RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials showed the efficacy of family therapy for anorexia nervosa during adolescence, but studies examining its long-term beneficial effect are still needed. This article presents the results of a 54-month post-randomization follow-up of a previously reported randomized controlled trial that compared two post-hospitalization outpatient treatment programs: Treatment As Usual alone versus Systemic Family Therapy added to Treatment As Usual. METHODS: A consecutive series of 60 female adolescents with anorexia nervosa (DSM-IV) were randomized (30 per group). During the first 18 months, in the Treatment As Usual group, subjects received a multidisciplinary treatment. In the other group, Systemic Family Therapy sessions targeting intra-familial dynamics were added to Treatment As Usual. At 54 months, the primary outcome was defined using the Morgan and Russell global Outcome Categories (Good or Intermediate versus Poor). Secondary outcomes were the Global Outcome Assessment Schedule score, body mass index, amenorrhea, number of hospitalizations, eating disorder symptoms, psychopathological features, and family functioning. Analyses were carried out using an Intention-To-Treat with the Last Observation Carried Forward procedure. Data of 59/60 subjects were available. RESULTS: At 54 months, significant effects in favor of adding Systemic Family Therapy to Treatment As Usual were shown for the Global Outcome Categories (60% of Good/Intermediate versus 31% in the control group, p = .026), mean body mass index (p = .048), resumption of menses (70.0% vs. 40% p = .020), and mental state score (p = .010). Family cohesion scores were lower in the Systemic Family Therapy group (p = .040). CONCLUSIONS: Adding Systemic Family Therapy focusing on intra-familial dynamics to a multidimensional outpatient treatment program appeared to lead to a better long-term outcome in young women who suffered from severe anorexia nervosa during adolescence.
Asunto(s)
Anorexia Nerviosa , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Femenino , Adolescente , Humanos , Anorexia Nerviosa/terapia , Terapia Familiar/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Atención Ambulatoria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
After publication of our article [1] the authors have notified us of missing to include one name to the authorship list.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious psychiatric illness that begins most of the time during adolescence. An early and efficacious intervention is crucial to minimize the risk of the illness becoming chronic and to limit the occurrence of comorbidities. There is a global consensus on optimal treatment for adolescents suffering from AN: international guidelines recommend single-family therapy that involves the patient and his/her family. Several family therapy approaches have been developed to date. However, these approaches, which imply a direct questioning of intrafamilial dynamics, are not suitable for all patients and families, and the rates of dropout or poor response to treatment remain quite high. A modality of family therapy has been adapted to AN, known as multi-family therapy (MFT), which consists in bringing together several families whose children suffers from the same illness. Objectives of the present randomized clinical trial are to evaluate whether the implementation of MFT in a multi-disciplinary treatment program for adolescents with AN is at least as efficacious as the use of systemic single-family therapy (SFT), with respect to the evolution of body mass index and other clinical outcomes 12 and 18 months after the start of treatment. A cost-efficiency analysis will also be conducted. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Patients and their families will receive 10 sessions of therapy spread over 12 months. Body weight, eating disorder and other psychopathology-related symptoms, quality of family relationships, and family satisfaction with treatment will be evaluated during the treatment and at an 18 months follow-up. A cost-efficiency analysis will also be carried out. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that MFT is at least as efficacious as SFT, but at a lesser cost. The identification of possible preferential indications for each technique could help the improvement of therapeutic indications for adolescents suffering from AN and contribute to the earliness of intervention, which is associated with a better outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03350594 . Registered on 22 November 2017. IDRCB number 2016-A00818-43.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Anorexia Nerviosa/terapia , Relaciones Familiares , Terapia Familiar/métodos , Conducta Alimentaria , Adolescente , Anorexia Nerviosa/diagnóstico , Anorexia Nerviosa/economía , Anorexia Nerviosa/psicología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Terapia Familiar/economía , Femenino , Francia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Research on treatments in anorexia nervosa (AN) is scarce. Although most of the therapeutic programs used in 'real world practice' in AN treatment resort to multidisciplinary approaches, they have rarely been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare two multidimensional post-hospitalization outpatients treatment programs for adolescents with severe AN: Treatment as Usual (TAU) versus this treatment plus family therapy (TAU+FT). METHOD: Sixty female AN adolescents, aged 13 to 19 years, were included in a randomized parallel controlled trial conducted from 1999 to 2002 for the recruitment, and until 2004 for the 18 months follow-up. Allocation to one of the two treatment groups (30 in each arm) was randomised. The TAU program included sessions for the patient alone as well as sessions with a psychiatrist for the patient and her parents. The TAU+FT program was identical to the usual one but also included family therapy sessions targeting intra-familial dynamics, but not eating disorder symptoms. The main Outcome Measure was the Morgan and Russell outcome category (Good or Intermediate versus Poor outcome). Secondary outcome indicators included AN symptoms or their consequences (eating symptoms, body mass index, amenorrhea, number of hospitalizations in the course of follow-up, social adjustment). The evaluators, but not participants, were blind to randomization. RESULTS: At 18 months follow-up, we found a significant group effect for the Morgan and Russell outcome category in favor of the program with family therapy (Intention-to-treat: TAU+FT :12/30 (40%); TAU : 5/29 (17.2%) pâ=â0.05; Per Protocol analysis: respectively 12/26 (46.2%); 4/27 (14.8%), pâ=â0.01). Similar group effects were observed in terms of achievement of a healthy weight (i.e., BMI≥10(th) percentile) and menstrual status. CONCLUSIONS: Adding family therapy sessions, focusing on intra-familial dynamics rather than eating symptomatology, to a multidimensional program improves treatment effectiveness in girls with severe AN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN71142875.