Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 3(5): 498-506, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20488406

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine which drug-eluting stent (DES) is preferable for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to elucidate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcome of each DES. BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown the benefit of DES in patients with STEMI. Diabetes mellitus might differentially affect outcomes of each DES. METHODS: We analyzed the large-scale, prospective, observational KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry) study, which enrolled 4,416 STEMI patients (26% with diabetes) treated with paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: In the overall population, the MACE rate at 1 year was significantly higher in the PES than the SES group (11.6% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.014), which was mainly due to increased TLR (3.7% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001). In the diabetic subgroup, however, the MACE rate was not significantly different between PES and SES (14.5% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.217), in contrast to the nondiabetic subgroup, where PES was inferior to SES as in the overall population. Matching by propensity-score did not significantly alter these results. For TLR, there was interaction between the type of stents and diabetes mellitus (unadjusted: p = 0.052; after propensity-score matching: p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The PES was inferior to the SES in the overall population, with regard to the occurrence of MACE and TLR. However, subgroup analysis for diabetic subjects showed no differences in clinical outcomes between PES and SES. These results suggest that diabetes differentially affects the outcome of first-generation DES.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Cardiopatías/etiología , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Humanos , Corea (Geográfico) , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Circ J ; 72(9): 1403-9, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18724013

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of more aggressive pharmacological treatment on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who do not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The 924 NSTEMI patients treated with early conservative strategy (69.2+/-12.5 years, 637 males) in 50 hospitals that were high-volume centers with facilities for primary PCI were recruited to the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) from November 2005 to August 2007. For all patients, the pharmacotherapy index based on the use of drugs during hospital stay was assessed (range of points 0-10). Primary endpoint was the combined in-hospital mortality and morbidity and major adverse cardiac events during 1 month of clinical follow-up. Of the patients, data from 847 who were followed-up for 1 month after discharge were analyzed. The rate of the primary endpoint decreased with an increase of the pharmacotherapy index and this result was similar in the low- and high-risk groups. In the multivariate analysis, low pharmacotherapy index (

Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Corea (Geográfico)/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA