RESUMEN

Neck pain is a common cause of disability worldwide. Lack of objective tools to quantify an individual's functional disability results in the widespread use of subjective assessments to measure the limitations in spine function and the response to interventions. This study assessed the reliability of the quantifying neck function using a wearable cervical motion tracking system. Three novice raters recorded the neck motion assessments on 20 volunteers using the device. Kinematic features from the signals in all three anatomical planes were extracted and used as inputs to repeated measures and mixed-effects regression models to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Cervical spine-specific kinematic features indicated good and excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for the most part. For intra-rater reliability, the ICC values varied from 0.85 to 0.95, and for inter-rater reliability, they ranged from 0.7 to 0.89. Overall, velocity measures proved to be more reliable compared to other kinematic features. This technique is a trustworthy tool for evaluating neck function objectively. This study showed the potential for cervical spine-specific kinematic measurements to deliver repeatable and reliable metrics to evaluate clinical performance at any time points.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The development of pressure ulcers during aeromedical transport of combat casualties is an issue that continues to exist, especially during long transport flights. This study investigated the potential for a new intervention, an air-inflated insulating mattress pad (IMP) that has a pump system designed to alternate the pressurization of air cells under the patient, thus temporally shifting the pressure concentration locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a repeated measures design study, 12 participants experienced the following four simulated transport conditions, each for 90 minutes: (1) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) litter by itself (control condition), (2) the NATO litter covered with the standard mattress pad (Warrior Evacuation Pad), (3) the NATO litter covered with the air-inflated mattress (IMP), and (4) the NATO litter, covered with the standard mattress pad that was covered by the insulating mattress pad. Peak pressure readings were obtained every 15 seconds under the head, torso, pelvis, legs, and heels. RESULTS: While both mattress pads significantly reduced the peak pressures relative to the litter-only condition, the new IMP with the alternating cell pressurizations, by itself or in combination with the standard mattress pad, further reduced the peak pressures under the regions with the localized highest pressures, namely the head, pelvis, and heels. Moreover, the IMP with alternating pressure introduced the most variability in the peak pressure readings, which reduces the peak pressure exposure periods for specific tissue locations. CONCLUSIONS: The IMP with alternating cell pressurizations could further reduce the likelihood of pressure injuries during aeromedical transport of combat casualties.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Subjective assessments are often used to assess extent of functional limitations and treatment response. However, these measures have poor sensitivity and are influenced by the patient's perception of their condition. Currently, there are no objective tools to effectively assess the extent of an individual's functional disability and inform clinical decision-making. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a wearable motion system based on Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors for use in quantifying low back function. Methods: Low back motion assessments were conducted by 3 novice raters on 20 participants using an IMU-based motion system. These assessments were conducted over 3 days with 2 days of rest in between tests. A total of 37 kinematic parameters were extracted from the low back motion assessment in all three anatomical planes. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) calculated from repeated measures, mixed-effects regression models. Results: Lumbar spine-specific kinematic parameters showed moderate to excellent reliability across all kinematic parameters. The ICC values ranged between 0.84-0.93 for intra-rater reliability and 0.66 - 0.83 for inter-rater reliability. In particular, velocity measures showed higher reliabilities than other kinematic variables. Conclusion: The IMU-based wearable motion system is a valid and reliable tool to objectively assess low back function. This study demonstrated that lumbar spine-specific kinematic metrics have the potential to provide good, repeatable metrics to assess clinical function over time.