desses fatores, pequenas diferenças no tamanho dos nervos cocleares normais podem afetar o desempenho pós-operatório. Objetivo Investigar se pequenas diferenças no tamanho dos nervos cocleares normais afetam o desempenho pós-operatório do implante coclear. Método Foram incluídos neste estudo 30 pacientes pediátricos surdos pré-linguais, tratados com implante coclear. A partir de imagens de ressonância magnética parassagitais reconstruídas, foram medidos o diâmetro e a área de seção transversal do nervo coclear no lado ipsilateral e contralateral. As avaliações auditivas foram feitas 1, 3, 6 e 12 meses após a primeira adaptação. Todas as análises foram feitas com a ferramenta EARS® (do inglês evaluation of auditory responses to speech). A correlação entre o diâmetro do nervo coclear, a área transversal e a percepção auditiva pós-operatória foi analisada para determinar se a variação no tamanho do nervo coclear contribui para o desempenho auditivo pós-operatório. Resultados O diâmetro médio do nervo coclear no lado ipsilateral foi de 718,4 μm (504,5 a 904,3 μm) e a área da seção transversal média foi de 0,015 cm2 (0,012-0,018 cm2). No lado contralateral, o diâmetro médio do nervo coclear foi de 714,4 μm (502,6 a 951,4 μm) e a área da seção transversal média foi de 0,014 cm2 (0,011 a 0,019 cm2). A correlação entre o diâmetro e a área transversal do nervo coclear ipsilateral e contralateral não revelou qualquer significância. O escore médio do teste monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable no primeiro mês, denominado MTP1, foi de 0,17 (0,08-0,33), no sexto mês com teste de 6 palavras, MTP6, foi de 0,72 (0,39-1,0), no sexto mês com 12 palavras, MTP12, foi de 0,46 (0,17-0,75) e no 12° mês com 12 palavras, MTP12, foi de 0,73 (0,25-1,0). Não houve correlação entre os valores do teste monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable em qualquer momento com o diâmetro do nervo coclear ipsilateral. Entretanto, o teste monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable do primeiro mês, do 6° mês, e o do 12° mês correlacionaram-se com a área transversal do nervo coclear ipsilateral. Conclusão Medir a área da secção transversal do nervo coclear de aparência normal pode fornecer conhecimento prognóstico importante sobre os resultados do implante coclear. Em pacientes com área da secção transversal maior, o desempenho auditivo foi melhor e mais rápido. Embora o nervo coclear pareça normal, pequenas diferenças na área da secção transversal do nervo coclear podem afetar o desempenho, de forma que a medida do tamanho do nervo coclear nas imagens de ressonância magnética na projeção parassagital pode fornecer informações benéficas sobre o processo de reabilitação pós-operatória.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation is an effective treatment method for severe to profound hearing loss. Many factors that may influence cochlear implantation success have been explained in previous studies. Apart from those, minor differences in size of normal cochlear nerves may affect postoperative performance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the minor differences in cochlear nerve size in normal cochlear nerves affect postoperative cochlear implant performance. METHODS: 30 pediatric prelingually deaf patients who were treated with cochlear implantation were included in this study. From the reconstructed parasagittal magnetic resonance images, the diameter and cross-sectional area of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral and contralateral side were measured. Auditory evaluations were performed 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the first fitting. All the analysis was performed by using EARS®, evaluation of auditory responses to speech tool. Correlation between cochlear nerve diameter, cross-sectional area and postoperative auditory perception was analyzed to determine whether variation in cochlear nerve size contributes to postoperative auditory performance. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral side was 718.4 µm (504.5 - 904.3 µm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.015 cm2 (0.012 - 0.018 cm2). On the contralateral side the mean cochlear nerve diameter was 714.4 µm (502.6 - 951.4 µm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.014 cm2 (0.011 - 0.019 cm2). The correlation between the diameter and cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear nerve revealed no significance. Mean score at first month monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, MTP1, was 0.17 (0.08 - 0.33), at 6th month with 6 words test, 6th month MTP6 was 0.72 (0.39 - 1.0), at 6th month with 12 words, 6th month MTP 12 was 0.46 (0.17 - 0.75) and at 12th month with 12 words, 12th month MTP12 was 0.73 (0.25 - 1.0). There was no correlation between the monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, values at any time with the diameter of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. However, the first month MTP, 6th month MTP6 and 12th month MTP12 correlated with the cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. CONCLUSION: Measuring the cross sectional area of the normal- appearing cochlear nerve may give important prognostic knowledge on cochlear implant outcomes. In patients with a larger cross sectional area the auditory performance was better and faster. Although normal appearing, slight differences on cross sectional area of the cochlear nerve may affect performance. Measuring the size of the cochlear nerve on parasagittal magnetic resonance images may provide beneficial information on the postoperative rehabilitation process.

Asunto(s)

Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Sordera , Percepción del Habla , Niño , Nervio Coclear , Sordera/rehabilitación , Sordera/cirugía , Humanos , Percepción del Habla/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento