RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) contribute calcium influx in megakaryocytic cells but their roles remain unclear; both pro- and anti-differentiating effects have been shown in different contexts. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to clarify NMDAR contribution to megakaryocytic differentiation in both normal and leukemic cells. METHODS: Meg-01, Set-2, and K-562 leukemic cell lines were differentiated using phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA, 10 nmol L-1) or valproic acid (VPA, 500 µmol L-1). Normal megakaryocytes were grown from mouse marrow-derived hematopoietic progenitors (lineage-negative and CD41a-enriched) in the presence of thrombopoietin (30-40 nmol L-1). Marrow explants were used to monitor proplatelet formation in the native bone marrow milieu. In all culture systems, NMDARs were inhibited using memantine and MK-801 (100 µmol L-1); their effects compared against appropriate controls. RESULTS: The most striking observation from our studies was that NMDAR antagonists markedly inhibited proplatelet formation in all primary cultures employed. Proplatelets were either absent (in the presence of memantine) or short, broad and intertwined (with MK-801). Earlier steps of megakaryocytic differentiation (acquisition of CD41a and nuclear ploidy) were maintained, albeit reduced. In contrast, in leukemic Meg-01 cells, NMDAR antagonists inhibited differentiation in the presence of PMA and VPA but induced differentiation when applied by themselves. CONCLUSIONS: NMDAR-mediated calcium influx is required for normal megakaryocytic differentiation, in particular proplatelet formation. However, in leukemic cells, the main NMDAR role is to inhibit differentiation, suggesting diversion of NMDAR activity to support leukemia growth. Further elucidation of the NMDAR and calcium pathways in megakaryocytic cells may suggest novel ways to modulate abnormal megakaryopoiesis.

RESUMEN

Human megakaryocytes release glutamate and express glutamate-gated Ca(2+)-permeable N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) that support megakaryocytic maturation. While deregulated glutamate pathways impact oncogenicity in some cancers, the role of glutamate and NMDARs in megakaryocytic malignancies remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if NMDARs participate in Ca(2+) responses in leukemic megakaryoblasts and if so, whether modulating NMDAR activity could influence cell growth. Three human cell lines, Meg-01, Set-2 and K-562 were used as models of leukemic megakaryoblasts. NMDAR components were examined in leukemic cells and human bone marrow, including in megakaryocytic disease. Well-established NMDAR modulators (agonists and antagonists) were employed to determine NMDAR effects on Ca(2+) flux, cell viability, proliferation and differentiation. Leukemic megakaryoblasts contained combinations of NMDAR subunits that differed from normal bone marrow and the brain. NMDAR agonists facilitated Ca(2+) entry into Meg-01 cells, amplified Ca(2+) responses to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and promoted growth of Meg-01, Set-2 and K-562 cells. Low concentrations of NMDAR inhibitors (riluzole, memantine, MK-801 and AP5; 5-100µM) were weakly cytotoxic but mainly reduced cell numbers by suppressing proliferation. The use-dependent NMDAR inhibitor, memantine (100µM), reduced numbers and proliferation of Meg-01 cells to less than 20% of controls (IC50 20µM and 36µM, respectively). In the presence of NMDAR inhibitors cells acquired morphologic and immunophenotypic features of megakaryocytic differentiation. In conclusion, NMDARs provide a novel pathway for Ca(2+) entry into leukemic megakaryoblasts that supports cell proliferation but not differentiation. NMDAR inhibitors counteract these effects, suggesting a novel opportunity to modulate growth of leukemic megakaryoblasts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We have investigated the effect of co-culture with porcine spermatozoa on in vitro maturation of porcine germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes before fertilization. Most oocytes were arrested at the first prophase of meiosis when oocytes were cultured in TCM 199 alone, but the proportion of oocytes that reached metaphase II was significantly elevated by co-incubation with spermatozoa in vitro. The oocyte maturation effect was observed with intact and parts of spermatozoa (head and tail) collected from adult swine (regardless of source). However, gonocytes from the newborn porcine testis were not able to enhance in vitro maturation of porcine germinal vesicle oocytes. Interestingly, the oocyte maturation effect by spermatozoa was not decreased with heat treatment, but the maturation effect of oocyte treatment disappeared with exposure to detergent in sperm suspension. Porcine spermatozoa were also observed to stimulate meiosis of oocytes, which was maintained at meiotic arrest using dibutyryl cyclic AMP or forskolin. The study suggests that (i) membrane of porcine spermatozoa contains a substance(s) that can enhance in vitro maturation of oocytes prior to fertilization, (ii) the putative meiosis-enhancing substance(s) of spermatozoa from adult testes retains the oocyte maturation effect during transportation of spermatozoa through epididymis, and (iii) the putative meiosis-enhancing substance(s) is able to overcome the inhibitory effect of dibutyryl cyclic AMP or forskolin by inducing germinal vesicle breakdown of porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes maintained in meiotic arrest.

Asunto(s)