RESUMEN

Implant-based breast augmentation is a valuable tool for treatment of gender dysphoria in transgender women. The aim was to assess whether implant attributes, plane selection, and patient characteristics had an impact on the surgical outcome, and to compare these parameters between transgender and cisgender breast augmentations. Methods: A cohort of transgender women who underwent breast augmentation at our department during 2009-2018 were retrospectively studied. The cohort was also compared with a cohort of 12,884 mainly cisgender women registered in the Swedish breast implant registry (BRIMP) during 2014-2019. Results: A total of 143 transgender individuals were included, with a median follow-up of 5.7 years. Complications occurred in 20 patients (14.0%), four patients (2.8%) underwent acute reoperation, and 20 patients (14.0%) had secondary corrections. No differences were seen in complication rates when comparing prepectoral with subpectoral placement (15.1% versus 12.9%; P = 0.81); size, less than 400 mL versus greater than or equal to 400 mL (14.7% versus 13.3%; P = 0.81), or the shape of the implants, round versus anatomic (10.7% versus 22.2%; P = 0.10). In comparison with the cohort from BRIMP, the transgender cohort had more round implants (72.0% versus 60.7%; P < 0.01), larger implants (44.1% had volumes of 400-599 mL, compared with 25.4%; P < 0.0001), and more prepectoral placement (51.0% versus 7.3%; P < 0.0001). The risk of reoperation less than 30 days was 1.2% in BRIMP and 2.8% in the transgender cohort (P = 0.08). Conclusions: In transgender women, implants are often larger, round, and placed prepectoral' compared with cisgender women. Despite these differences, complication rates were equivalent. Implant attributes, surgical techniques, and patient characteristics were not independently associated with the rate of complications.

RESUMEN

Autologous free tissue transfer is today an integral part of reconstructive plastic surgery, but still lacks generally accepted guidelines regarding antithrombotic agents. We hypothesized that the overuse of antithrombotic agents could be a risk factor for free flap complications and therefore studied a treatment protocol adjustment. METHODS: Consecutive free flaps between 2005 and 2020 at a single center were analyzed for complications in relation to the use of pre- and intraoperative treatment with three different antithrombotic agents. The use of preoperative low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), intraoperative heparin, and dextran were analyzed in relation to outcome variables, thromboembolic events, or reexploration for hematoma. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-one patients underwent 1000 microvascular free flaps for breast (n = 487), head and neck (n = 365), and extremity (n = 148) reconstruction. Within the first postoperative week, 44 cases had a thromboembolic event and 58 cases underwent hematoma-related reexploration. In the multivariate analysis, thromboembolic events were associated with extremity reconstruction (P = 0.02) and smoking (P = 0.02). Hematoma-related reexploration was more common with triple antithrombotic therapy compared with all other treatment regimes (P < 0.05). The number of antithrombotic agents used perioperatively was linearly decreased, from three to none, over the elapsed time period (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hematoma was the most common reason for reexploration and was further associated with the use of multiple antithrombotic agents. Cessation of triple treatment was associated with less hematomas and further reduction of antithrombotic agents did not result in any increase of thromboembolic events. Evidence-based guidelines are warranted for antithrombotic regimes in standard free flap surgery.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy and chest-wall contouring is the most common gender confirmation surgery. With increasing prevalence of transgender individuals, there is a demand for better surgical outcomes and aesthetic results. Our aim was to evaluate surgical techniques used and assess modifications in gender confirmation mastectomies at Karolinska University hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 464 patients undergoing gender confirmation mastectomies in our department between 2009 and 2018. Patient demographics, psychiatric comorbidity, surgical method, and outcome were analyzed. Follow-up was at least one year. RESULTS: The most frequently used surgical technique for gender confirmation mastectomies was double incision with free nipple graft (243 patients, 52.4%), followed by periareolar incision (113 patients, 24.4%) and semicircular incision (67 patients, 14.4%). The double incision technique and periareolar technique were associated with 18.9% and 28.3% complications, 3.3% and 12.4% acute reoperations, 28.4% and 65.5% secondary revisions, respectively. The double incision technique increased from being used in 17.8% of all mastectomies during 2009-2013 to 62.9% during 2014-2018, while periareolar incision decreased from 43.0% to 18.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The current study describes a successful transition of surgical technique from periareolar incision to double incision with free nipple graft in gender confirmation mastectomy, leading to significant improvements in the overall outcome with fewer complications, less acute reoperations and less secondary corrections. Hence, we consider the double incision with free nipple graft technique to be the favored technique in the vast majority of cases in female-to-male chest wall contouring.

RESUMEN

Background and aims: Stage II cancer of the tongue is mostly managed surgically both locally and regionally. However, indications for postoperative radiotherapy and reconstructive options vary between centers. This paper aims to describe differences in treatment in a geographically homogenous cohort.Methods: A retrospective comparison was made between two cohorts of clinical T2N0 tongue cancer from Finland and Sweden. The Finnish cohort included 75 patients and the Swedish 54. All patients had curative intent of treatment and no previous head and neck cancer. Data analyzed consisted of pathological stage, size and thickness of tumor, frequency of reconstruction, radiotherapy delivered, and survival.Results: The Finnish cohort included a higher proportion of patients managed with reconstructive surgery (67%) than the Swedish cohort (0%), p < .00001. More patients were treated with postoperative radiotherapy (84%) in the Swedish cohort than in the Finnish (54%), p < .0002. The Finnish cohort had a higher level of survival and included more frequent downstaging (cTNM to pTNM).Conclusions and significance: Our data indicate a major difference in the management of T2N0 oral tongue cancer. The optimal cut-off size and growth pattern of the tumor warranting reconstruction should be further evaluated in a prospective manner considering both survival and quality of life.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CONCLUSIONS: There is a high propensity for locoregional and isolated regional failure in stage II patients, even though treated with combined therapy. In stage I patients the risk of isolated regional failure was moderate, at levels below 10%. BACKGROUND: The neck treatment of early stages of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) are still debatable, considering that previous studies have produced diverting results. The purpose of this study is to report on the outcome of patients with stages I-II, with special respect to regional outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated for OTSCC at Karolinska University Hospital between 2008-2014 were included. Patient demographics, intention of treatment, treatment modality, time of follow-up and status at follow-up, recurrence, and place of recurrence were recorded. RESULTS: Of 230 patients, 149 presented within stages I and II. Of those, 105 were electively treated to the neck. In stage I, the risk of presence of disease in the neck specimen was four out of 63 (6%), whereas 17 out of 41 (41%) were positive in stage II patients. The overall risk of isolated regional failure at any time in stage I patients was six out of 89 and in stage II 25 out of 60.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physicians assessing chest pain patients in the emergency department (ED) base the likelihood of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mainly on ECG, symptom history and blood markers of myocardial injury. Among these, the ECG has been stated to be the most important diagnostic tool. We aimed to analyze the relative contributions of these three diagnostic modalities to the ED physicians' evaluation of ACS likelihood in clinical practice. METHODS: 1151 consecutive ED chest pain patients were prospectively included. The ED physician's subjective assessment of the patient's likelihood of ACS (obvious ACS, strong, vague or no suspicion of ACS), the symptoms and the ECG were recorded on a special form. The ED TnT value was retrieved from the medical records. Frequency tables and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the contributions of the diagnostic tests to the level of ACS suspicion. RESULTS: Symptoms determined whether the physician had any suspicion of ACS (odds ratio, OR 526 for symptoms typical compared to not suspicious of ACS) since neither ECG nor TnT contributed significantly (ORs not significantly different from 1) to this assessment. ACS was suspected in only one in ten patients with symptoms not suspicious of ACS. Symptoms were also more important (OR 620 for typical symptoms) than ECG (OR 31 for ischemic ECG) and TnT (OR 3.4 for a positive TnT) for the assessment of obvious ACS/strong suspicion versus vague/no suspicion. Of the patients with ST-elevation on ECG, 71% were considered to have an obvious ACS, as opposed to only 6% of those with symptoms typical of ACS and 10% of those with a positive TnT. CONCLUSION: The ED physicians used symptoms as the most important assessment tool and applied primarily the symptoms to determine the level of ACS suspicion and to rule out ACS. The ECG was primarily used to rule in ACS. The TnT level played a minor role for the assessment of ACS likelihood. Further studies regarding ACS prediction based on symptoms may help improve decision-making in ED patients with possible ACS.

Asunto(s)