RESUMEN
Objectives The objective of this study was to introduce a new system of handover in the gynaecology department and ensure its effectiveness with dynamic improvement measures. This was launched as a quality improvement project in a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. The primary aim was to start and consolidate a new system of a separate gynaecology handover in the presence of consultants, registrars (incoming and outgoing), senior house officers (incoming and outgoing) and gynaecology nurses. Design The strategy for consolidation included a daily quality review on the basis of a fixed proforma, identifying the obstacles faced, and improvising dynamic solutions. A new quality check proforma was introduced which took into account: (i) Presence of team members, (ii) Following of proper SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) format in the handover, (iii) Updating of patients awaiting surgeries with every detail on the list, (iv) Proper handing over of pending referrals, (v) Mention of sick patients with proper importance, and (vi) Proper handing over of new admissions. A pilot study was done to evaluate the baseline performance of the unit regarding the gynaecology team handover on the basis of the same proforma. The result of the baseline study was noted as the reference. Each day the team receiving the handover was interviewed for the next five months about the quality of each of the parameters on the predesigned proforma and the responses were noted. The answers were designed in binary form (Yes/No). These results were compiled at the end of each month. The result from each individual month was reviewed and the problems were identified and practical solutions were applied. These changes were noted and plotted graphically as a bar diagram. The monthly audit results were tabulated in an Excel sheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States). Results Pilot study results and final month results were compared with the help of the Mcnemar test and statistically significant improvement was noticed in seven out of eleven parameters. There was a steady and gradual improvement in the responses. The possible limitations of the study were also noted at the same time. Conclusion The quality improvement project was highly effective in improving the quality of handover and increased patient safety to a large extent.
RESUMEN
Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies are the rarest type of ectopic pregnancy. The optimum management regime is not yet established. We report the case of a 39-year-old woman who presented at 11 weeks gestation with painless vaginal bleeding, having had 2 previous caesarean sections. Ultrasound revealed a gestational sac within the caesarean scar niche. On follow-up, her serial ß human chorionic gonadotropin (ßHCG) measurements fell significantly. The woman initially opted for conservative management but subsequently required surgical management. Hysteroscopy demonstrated a sac within the caesarean scar which was successfully evacuated by ultrasound-guided suction curettage, with no complications. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies are becoming increasingly common. Diagnosis is primarily through ultrasound using specified criteria. Management may be conservative, medical or surgical excision depending on the clinical circumstances. Hysteroscopy and suction curettage is an effective therapeutic option for caesarean scar ectopic management.