RESUMEN

ObjectivesWe explored whether adapting traditional neuropsychological tests for online administration against the backdrop of COVID-19 was feasible for people with diverse forms of dementia and healthy older controls. We compared face-to-face and remote settings to ascertain whether remote administration affected performance. DesignWe used a longitudinal design for healthy older controls who completed face-to-face neuropsychological assessments between three and four years before taking part remotely. For patients, we used a cross-sectional design, contrasting a prospective remote cohort with a retrospective face-to-face cohort matched in age, education, and disease duration. SettingRemote assessments were performed using video-conferencing and online testing platforms, with participants using a personal computer or tablet and situated in a quiet room in their own home. Face-to-face assessments were carried out in dedicated testing rooms in our research centre. ParticipantsThe remote cohort comprised ten healthy older controls (also seen face-to-face 3-4 years previously) and 25 patients (n=8 Alzheimers disease (AD); n=3 behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD); n=4 semantic dementia (SD); n=5 progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA); n=5 logopenic aphasia (LPA)). The face-to-face patient cohort comprised 64 patients (n=25 AD; n=12 bvFTD; n=9 SD; n=12 PNFA; n=6 LPA). Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe outcome measures comprised the strength of evidence under a Bayesian analytic framework for differences in performances between face-to-face and remote testing environments on a general neuropsychological (primary outcomes) and neurolingustic battery (secondary outcomes). ResultsThere was evidence to suggest comparable performance across testing environments for all participant groups, for a range of neuropsychological tasks across both batteries. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that remote delivery of neuropsychological tests for dementia research is feasible. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_ST_ABSMethodological strengths of this study includeC_ST_ABSO_LIDiverse patient cohorts representing rare dementias with specific communication difficulties C_LIO_LISampling of diverse and relevant neuropsychological domains C_LIO_LIUse of Bayesian statistics to quantify the strength of evidence for the putative null hypothesis (no effect between remote and face-to-face testing) C_LI Limitations includeO_LIRelatively small cohort sizes C_LIO_LILack of direct head-to-head comparisons of test environment in the same patients C_LI