RESUMEN

Objetivo. Comprobar si es posible determinar el grado de resección de macroadenomas hipofisarios en la resonancia magnética (RM) hipofisaria posquirúrgica inmediata. Material y métodos. Se revisaron las RM hipofisarias de pacientes intervenidos desde enero de 2010 hasta octubre de 2014. Se incluyeron aquellos que tenían RM diagnóstica, RM posquirúrgica inmediata y al menos un control posterior. Se comprobó si los hallazgos entre la RM posquirúrgica inmediata y las RM posteriores eran concordantes. Se excluyeron los casos sin controles evolutivos y las reintervenciones por recidivas. El grado de resección tumoral lo dividimos en grupos: resección total, resección parcial y dudoso. Los estudios se realizaron en una máquina de 1.5 Tesla siguiendo el mismo protocolo de secuencias: una parte morfológica, otra dinámica con contraste intravenoso y otra con contraste tardío. Resultados. De 73 casos incluidos, la RM posquirúrgica inmediata se interpretó como resección total en 38 casos y resto tumoral en 28 casos, habiendo dudas en 7 casos. En los controles evolutivos se determinó resección total en 41 casos y resto tumoral en 32. Se obtuvo una sensibilidad para detección de restos tumorales de 0,71, una especificidad de 0,82, un valor predictivo positivo de 0,89 y un valor predictivo negativo de 0,85 en la RM posquirúrgica inmediata respecto a los controles evolutivos. Conclusión. La RM posquirúrgica inmediata de macroadenomas hipofisarios es útil para valorar el grado de resección tumoral y es un buen predictor del grado de resección real definitivo al comparar con las RM posteriores, permitiendo plantear el tratamiento adecuado de forma precoz (AU)

Objective. To evaluate if it is possible to determine the extent of pituitary macroadenomas resection in the immediate postoperative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and methods. MRI of patient with pituitary macroadenomas from January 2010 until October 2014 were reviewed. Those patients who had diagnostic MRI, immediate post-surgical MRI and at least one MRI control were included. We evaluate if the findings between the immediate postsurgical MRI and the subsequent MRI were concordant. Cases which didn’t have evolutionary controls and those who were reoperation for recurrence were excluded. The degree of tumor resection was divided into groups: total resection, partial resection and doubtful. All MRI studies were performed on a1.5T machine following the same protocol sequences for all cases. One morphological part, a dynamic contrast iv and late contrast part. Results. Of the 73 cases included, immediate postoperative pituitary MRI was interpreted as total resection in 38 cases and tumoral rest in 28 cases, uncertainty among rest or inflammatory changes in 7 cases. Follow- up MRI identified 41 cases total resection and tumoral rest in 32. Sensitivity and specificity of 0.78 and 0.82 and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) 0.89 and 0.89 respectively were calculated. Conclusion. Immediate post-surgery pituitary MRI is useful for assessing the degree of tumor resection and is a good predictor of the final degree of real resection compared with the following MRI studies. It allows us to decide the most appropriate treatment at an early stage (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if it is possible to determine the extent of pituitary macroadenomas resection in the immediate postoperative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI of patient with pituitary macroadenomas from January 2010 until October 2014 were reviewed. Those patients who had diagnostic MRI, immediate post-surgical MRI and at least one MRI control were included. We evaluate if the findings between the immediate postsurgical MRI and the subsequent MRI were concordant. Cases which didn't have evolutionary controls and those who were reoperation for recurrence were excluded. The degree of tumor resection was divided into groups: total resection, partial resection and doubtful. All MRI studies were performed on a1.5T machine following the same protocol sequences for all cases. One morphological part, a dynamic contrast iv and late contrast part. RESULTS: Of the 73 cases included, immediate postoperative pituitary MRI was interpreted as total resection in 38 cases and tumoral rest in 28 cases, uncertainty among rest or inflammatory changes in 7 cases. Follow- up MRI identified 41 cases total resection and tumoral rest in 32. Sensitivity and specificity of 0.78 and 0.82 and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) 0.89 and 0.89 respectively were calculated. CONCLUSION: Immediate post-surgery pituitary MRI is useful for assessing the degree of tumor resection and is a good predictor of the final degree of real resection compared with the following MRI studies. It allows us to decide the most appropriate treatment at an early stage.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report on the survival of a series of patients with primary and metastatic lung tumours treated with radiofrequency (RF). Four years ago we published our preliminary experience with the use of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a period of 8 years we have treated 59 patients (by means of a total of 70 procedures) with primary or metastatic pulmonary neoplastic lesions, which fulfilled inclusion criteria to perform the technique. They were in all cases non-surgical lesions that had been either previously treated or not. The technique was performed in the radiology suite, under conscious analgo-sedation. We treated primary pulmonary lesions, neoplastic recurrences, or metastases with curative or palliative intention (pain management). RESULTS: Current global survival rate is 19 patients (32 %) with a mean of 26.61 ± 3.17 months (range: 20.38 ± 32.83) and a median of 16.00 ± 3.57 (range: 8.99-23.00). If we establish the difference between primary and metastatic tumours, mean survival is 27.62 ± 4.12 months in primary tumours (median: 16.00) vs. 24.65 ± 4.47 months in metastatic tumours (median: 16.00). When we studied the survival in those cases with a curative intent, mean survival in primary tumours was 30.97 ± 4.57 months (median: 21.00) vs. 25.14 ± 4.68 (median: 16.00) months in metastatic tumours. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation of lung lesions is a minimally invasive procedure that is useful in primary tumours (especially in stage I) and metastatic ones. RF has proven its usefulness in the multidisciplinary treatment of this pathology due to the low incidence of serious complications and survival obtained, considering that patients are elderly with significant comorbidity (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report on the survival of a series of patients with primary and metastatic lung tumours treated with radiofrequency (RF). Four years ago we published our preliminary experience with the use of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a period of 8 years we have treated 59 patients (by means of a total of 70 procedures) with primary or metastatic pulmonary neoplastic lesions, which fulfilled inclusion criteria to perform the technique. They were in all cases non-surgical lesions that had been either previously treated or not. The technique was performed in the radiology suite, under conscious analgo-sedation. We treated primary pulmonary lesions, neoplastic recurrences, or metastases with curative or palliative intention (pain management). RESULTS: Current global survival rate is 19 patients (32 %) with a mean of 26.61 ± 3.17 months (range: 20.38 ± 32.83) and a median of 16.00 ± 3.57 (range: 8.99-23.00). If we establish the difference between primary and metastatic tumours, mean survival is 27.62 ± 4.12 months in primary tumours (median: 16.00) vs. 24.65 ± 4.47 months in metastatic tumours (median: 16.00). When we studied the survival in those cases with a curative intent, mean survival in primary tumours was 30.97 ± 4.57 months (median: 21.00) vs. 25.14 ± 4.68 (median: 16.00) months in metastatic tumours. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation of lung lesions is a minimally invasive procedure that is useful in primary tumours (especially in stage I) and metastatic ones. RF has proven its usefulness in the multidisciplinary treatment of this pathology due to the low incidence of serious complications and survival obtained, considering that patients are elderly with significant comorbidity.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo: La anestesia del plexo periprostático (APP) no es práctica habitual durante la biopsia prostática (BP).Muchos pacientes deben someterse a una segunda, o más, BP por sospecha de carcinoma. El dolor influye en la repetición de la misma pues determina que muchos pacientes rechacen el procedimiento o que éste deba realizarse en quirófano bajo anestesia. Nuestro objetivo fue valorar la utilidad de la APP en la supresión del dolor producido durante la realización de la BP así como la aceptación del procedimiento realizado en estas condiciones. Material y métodos: De octubre del 2002 a junio del 2003 planteamos un trabajo prospectivo con casos y controles en el que incluimos aleatoriamente 275 pacientes de dos centros para BP. En el primer centro se incluyeron 101 varones a los que no se les realizó APP, mientras que en el segundo fueron 174 los pacientes sometidos a BP tras APP. Usamos hasta 10 ml de lidocaína al 2% diluida al 50% administrada mediante una aguja fina del calibre 22. Al final del procedimiento se invitó al paciente a rellenar un cuestionario de satisfacción y evaluación del dolor. Resultados: En el grupo de pacientes del segundo centro se obtuvieron valores medios significativamente inferiores (p<0,005, IC 95%) en la valoración cuantitativa del dolor, que en el grupo del primer centro (1,24±0,4 vs. 2,5±1,1).Respecto a la posibilidad, si fuese necesario, de repetir la BP, a ninguno de los pacientes del segundo centro le importaría, mientras que el 10% del primer centro no la repetirían o la aceptarían sólo bajo anestesia. No se produjeron complicaciones atribuibles a la APP. Conclusión: La APP es una técnica segura que reduce significativamente el dolor durante la BP, mejorando la aceptación de la misma (AU)

Objetive: Periprostatic plexus anesthesia (PPA) is not current practice during prostate ultrasound-guided biopsy (PB). Many patients must undergo a second or more PB if a prostate carcinoma is suspected. Due to pain, many patients reject the procedure, or it has to be performed with general anesthesia. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of PPA to eliminate the pain caused by PB, as well as the acceptance of the procedure under these conditions. Patients and Methods: Between october 2002 and june 2003 we designed a randomized prospective study with 275 patients that were seen in 2 different hospitals and required PB. In the 1st group we included 101 males who underwent PB without PA. In the other group, 174 male patients submitted PB after PPA were included. 10 cc lidocaine, 2% diluted 50% was injected with a 22g needle. At the end of the procedure, patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire about their satisfaction and degree of pain felt. Results: In the second group of patients we obtained significantly inferior values (p<0.005, IC 95%) in the quantitative evaluation of pain compared with the first group (1.24±0.4 vs. 2.5 ±1.1). Ask per the possibility of repeating PB if it were necessary, none of the patients in the 2nd group would object, whereas 10% in the 1st group would not have the biopsy repeated or would only accept it if it was done with general anesthesia. No complications due to PPA were found. Conclusion: PPA is a safe procedure that significantly reduces pain during PB, improving its acquiescence among patients (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Periprostatic plexus anesthesia (PPA) is not current practice during prostate ultrasound-guided biopsy (PB). Many patients must undergo a second or more PB if a prostate carcinoma is suspected. Due to pain, many patients reject the procedure, or it has to be performed with general anesthesia. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of PPA to eliminate the pain caused by PB, as well as the acceptance of the procedure under these conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between october 2002 and june 2003 we designed a randomized prospective study with 275 patients that were seen in 2 different hospitals and required PB. In the 1st group we included 101 males who underwent PB without PA. In the other group, 174 male patients submitted PB after PPA were included. 10 cc lidocaine, 2% diluted 50% was injected with a 22g needle. At the end of the procedure, patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire about their satisfaction and degree of pain felt. RESULTS: In the second group of patients we obtained significantly inferior values (p < 0.005, IC 95%) in the quantitative evaluation of pain compared with the first group (1.24 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.5 +/- 1.1). Ask per the possibility of repeating PB if it were necessary, none of the patients in the 2nd group would object, whereas 10% in the 1st group would not have the biopsy repeated or would only accept it if it was done with general anesthesia. No complications due to PPA were found. CONCLUSION: PPA is a safe procedure that significantly reduces pain during PB, improving its acquiescence among patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Valorar el rendimiento diagnóstico de la segunda biopsia prostática (BP). PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Un total de 116 varones con BP previa de benignidad fueron sometidos a 2 o más BP por sextantes guiadas con ultrasonidos (US). Los criterios de inclusión fueron: BP previa sospechosa (PIN), PSA elevado, TR o US sospechoso.RESULTADOS: El tiempo medio transcurrido entre la primera y siguiente biopsia fue de 13 ± 11 meses. Se obtuvieron 35 malignas y 4 premalignas en las segundas biopsias realizadas, lo que da un rendimiento diagnóstico global del 33,6%. Cuando estratificamos por valor de PSA, obtenemos que con PSA 10 ng/ml, de 34,6%. CONCLUSIÓN: La repetición de la biopsia seriada de próstata en pacientes de riesgo, mejora el rendimiento diagnóstico y elimina los falsos negativos de carcinoma. prostático

OBJETIVE: To value the diagnostic yield of the second prostate biopsy (BP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To 116 males with BP previous to kindliness surrendered to 2 or more BP for sextants guided with ultrasounds (US). The criteria of inclusion were: BP previous suspicious (PIN), high PSA, TR or suspicious US. RESULTS: The average time passed between the first and following biopsy was 13 ± 11 months. 35 malignant and 4 premalignant ones were obtained in the second realized biopsies, which gives a diagnostic global yield of 33.6%. When we stratify for value of PSA, we obtain that with PSA 10 ng/ml of 34,6%. CONCLUSION: The repetition of the serial biopsy of prostate in patients of risk, improves the diagnostic yield and eliminates the false negatives of prostate carcinoma

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: [corrected] To value the diagnostic yield of the second prostate biopsy (BP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To 116 males with BP previous to kindliness surrendered to 2 or more BP for sextants guided with ultrasounds (US). The criteria of inclusion were: BP previous suspicious (PIN), high PSA, TR or suspicious US. RESULTS: The average time passed between the first and following biopsy was 13 +/- 11 months. 35 malignant and 4 premalignant ones were obtained in the second realized biopsies, which gives a diagnostic global yield of 33.6%. When we stratify for value of PSA, we obtain that with PSA <4 ng/ml the yield was 23%, for PSA 4-10 ng/ml the yield was 32% and for PSA >10 ng/ml of 34.6%. CONCLUSION: The repetition of the serial biopsy of prostate in patients of risk, improves the diagnostic yield and eliminates the false negatives of prostate carcinoma.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Our experience in the use of ultrasonic echography (UE) is exposed as a guide for directing small lesions and pleural effusions percutaneous lesions with an unknown grounds. We have done pleural percutaneous biopsy using UE as guide in 45 patients. The needle diameter ranges between 17 and 19.5 G. Lesions were benign for 16 patients and malignant for 29. The right result was obtained in 93% of the cases. There were not complications. We conclude that echography-directed pleural biopsy presents an excellent diagnostic profitability, it improves the results obtained with blind biopsy with Cope's needle and it must precede thoracoscopy by means of its less aggressiveness.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Bouveret's syndrome is an unusual presentation of gallstone ileus, due to duodenal obstruction. It is produced by the migration of biliary calculus through a cholecystogastric or cholecystoduodenal fistula. We present 3 new cases of Bouveret's syndrome, and the clinical and radiological findings on different imaging procedures (plain abdominal radiography, barium studies, ultrasonography and computed tomography). On the basis of these cases, we discuss the diagnostic and possibly therapeutic merits of digestive endoscopy and about the different surgical procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess the usefulness of color Doppler and duplex sonography in the characterization of solid liver lesions. METHODS: We performed color Doppler and duplex sonography on 106 solid hepatic lesions. With color Doppler, we evaluated the aspect and distribution of tumoral vessels. The pulsed Doppler parameters considered were only those showing the highest systolic peak velocity values. RESULTS: Intratumoral color and pulsed Doppler signals were obtained in 81% (59/73) of malignant tumors (p < 0. 0001) but only in 18% (6/33) of benign tumors. Ninety-six percent (45/47) of the lesions with arterial intratumoral and peritumoral signals were malignant, whereas 4% were benign (p < 0.0001). Only eight (11%) malignant lesions had intratumoral venous signal vis-a-vis 23 (70%) benign. Twelve cases showing intratumoral venous Doppler signal as a single finding were benign. No statistically significant differences were observed in the quantitative parameters recorded by pulsed Doppler (Student t test, p < 0.05), there having been a clear overlapping in the values obtained in benign and malignant lesions. CONCLUSIONS: (a) The type of signal (arterial or venous) and its distribution detected by color and pulsed Doppler is more helpful than the assessment of the spectral quantitative parameters obtained by pulsed Doppler. (b) The presence of intratumoral venous flow remarkably suggests benignancy. (c) The presence of both intra- and peritumoral arterial flow in the same lesion strongly suggests malignancy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG) is an unusual disorder that is characterized by diffuse or scattered eosinophilic infiltration of the digestive tract. The diagnosis is based on histology obtained by capsule, endoscopic, laparoscopic, or laparotomy biopsy. The eosinophilic infiltration produces thickening of the small bowel wall that can be observed by using sonography. The appearance produces the pseudokidney sign that can be used to guide biopsy. We report the first case of EG diagnosed by percutaneous biopsy under ultrasound guidance.

Asunto(s)