Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Prev Med ; 20(4 Suppl): 75-83, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11331136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An estimated 1 million to 1.25 million people in the United States are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and are at substantially increased risk of developing chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis and primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Immunization with hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) is the most effective means of preventing HBV infection and its consequences. METHODS: To identify and describe children who had not completed the three-dose HepB series, we analyzed data from the 1999 National Immunization Survey (NIS). Among the 2648 children aged 19 to 35 months who did not complete the HepB series, we examined the relationship between the number of doses of HepB received and the number of vaccination visits made, receipt of the birth dose of HepB, age at the time of first vaccination visit (excluding that for the birth dose of HepB), and completion of the 4:3:1:3 series (four doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, three doses of poliovirus vaccine, one dose of measles-containing vaccine, and three doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine [Hib]). RESULTS: Overall, 11.8% of the children who were included in the 1999 NIS did not complete the HepB series. Among these series-incomplete children, most (79.8%; 95% CI, 77.4%-82.2%) did not receive the birth dose of HepB, and most (80.2%; 95% CI, 77.6%-82.8%) had three or more vaccination visits. Most of the series-incomplete children (87.3%; 95% CI, 85.1%-89.5%) who had three or more vaccination visits received one or two doses of HepB. Among series-incomplete children with at least three vaccination visits, those who did not receive any HepB were more likely to have completed the 4:3:1:3 series (67.1%; 95% CI, 58.8%-75.4%) than those who received at least one dose of HepB (52.7%; 95% CI, 49.0%-56.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Children who did not complete the HepB series fell into three distinct groups: children who made at least three vaccination visits but did not begin the HepB series (n=326); children who made three or more vaccination visits and received one or two doses of HepB (n=1835); and children who made fewer than three vaccination visits (n=487). Different intervention strategies are needed to have an impact on each of these groups, including understanding why parents and providers may not be receptive to HepB, decreasing missed opportunities to administer HepB, and implementing tracking systems such as registries to identify and contact children who are due or overdue for vaccinations.


Asunto(s)
Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Lactante , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 20(4 Suppl): 61-8, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11331134

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with undervaccination of African-American preschoolers, to describe the number of vaccination visits made by undervaccinated children and the number of visits needed to be series complete, and to describe the children who did not receive the single dose of measles-containing vaccine recommended for preschoolers. METHODS: We used the 1999 National Immunization Survey (NIS) to describe vaccination coverage for the 4:3:1:3 vaccine series (four doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, three doses of poliovirus vaccine, one dose of any measles-containing vaccine, and three doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine) among non-Hispanic, African-American preschoolers due to concerns that they may be at risk of undervaccination. Children who did not complete this basic vaccine series were classified for further analysis according to the number of doses they lacked (i.e., one dose missed, two or three doses missed, or four or more doses missed). Significant associations between demographic characteristics and vaccination status or degree of undervaccination were determined. RESULTS: Of the 26.2% of African-American preschoolers who did not complete the 4:3:1:3 vaccine series, 40.3% lacked one, 35.3% lacked two or three, and 25.0% lacked four or more doses of vaccine. Children who did not complete the 4:3:1:3 vaccine series were less likely to have married mothers, were less likely to have mothers aged > or = 35 years, or were less likely to be up to date at age 3 months than the children who completed the 4:3:1:3 vaccine series. Among the undervaccinated, 63.7% had a sufficient number of vaccination visits to have completed the basic series. However, most (78.7%) of the severely undervaccinated (children who lacked more than three doses of vaccine) had three or fewer vaccination visits. For 72.6% of the undervaccinated preschoolers, only one additional vaccination visit was needed to complete the 4:3:1:3 vaccine series; among these, 78.3% had an adequate number of vaccination visits to have completed the series. Overall, 9.9% of the African-American children aged 19 to 35 months (i.e., approximately 85,000 African-American children aged 19 to 35 months) were at risk for measles. Among the children who lacked more than three doses of vaccine, 68.1% were at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the estimated coverage of 73.8% for the 4:3:1:3 vaccine series among African-American children aged 19 to 35 months was not a result of limited access to care. On the contrary, 90.5% of African-American children had enough vaccination visits to complete the series. To raise coverage and prevent potential outbreaks, providers should assess each child's vaccination status at every visit, and administer all needed vaccinations at that time. For the most severely undervaccinated children, this strategy may not be adequate, because they did not have the minimum number of vaccination visits required for series completion. For these children, other strategies are needed for increasing vaccination coverage.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Preescolar , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Lactante , Edad Materna , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ ; 49(9): 27-38, 2000 Sep 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11016876

RESUMEN

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Undervaccinated children enrolled in day care centers and schools are vulnerable to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. A Healthy People 2000 objective is to increase to > or = 95% vaccination coverage among children attending licensed day care facilities and kindergarten through postsecondary school (objective 20.11). REPORTING PERIOD COVERED: September 1997-June 1998. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: CDC's National Immunization Program administers grants to support 64 vaccination programs. These programs are in all 50 states, eight territories or jurisdictions (American Samoa, Republic of Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, Republic of Palau, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), five cities (Chicago, Houston, San Antonio, New York City, and Philadelphia), and the District of Columbia. Grant guidelines require annual school vaccination surveys and biennial surveys of Head Start programs and licensed day care facilities. This system constitutes the only source of nationally representative vaccination coverage estimates for these populations. RESULTS: Head Start Programs: Of the 64 reporting areas, 33 (51.6%) submitted coverage levels for children enrolled in Head Start programs. Of these, all 33 programs reported coverage levels for diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTP), diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DT), or tetanus toxoids (Td), poliovirus vaccine, and measles vaccine; and 32 reported coverage levels for mumps and rubella vaccines. Four programs reported coverage levels for the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR). The mean vaccination coverage levels for the 1997-98 school year among the reporting vaccination programs were 97.8% for poliovirus vaccine (range: 80.0%-100.0%), 97.0% for DTP/DT/Td (range: 87.7%-100.0%), 93.3% for measles vaccine (range: 91.4%-100.0%), and 93.2% for mumps and rubella vaccines (range: 91.4%-100.0%). Licensed Day Care Facilities: Of the 63 reporting areas with licensed day care facilities, 38 (60.3%) submitted coverage levels for enrolled children. Of these, all 38 programs reported coverage levels for poliovirus vaccine and DTP/DT/Td, 37 reported coverage levels for measles vaccine, and 36 reported coverage levels for mumps and rubella vaccines. Four programs reported coverage levels for the combined MMR. The mean vaccination coverage levels among the reporting areas were 95.8% for poliovirus vaccine (range: 85.1%-99.8%), 95.7% for DTP/DT/Td (range: 77.6%-99.9%), 89.1% for measles vaccine (range: 78.0%-99.9%), and 89.1% for mumps and rubella vaccines (range: 78.0%-99.9%). Kindergarten/First Grade: Of the 64 reporting areas, 43 (67.2%) submitted coverage levels for children enrolled in kindergarten and first grade. Of these 43 programs, 42 reported coverage levels for poliovirus vaccine and DTP/DT/Td, and 43 reported coverage levels for measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. Four of the 43 programs reported coverage levels for the combined MMR. The mean vaccination coverage levels among the reporting areas were 96.7% for poliovirus vaccine (range: 82.8%-99.9%), 96.7% for DTP/DT/Td (range: 82.8%-99.8%), 96.0% for measles vaccine (range: 82.8%-99.9%), and 96.5% for mumps and rubella vaccines (range: 82.8%-99.9%). INTERPRETATION: High levels of vaccination coverage among children entering school most likely result from the successful implementation of state-specific school vaccination laws, which have applied to children entering school in all states and the District of Columbia since at least 1990. All states, territories, and the District of Columbia have additional laws that require vaccination of children in licensed day care facilities. However, because a high proportion of states and territories did not submit vaccination coverage reports to CDC, these estimated means may not reflect levels for all children in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Vigilancia de la Población , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Guarderías Infantiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Intervención Educativa Precoz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Prev Med ; 25(2): 118-25, 1996.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8860276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer screening can be an effective tool in the early detection of breast cancer but remains underused by women in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed data from 22,657 women (2,068 black women, 707 Hispanic women, and 19,882 white women) who participated in the 1990 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance state-based telephone survey. Using the recommended guidelines of the American Cancer Society for breast cancer screening, we examined utilization rates by demographic and selected variables, stratified by ethnic groups. RESULTS: Of the women included in the analysis, 47% of both black and Hispanic women and 50% of white women reported having had a recent mammogram, and 68% of black women, 59% of Hispanic women, and 66% of white women reported having had a recent clinical breast examination (CBE). Important predictors of the use of breast cancer screening procedures for each group were having had a routine examination in the past year, having seen an obstetrician or gynecologist or specialist during the last routine examination, and more than a high school education. CONCLUSIONS: Many women are not having mammography and CBEs. Efforts to increase screening must focus on encouraging providers to use CBEs as a screening tool and to recommend mammography. Strategies should be developed to increase the use of these procedures among women, particularly those of low income and low education levels.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Hispánicos o Latinos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Palpación/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud/etnología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA