RESUMEN
Obesity is an increasingly prevalent comorbidity within the UK population. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of obese patients in an elective surgical population. The second aim was to determine the choice of airway equipment and incidence of airway events in obese vs. non-obese patients. We conducted a cross-sectional observational study over two 24-h periods in March 2018 across 39 hospitals in the greater London area. Data were collected regarding 1874 patients. The incidence of obesity was 32% in the study population compared with 26% in the general UK population (p < 0.0001). Minor airway events were defined as: desaturation to Sp O2 < 90%; failed mask ventilation; supraglottic airway device problem; aspiration; airway trauma and difficult intubation; or recognised oesophageal intubation. Major airway events were defined as: unrecognised oesophageal intubation; a 'cannot intubate cannot oxygenate' emergency; the need for unplanned front-of-neck airway; cardiac arrest; or unplanned intensive care unit admission due to an airway event. In total, 89 minor and two major airway events were recorded. Obese patients were more likely to experience a minor airway event (RR 2.39, 95%CI 1.60-3.57), the most common being desaturation (Sp O2 < 90%). The use of a supraglottic airway device in obese vs. non-obese patients was associated with increased airway events (RR 3.46 [1.88-6.40]). Tracheal intubation vs. supraglottic airway device use increased with obesity class but was not associated with a decrease in airway events (RR 0.90 [0.53-1.55]). Our data suggest that obesity is more common in the elective surgical vs. general population and minor airway events are more common in obese vs. non-obese elective patients.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/efectos adversos , Obesidad/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Saturación de Oxígeno , Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is a genetic disorder in which patients may have life threatening attacks of neurologic dysfunction. This study examined the prognosis during the past 50 years of patients in the United States who required hospitalization for porphyric attacks. The cumulative survival was determined for 136 patients with AIP who were hospitalized for porphyric attacks between 1940 and 1988. Diagnosis was established on the basis of clinical symptoms, in combination with increased urinary excretion of porphobilinogen. The patient group had an average age of 32 years (range 9 to 75) at diagnosis and consisted of 43 males and 93 females. At follow-up, 19 males (44%) and 31 females (33%) were decreased. The standardized mortality ratio for the 136 patients, compared to an age-matched hypothetical population experiencing USA 1970 Census Death Rates was 3.2, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.4-4.0. Most deaths occurred during the initial porphyric attack (20% of deaths) or a subsequent attack (38% of deaths). Suicide was also common (five deaths). Comparison was made between 50 patients who were diagnosed before 1971, the year in which hematin therapy became available, and 86 patients who were diagnosed afterward. There was improved survival in the latter group, particularly after 10 years from the time of diagnosis, but this did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, the proportionate increase in mortality due to symptomatic AIP was three-fold compared to the general population during the past 50 years. The major cause of the increased mortality was the porphyric attack itself.
Asunto(s)
Porfiria Intermitente Aguda/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Hemina/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Porfiria Intermitente Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
A double-blind trial failed to demonstrate any significant short-term effects of clomipramine in doses recommended for use in general practice (in addition to the usual range of psychotherapeutic help) in the treatment of children with school refusal and neurotic disorder. Patterns of improvement were also studied for the sample as a whole irrespective of treatment. Neither age nor sex were significantly related to improvement, except on one behavioural measure where girls initially did better than boys. In addition, it was found that there was a rapid relief of depression but neurotic symptomatology tended to persist.