Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pancreatology ; 17(6): 974-982, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28958898

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Studies reporting on function after pancreatic surgery are frequently based on diabetes history, fasting glycemia or random glycemia. The aim of this study was to investigate prospectively the evolution of pancreatic function in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy based on proper pre- and postoperative function tests. It was hypothesised that pancreatic function deteriorates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2016, 78 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for oncologic indications had a prospective evaluation of their endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function. Endocrine function was evaluated with the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the 1 mg intravenous glucagon test. Exocrine function was evaluated with a 13C-labelled mixed-triglyceride breath test. Tests were performed pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: In 90.5% (19/21) of patients with preoperatively known diabetes, no change in endocrine function was observed. In contrast, endocrine function improved in 68.1% (15/22) of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes. 40% (14/35) of patients with a preoperative normal OGTT or prediabetes experienced deterioration in function. In multivariate analysis, improvement of newly diagnosed diabetes was correlated with preoperative bilirubin levels (p = 0.045), while progression towards diabetes was correlated with preoperative C-peptidogenic index T30 (p = 0.037). A total of 20.5% (16/78) of patients had pancreatic exocrine insufficiency preoperatively. Another 51.3% (40/78) of patients deteriorated on exocrine level. In total, 64.1% (50/78) of patients required pancreatic enzyme-replacement therapy postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although deterioration of endocrine function was expected after pancreatic resection, improvement is frequently observed in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes. Exocrine function deteriorates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/etiología , Pruebas de Función Pancreática , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Estado Prediabético/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Estudios de Cohortes , Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
HPB (Oxford) ; 18(12): 1017-1022, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27726974

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recently, pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) has attracted renewed interest as a reconstruction technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), as it may imply a lower risk of clinical pancreatic fistula than reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). We hypothesise that pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is more common during clinical follow-up after PG than it is after PJ. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study compares the prevalence of PEI in patients undergoing PD for malignancy with reconstruction by PG versus reconstruction by PJ. PEI during the first year of follow-up was defined as the intake of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) within one year postoperatively and/or an abnormal exocrine function test. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients, having undergone surgery at two university hospitals, were included in the study. PEI during the first year postoperatively was present in 75.0% of the patients with PG, compared to 45.7% with PJ (p < 0.001). Intake of PERT within one year after surgery was found to be more prevalent in the PG group, i.e. 75.8% versus 38.5% (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards more disturbed exocrine function tests after PG (p = 0.061). CONCLUSIONS: PEI is more common with PG reconstruction than with PJ reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/epidemiología , Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatoyeyunostomía/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica/epidemiología , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático , Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/enzimología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Función Pancreática , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Pancreatology ; 16(4): 671-6, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27216012

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports on the prevalence of diabetes in pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis patients are based on inconsistent and equivocal criteria. The objective of this study is to prospectively assess with conclusive methods the preoperative glycaemic status of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. We hypothesise that most of those patients are unaware of these disturbances in glycaemic status and that the prevalence is underestimated. METHODS: During the last 2 years, patients referred for pancreatic surgery and without history of diabetes underwent a prospective preoperative screening with an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and determination of the glycated haemoglobin level (HbA1c). The American Diabetes Association's criteria for diabetes and pre-diabetes were used. Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity were calculated using HOMA2 indices. Impact on surgical policy has been scored. RESULTS: 99 patients were screened, 25 had a history of diabetes. The other 74 underwent an OGTT and HbA1c determination. Only 29.7% (22/74) had a normal glucose metabolism, while 8.1% (6/74) had impaired fasting glucose, 21.6% (16/74) had impaired glucose tolerance, 6.7% (5/74) had a combination of both, and 33.8% (25/74) had undiagnosed diabetes. In 15.2% (15/99) of the patients, this preoperative assessment had an impact on surgical policy. CONCLUSIONS: 77.7% of patients referred for pancreatic surgery had some degree of (pre-)diabetes. In 70.3% of patients without a history of diabetes, these disturbances in glucose metabolism are a new finding. Physicians involved in pancreatic surgery should be aware of the frequently undiagnosed (pre-)diabetes and actively check for it. This prevalence is underestimated.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Páncreas/cirugía , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Bélgica/epidemiología , Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Intolerancia a la Glucosa/diagnóstico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Pruebas de Función Pancreática , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreatitis Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA