RESUMEN
Background/Objectives: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) resulting from histocompatibility differences between donor and host cells leading to inflammation, tissue damage, and compromised patient outcome. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered as a second-line treatment administered to patients with GVHD who do not respond to corticosteroid treatment or who experience a relapse after an initial response and are therefore classified as steroid refractory (SR). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical response rates in both pediatric and adult patients with acute (a) or chronic (c) GVHD and to assess the effectiveness of ECP using the real-world data from a single center. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 30 patients, including 11 pediatric and 19 adult patients who were treated with ECP as a second-, third-, or fourth-line therapy for (a) and (c) GVHD, alongside corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory medications. The median time from aGVHD onset to ECP was 11.5 days (range: 3 days-9 months), while for cGVHD, the median time was 90 days (range: 2 days-9 months). Results: The overall response rate (ORR) in the aGVHD patient population was 60% with a median of 9 procedures (range: 2-20). For cGVHD patients, the ORR was 70% after a median of 23.5 ECP procedures (range: 8-43). Most patients had skin involvement, with ECP achieving an ORR of 81.8% in aGVHD and 77.7% in cGVHD cases. Conclusions: ECP is a beneficial therapy for patients with (a) and (c) GVHD who have not responded to corticosteroids and other forms of immunosuppressive therapy. Specifically, ECP demonstrated efficacy in improving skin and oral symptoms and permitted reductions in or the elimination of their corticosteroid usage. The study found that extending the duration of ECP treatment was associated with better outcomes, and no detectable complications were observed over a 38-week period.
RESUMEN
Background: Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm diagnosed in young children, characterized by somatic or germline mutations that lead to hyperactive RAS signaling. The only curative option is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Recent data showing that aberrant DNA methylation plays a significant role in pathogenesis and correlates with clinical risk suggest a possible benefit of hypomethylating agents (HMA) in JMML treatment. Aim: The aim is to report the results of HMA-based therapy with 5-azacytidine (AZA) in three JMML patients treated in a single center, non-participating in EWOG-MDS study. Methods: The diagnosis and treatment response were evaluated according to international consensus criteria. AZA 75 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) was administered once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. All patients were monitored for hematologic response, spleen size, and evolution of extramedullary disease. Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) were performed after the 3rd AZA cycle and before SCT to evaluate the molecular alterations and genetic response. Results: Three patients diagnosed with JMML were treated with AZA (off-label indication) in Pediatric Department of Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania between 2017 and 2019. There were two females and one male with median age 11 months, range 2-16 months. The cytogenetic analysis showed normal karyotype in all patients. Molecular analysis confirmed KRAS G13D mutation in two patients and NRAS G12D mutation in one patient. The clinical evaluation showed important splenomegaly and hepatomegaly in all 3 pts. One patient received AZA for early relapse after haploidentical HSCT and the other two patients received upfront AZA, as bridging therapy before HSCT. After HMA therapy, 2/3 patients achieved clinical partial response (cPR), 1/3 had clinical stable disease (cSD) and all had genetic stable disease (gSD) after 3 cycles and were able to receive the planned HSTC. One patient achieved clinical and genetic complete response before HSCT. During 22 cycles of AZA there were only four adverse events but only one determined dose reduction and treatment delay. Conclusion: Our data show that AZA monotherapy is safe and effective in controlling disease both in upfront and relapsed patients in order to proceed to HSCT.