RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study investigates the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering potential, risk profile and success rate of a triple procedure comprising phacoemulsification, trabecular aspiration and trabectome (Microsurgical Technology, Redmond, WA, USA) for treating exfoliation glaucoma. METHODS: A total of 117 eyes of 117 patients with exfoliation glaucoma underwent a combination of phacoemulsification, trabectome and trabecular aspiration. They were followed up for up to 7 years. The success rates were designated according to criteria based on the Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study and the World Glaucoma Association guidelines: A (no resurgery); B/C (IOP < 21/18 mmHg, no resurgery, IOP reduction > 20%); D (IOP ⩽ 15 mmHg, no resurgery, IOP reduction ⩾ 40%). RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 46 months. IOP showed a 38% reduction from 24.5 ± 6.1 to 15.2 ± 3.6 mmHg (p < 0.0001). The Medication Score decreased by 23% from 2.2 ± 0.9 to 1.7 ±1.0 (p < 0.0001). The success rates were 87, 76, 74 and 38% according to criteria A, B, C and D. In eyes with an initial IOP of >30 mmHg, a 57% reduction from 34.2 ± 4.4 to 14.8 ± 3.2 mmHg (p < 0.0001) was observed, and the success rates were 91, 91, 82 and 59% for criteria A, B, C and D, respectively. DISCUSSION: We conclude that the triple procedure may effectively lower IOP in patients with exfoliation glaucoma over a mean follow-up period of 46 months without significant side effects. Therefore, the triple procedure may serve as first-line surgery for patients with exfoliation and cataract, even with a high initial IOP.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Exfoliación , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto , Facoemulsificación , Trabeculectomía , Síndrome de Exfoliación/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/cirugía , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Malla Trabecular/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We report a case of XEN45 Gel Stent removal 3 years after its implantation. The stent had degraded with a closed lumen, so a new stent was implanted. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old woman was scheduled for XEN45 Gel Stent implantation. Three years after the primary surgery and 2 years after a surgical revision, second revision surgery was required. The conjunctiva was opened, and the implanted XEN Gel Stent was stripped of the adhesive scar tissues. No aqueous humor flow was seen through the stent, and therefore, the stent was removed. The intrascleral and intracameral parts had degraded. The surface of the stent was irregular and cobbled. A part of the lumen in the middle of the stent had closed. DISCUSSION: We detected changes in the stent after its removal during the surgical revision with conjunctival opening, which is our standard approach for failed XEN Gel Stents. Most surgeons advise needling of the stent in cases of failure. However, in cases of needling, changes in the stent might not have been detected. Thus, the number of patients with similar changes as this report might be higher than the publications suggest. No unique characteristics distinguished this patient from those who had a functional XEN Gel Stent. The stent, in this case, might have been of inferior quality as an exception, or all stents might degrade over time. Therefore, gonioscopy should be performed carefully to detect any changes in the stent. In cases of suspected stent degradation, we recommend a revision surgery with conjunctival opening and removal of the stent in cases of degradation.
Asunto(s)
Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma , Glaucoma/cirugía , Falla de Prótesis , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The XEN45 Gel Stent is a flexible hydrophilic tube placed under the conjunctiva via the anterior chamber. This study investigates the IOP (intraocular pressure)-lowering potential, the risk profile, and the success rate of the XEN45 Gel Stent. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-one eyes underwent surgery. The mean follow-up time was 8.5 months. The aim of the treatment was to achieve adequate IOP reduction without medication. Therefore, all patients who did not show sufficiently reduced IOP underwent a surgical revision with opening of the conjunctiva. To determinate the success rate, we carried out two kinds of analysis: 1) the primary success rate: eyes with appropiate IOP control without medication or surgical revision, and 2) overall success rate: one surgical revision was allowed. RESULTS: Intraocular pressure was lowered from 24.3 mmHg (SD 6.6) to 16.8 mmHg (SD 7.6), and the medication score was lowered from 2.6 (SD 1.1) to 0.2 (SD 0.7). Revisional surgery was performed in 80 eyes (34%). After a first revision, intraocular pressure was lowered to 14.0 mmHg (SD 5.1), and the medication score was lowered to 0.2 (SD 0.6). The primary success rate was 66% and the overall success rate 90%. The primary success rate was higher in pseudophakic eyes (73%) than in phakic eyes (53%) or combined surgery (55%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from our data that the XEN45 Gel Stent has an IOP-lowering potential and few side-effects. Pseudophakic eyes seem to have a better primary prognosis compared to combined surgery or surgery in phakic eyes.
Asunto(s)
Cámara Anterior/cirugía , Conjuntiva/cirugía , Cirugía Filtrante/métodos , Glaucoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Stents , Estudios de Seguimiento , Geles , Alemania/epidemiología , Glaucoma/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the potential of lowering intraocular pressure in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma with combined phacoemulsification, Trabectome, and trabecular aspiration (triple procedure) compared to phacoemulsification and trabecular aspiration alone. METHODS: Using a case-matched retrospective study design, 30 patients were included into each group. The main outcome measures were the reduction of intraocular pressure and medication score at the end of follow-up. Clinical data were collected from the patients' medical records. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 15 months in both groups. Intraocular pressure decreased from 25.3 ± 6.3 mmHg to 14.4 ± 3.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001) in the triple procedure group and from 25.3 ± 4.2 mmHg to 18.1 ± 4.2 mmHg (p < 0.0001) in the control group. The medication score was lowered from 3.4 ± 1.7 to 2.1 ± 1.2 (p = 0.0017) in the triple procedure group and from 3.8 ± 1.8 to 2.3 ± 1.5 (p < 0.008) in the control group. The reduction of intraocular pressure was higher (p < 0.004) in the triple procedure group (38.4 ± 17.3 %) compared to the control group (26.8 ± 19.6 %) The reduction of the medication score did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The triple procedure is more effective in lowering intraocular pressure compared to phacoemulsification and trabecular aspiration alone in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.