RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have described retrograde nailing as a treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures (OTA/AO type 33A-C) above total knee replacements (TKRs). It is often difficult to discern which TKRs will be compatible with intramedullary nailing because the femoral component design and intercondylar distance is highly variable among total knee designs. The goal of our study is 3-fold: (1) Review and update previous work of intercondylar distances of all currently available prostheses in the United States. (2) Review retrograde nails currently on the market and associated driving end to nail shaft diameter mismatch and opening reamer sizing. (3) Review technical tricks for executing a retrograde femoral nail for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures. METHODS: Data for the intercondylar distance of the femoral components, diameter of retrograde nails and reamers, and notch compatibility were gathered. RESULTS: The results were compiled and recorded. A "technical tricks" section was included that highlights reduction and fixation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: This update further empowers surgeons to use all the tools available when treating periprosthetic femur fractures and allows efficient identification of the compatibility of different TKR designs with various intramedullary nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Clavos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate 1-year mortality rates in elderly patients who undergo operative treatment for distal femur fractures and identify potential risk factors for mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Level 1 and Level 2 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-three elderly patients (average age 76.0 years ± 9.8) who sustained distal femur fractures between 2002 and 2012. INTERVENTION: Fracture fixation of the distal femur. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survival up to 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The 1-year mortality rate for distal femur fractures in elderly patients was 13.4%. There were no statistically significant differences in overall mortality between native bone and periprosthetic fractures, intramedullary nail or open reduction internal fixation, or across Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classifications. Overall patient mortality was significantly higher at 30 days (P = 0.036), 6 months (P = 0.019), and 1 year (P = 0.018), when surgery occurred more than 2 days from the injury. Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were significantly lower in survivors versus nonsurvivors at all time intervals (30 days, P = 0.023; 6 months, P = 0.001 and 1 year P ≤ 0.001). A time to surgery of more than 2 days, regardless of baseline illness, did not result in improved survivability at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Overall mortality for distal femur fractures was 13.4% in the elderly population. A surgical treatment more than 2 days after injury was associated with increased patient mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.