RESUMEN
Neurologic complications during on-pump cardiovascular surgery are often induced by mobilization of atherosclerotic plaques, which is directly related to enhanced wall shear stress. In the present study, we numerically evaluated the impact of dispersive aortic cannulas on aortic blood flow characteristics, with special regard to the resulting wall shear stress profiles. An idealized numerical model of the human aorta and its branches was created and used to model straight as well as bent dispersive aortic cannulas with meshlike tips inserted in the distal ascending aorta. Standard cannulas with straight beveled or bent tips served as controls. Using a recently optimized computing method, simulations of pulsatile and nonpulsatile extracorporeal circulation were performed. Dispersive aortic cannulas reduced the maximum and average aortic wall shear stress values to approximately 50% of those with control cannulas, while the difference in local values was even larger. Moreover, under pulsatile circulation, dispersive cannulas shortened the time period during which wall shear stress values were increased. The turbulent kinetic energy was also diminished by utilizing dispersive cannulas, reducing the risk of hemolysis. In summary, dispersive aortic cannulas decrease aortic wall shear stress and turbulence during extracorporeal circulation and may therefore reduce the risk of endothelial and blood cell damage as well as that of neurologic complications caused by atherosclerotic plaque mobilization.
Asunto(s)
Aorta/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Circulación Extracorporea/efectos adversos , Placa Aterosclerótica/cirugía , Resistencia al Corte/fisiología , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Circulación Extracorporea/métodos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Placa Aterosclerótica/fisiopatología , Flujo Pulsátil , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estrés MecánicoRESUMEN
Controversy on superiority of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery still continues. Stroke as one of the major adverse events during cardiopulmonary bypass is, in the majority of cases, caused by mobilization of aortic arteriosclerotic plaques that is inducible by pathologically elevated wall shear stress values. The present study employs computational fluid dynamics to evaluate the aortic blood flow and wall shear stress profiles under the influence of antegrade or retrograde perfusion with pulsatile versus non-pulsatile extracorporeal circulation. While, compared to physiological flow, a non-pulsatile perfusion resulted in generally decreased blood velocities and only moderately increased shear forces (48 Pa versus 20 Pa antegradely and 127 Pa versus 30 Pa retrogradely), a pulsatile perfusion extensively enhanced the occurrence of turbulences, maximum blood flow speed and maximum wall shear stress (1020 Pa versus 20 Pa antegradely and 1178 Pa versus 30 Pa retrogradely). Under these circumstances arteriosclerotic embolism has to be considered. Further simulations and experimental work are necessary to elucidate the impact of our findings on the scientific discourse of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile extracorporeal circulation.