RESUMEN
SLC6A19 inhibitors are being studied as therapeutic agents for Phenylketonuria. In this work, a potent SLC6A19 inhibitor (RA836) elevated rat kidney uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate (IDS) levels by intensity (arbitrary unit) of 13.7{plus minus}7.7 compared to vehicle 0.3{plus minus}0.1 (P=0.01) as determined by tissue mass spectrometry imaging (tMSI) analysis. We hypothesized that increased plasma and kidney levels of IDS could be caused by the simultaneous inhibition of both Slc6a19 and a kidney IDS transporter responsible for excretion of IDS into urine. To test this, we first confirmed the formation of IDS through tryptophan metabolism by feeding rats a Trp-free diet. Inhibiting Slc6a19 with RA836 led to increased IDS in these rats. Next, RA836 and its key metabolites were evaluated in vitro for inhibiting kidney transporters OAT1, OAT3 and BCRP. RA836 inhibits BCRP with an IC50 of 0.045 µM but shows no significant inhibition of OAT1 or OAT3. Finally, RA836 analogs with either potent or no inhibition of SLC6A19 and/or BCRP were synthesized and administered to rats fed a normal diet. Plasma and kidney samples were collected to quantify IDS using LC-MS. Neither a SLC6A19 inactive but potent BCRP inhibitor nor a SLC6A19 active but weak BCRP inhibitor raised IDS levels, while compounds inhibiting both transporters caused IDS accumulation in rat plasma and kidney, supporting the hypothesis that rat Bcrp contributes to the excretion of IDS. In summary, we identified that inhibiting Slc6a19 increases IDS formation, while simultaneously inhibiting Bcrp results in IDS accumulation in the kidney and plasma. Significance Statement This is the first publication to decipher the mechanism for accumulation of IDS (a uremic toxin) in rats via inhibition of both Slc6a19 and Bcrp. Specifically, inhibition of Slc6a19 in the GI track increases IDS formation and inhibition of Bcrp in the kidney blocks IDS excretion. Therefore, we should avoid inhibiting both SLC6A19 and BCRP simultaneously in humans to prevent accumulation of IDS, a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, psychic anxiety, and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients.
RESUMEN
The failure of drug candidates during clinical trials and post-marketing withdrawal due to Drug Induced Liver Injury (DILI), results in significant late-stage attrition in the pharmaceutical industry. Animal studies have proven insufficient to definitively predict DILI in the clinic, therefore a variety of in vitro models are being tested in an effort to improve prediction of human hepatotoxicity. The model system described here consists of cryopreserved primary rat, dog or human hepatocytes co-cultured together with a fibroblast cell line, which aids in the hepatocytes' maintenance of more in vivo-like characteristics compared to traditional hepatic mono-cultures, including long term viability and retention of activity of cytochrome P450 isozymes. Cell viability was assessed by measurement of ATP following treatment with 29 compounds having known hepatotoxic liabilities. Hµrelrat™, Hµreldog™, and Hµrelhuman™ hepatic co-cultures were treated for 24h, or under repeat-dosing for 7 or 13days, and compared to rat and human hepatic mono-cultures following single-dose exposure for 24h. The results allowed for a comparison of cytotoxicity, species-specific responses and the effect of repeat compound exposure on the prediction of hepatotoxic potential in each model. Results show that the co-culture model had greater sensitivity compared to that of the hepatic mono-cultures. In addition, "time-based ratios" were determined by dividing the compounds' 24-hour TC50/Cmax values by TC50/Cmax values measured after dosing for either 7 or 13days. The results suggest that this approach may serve as a useful adjunct to traditional measurements of hepatotoxicity, improving the predictive value of early screening studies.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación Celular , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Técnicas de Cocultivo , Fibroblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Hepatocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Cultivo Primario de Células , Toxicología/métodos , Animales , Diferenciación Celular , Línea Celular , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/metabolismo , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/patología , Perros , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Fibroblastos/patología , Hepatocitos/metabolismo , Hepatocitos/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Medición de Riesgo , Especificidad de la Especie , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are currently no serum biomarkers capable of distinguishing elevations in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) that portend serious liver injury potential from benign elevations such as those occurring during cholestyramine treatment. The aim of the research was to test the hypothesis that newly proposed biomarkers of hepatotoxicity would not significantly rise in serum during elevations in serum ALT associated with cholestyramine treatment, which has never been associated with clinically relevant liver injury. METHODS: In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, cholestyramine (8g) was administered for 11 days to healthy adult volunteers. Serum from subjects with elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) exceeding three-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN) were utilized for biomarker quantification. RESULTS: In 11 of 67 subjects, cholestyramine treatment resulted in ALT elevation by >3x ULN (mean 6.9 fold; range 3-28 fold). In these 11 subjects, there was a 22.4-fold mean increase in serum levels of miR-122 relative to baseline, supporting a liver origin of the serum ALT. Significant elevations were noted in mean levels of necrosis biomarkers sorbitol dehydrogenase (8.1 fold), cytokeratin 18 (2.1 fold) and HMGB1 (1.7 fold). Caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18, a biomarker of apoptosis was also significantly elevated (1.7 fold). A rise in glutamate dehydrogenase (7.3 fold) may support mitochondrial dysfunction. CONCLUSION: All toxicity biomarkers measured in this study were elevated along with ALT, confirming the liver origin and reflecting both hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis. Since cholestyramine treatment has no clinical liver safety concerns, we conclude that interpretation of the biomarkers studied may not be straightforward in the context of assessing liver safety of new drugs.
Asunto(s)
Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Resina de Colestiramina/administración & dosificación , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Método Doble Ciego , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , PlacebosRESUMEN
Transcriptomics can be a valuable aid to pathologists. The information derived from microarray studies may soon include the entire transcriptomes of most cell types, tissues and organs for the major species used for toxicology and human disease risk assessment. Gene expression changes observed in such studies relate to every aspect of normal physiology and pathophysiology. When interpreting such data, one is forced to look "far from the lamp post:' and in so doing, face one's ignorance of many areas of biology. The central role of the liver in toxicology, as well as in many aspects of whole-body physiology, makes the hepatic transcriptome an excellent place to start your studies. This article provides data that reveals the effects of fasting and circadian rhythm on the rat hepatic transcriptome, both of which need to be kept in mind when interpreting large-scale gene expression in the liver. Once you become comfortable with evaluating mRNA expression profiles and learn to correlate these data with your clinical and morphological observations, you may wonder why you did not start your studies of transcriptomics sooner. Additional study data can be viewed at the journal website at (www.toxpath.org). Two data files are provided in Excel format, which contain the control animal data from each of the studies referred to in the text,including normalized signal intensity data for each animal (n=5) in the 6-hour, 24-hour, and 5-day time points. These files are briefly described in the associated 'Readme' file, and the complete list of GenBank numbers and Affymetrix IDs are provided in a separate txt file. These files are available at http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.comlopenurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0192-6233. Click on the issue link for 33(1), then select this article. A download option appears at the bottom of this abstract. In order to access the full article online, you must either have an individual subscription or a member subscription accessed through (www.toxpath.org).
Asunto(s)
Expresión Génica , Hígado/fisiología , Hígado/fisiopatología , Transcripción Genética , Animales , Ritmo Circadiano , Ayuno , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Modelos Genéticos , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de OligonucleótidosRESUMEN
Toxicogenomics is an emerging multidisciplinary science that will profoundly impact the practice of toxicology. New generations of biologists, using evolving toxicogenomics tools, will generate massive data sets in need of interpretation. Mathematical tools are necessary to cluster and otherwise find meaningful structure in such data. The linking of this structure to gene functions and disease processes, and finally the generation of useful data interpretation remains a significant challenge. The training and background of pathologists make them ideally suited to contribute to the field of toxicogenomics, from experimental design to data interpretation. Toxicologic pathology, a discipline based on pattern recognition, requires familiarity with the dynamics of disease processes and interactions between organs, tissues, and cell populations. Optimal involvement of toxicologic pathologists in toxicogenomics requires that they communicate effectively with the many other scientists critical for the effective application of this complex discipline to societal problems. As noted by Petricoin III et al (Nature Genetics 32, 474-479, 2002), cooperation among regulators, sponsors and experts will be essential for realizing the potential of microarrays for public health. Following a brief introduction to the role of mathematics in toxicogenomics, "data interpretation" from the perspective of a pathologist is briefly discussed. Based on oscillatory behavior in the liver, the importance of an understanding of mathematics is addressed, and an approach to learning mathematics "later in life" is provided. An understanding of pathology by mathematicians involved in toxicogenomics is equally critical, as both mathematics and pathology are essential for transforming toxicogenomics data sets into useful knowledge.
Asunto(s)
Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Matemática , Patología , Farmacogenética , Toxicología , Animales , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Cooperación Internacional , Farmacogenética/métodos , Farmacogenética/tendenciasRESUMEN
Thiazolidinedione PPARgamma agonists (troglitazone and rosiglitazone) were previously shown to promote colon tumor formation in C57BL/6J-APC(min)/+ mice, a model for human familial adenomatous polyposis. This study was conducted to determine if another thiazolidinedione PPARgamma agonist, pioglitazone, and a PPARgamma agonist structurally unrelated to the thiazolidinedione family, NID525, (a tetrazole-substituted phenoxymethylquinolone), would also promote colon tumors in this mouse model. Mice were treated in-feed with the thiazolidinediones troglitazone (150 mg/kg/day), rosiglitazone (20 mg/kg/day), or pioglitazone (150 mg/kg/day), or with NID525 (150 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks. An increased incidence in colon tumors compared to controls was observed for all of the thiazolidinedione-treated groups as well as the NID525-treated group. These results indicate that the tumor-promoting effect of PPARgamma agonists in the colon of C57BL/6J-APC(min)/+ mice is likely related to the pharmacological activity of this group of drugs and not the thiazolidinedione structure.
Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Neoplasias del Colon/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/toxicidad , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares , Tiazolidinedionas/toxicidad , Factores de Transcripción , Adenocarcinoma/inducido químicamente , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenoma/inducido químicamente , Adenoma/genética , Adenoma/patología , Animales , Cromanos/química , Cromanos/toxicidad , Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Genes APC , Hipoglucemiantes/química , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Mutantes , Pioglitazona , Quinolinas/química , Quinolinas/toxicidad , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares/agonistas , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares/antagonistas & inhibidores , Rosiglitazona , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Tetrazoles/química , Tetrazoles/toxicidad , Tiazolidinedionas/química , Factores de Transcripción/agonistas , Factores de Transcripción/antagonistas & inhibidores , TroglitazonaRESUMEN
RPR127963 demonstrates an excellent pharmacokinetic profile in several species and was found to be efficacious in the prevention of restenosis in a Yucatan mini-pig model upon oral administration of 1-5 mg/kg. The in vitro selectivity profile and SAR of the highly optimized PDGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor are highlighted.