RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quality clinical environments are crucial in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills. This study explored the mediating role of academic burnout in relation to workplace bullying experience, stress hardiness, and occupational identity among nursing students during clinical practice. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire was administered to fourth-year nursing students from four universities. Data were collected in March 2023 and analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and PROCESS Macro Model 4. RESULTS: In the final sample (N = 202), the correlates of occupational identity were stress hardiness and academic burnout; workplace bullying was not statistically significant. Academic burnout completely and partially mediated the relationship between workplace bullying and occupational identity and between stress hardiness and occupational identity, respectively. CONCLUSION: To strengthen nursing students' occupational identity, active attention and management are required to prevent academic burnout and improve stress hardiness. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(9):604-612.].
Asunto(s)
Acoso Escolar , Agotamiento Profesional , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Acoso Escolar/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto Joven , Bachillerato en Enfermería , Adulto , Identificación SocialRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to adapt, modify, and validate the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDM©) for Korean nursing students. METHODS: Participants were 183 nursing students with clinical practice experience in two nursing colleges. The construct validity and reliability of the final Korean version of the NASC-CDM© were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and testing of internal consistency reliability. For adaptation and modification, the instrument was translated from English to Korean. Expert review and a cross-sectional survey were used to test the instrument's validity. RESULTS: The Korean version of the NASC-CDM© (KNASC-CDM) was composed of 23 items divided into four dimensions: (i) Listening fully and using resources to gather information; (ii) Using information to see the big picture; (iii) Knowing and acting; and (iv) Seeking information from clinical instructors. The instrument explained 60.1% of the total variance for self-confidence and 63.1% of the variance for anxiety; Cronbach's α was .93 for self-confidence and .95 for anxiety. CONCLUSION: The KNASC-CDM can be used to identify anxiety and self-confidence in nursing students' clinical decision-making in Korea. However, further research should be done to test this instrument, as it is classified differently from the original NASC-CDM© version.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Autoimagen , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , República de Corea , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducción , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Student self-debriefing promotes self-confidence, helps to increase clinical performance, and is a more cost-effective method than is traditional instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based learning. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the effectiveness of debriefing-in terms of the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction-between an experimental group who received both student self-debriefing (SSD) and instructor debriefing (ID) and a control group who received only instructor debriefing. DESIGN: This quasi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. SETTINGS: Two universities in South Korea. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 123 senior nursing students. The data were collected between 15 April and 9 June 2016. METHODS: Differences in the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction between the SSDâ¯+â¯ID group and the ID-only group were measured. RESULTS: The SSDâ¯+â¯ID group showed significant improvements in the problem-solving process (tâ¯=â¯4.32, pâ¯<â¯.001) and debriefing satisfaction (tâ¯=â¯3.19, pâ¯=â¯.002), but not in debriefing assessment (tâ¯=â¯1.67, pâ¯=â¯.097) or team effectiveness (tâ¯=â¯1.84, pâ¯=â¯.069) compared to ID-only group. Specifically, as the number of student sessions increased, we observed significant differences in problem-solving ability (Fâ¯=â¯9.44, pâ¯<â¯.001), debriefing satisfaction (Fâ¯=â¯7.78, pâ¯<â¯.001), and the subdomains of debriefing assessment: 'maintains an engaging environment' (Fâ¯=â¯3.78, pâ¯=â¯.025), 'structures the debriefing in an organized way' (Fâ¯=â¯4.27, pâ¯=â¯.016), and 'helps trainees achieve or sustain future performance' (Fâ¯=â¯3.17, pâ¯=â¯.045). CONCLUSIONS: Our results can be used to develop guidelines for effective debriefing following simulation in nursing education. Specifically, combining SSD and ID in simulation debriefing and increasing the number of SSD sessions could help improve the problem-solving process and debriefing satisfaction among nursing students.
Asunto(s)
Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Bachillerato en Enfermería/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , República de Corea , Autoeficacia , Universidades/organización & administración , Recursos Humanos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the degree and influencing factors of musculoskeletal disease symptoms among care workers in long-term care facilities in South Korea. METHODS: Participants in this cross-sectional study were 265 care workers in 15 long-term care facilities. Data were collected between 1 and 27 August 2011, using the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) code H-30-2003 and analyzed using logistic regression with SPSS ver. 18.0. RESULTS: Of the care workers, 88.7% had pain in at least one of the six body parts. The highest prevalence of musculoskeletal disease symptoms was in the lower back and legs. Among the organizational factors, there were significant differences in neck pain by work shift and patient grade. Neck pain was more severe in the 8 h shift group than 12-24 h shift group. Care workers caring for patients who were classified in the first patient grade of long-term care insurance had 4.73 times more complaints of musculoskeletal symptoms in the neck, 9.54 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.37-27.02) in the hand and wrist, 4.37 times (95% CI = 1.59-12.03) in the lower back, and 2.96 times (95% CI: 1.17-7.51) in the leg and foot. CONCLUSION: To prevent and manage musculoskeletal disease symptoms, activities and the intensity of work should be arranged systematically and planned, and the improvement of organizational factors such as appropriate assignment by patients' severity is considered.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Casas de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/organización & administración , Masculino , Prevalencia , República de CoreaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Body weight, body mass index (BMI), body fat, and blood pressure are important indicators of a person's health. In this experimental study, we evaluated the effectiveness of an integrated personalized health care system, Health Improvement and Management System (HIMS)-everyday, which instantly provides subjects with biofeedback on their measured body weight, BMI, body fat and blood pressure using a database that stores subjects-customized information. METHODS: The subjects of this study used the system once or twice a week for 8 weeks. We analyzed the changes in their body weight, BMI, body fat, and blood pressure according to their respective usage of the system, and analyzed the changes in their perceived health status and health promoting behavior accordingly. RESULTS: Subjects' body weight, BMI, and blood pressure decreased significantly with respect to their individual usage of the system. Subjects who used the system more frequently showed significant improvement in their body weight, BMI, and body fat. However, subjects' perceived health status and health promoting behavior did not improve significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the biofeedback-based personalized health care system was effective in controlling middle-aged and elderly women' body weight, BMI, body fat, and blood pressure.