RESUMEN
In plant organelles, each C-to-U RNA editing site is specifically recognized by PLS class pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins with E1-E2, E1-E2-E+, or E1-E2-DYW domain extensions at the C-terminus. The distance between the PPR domain binding site and the RNA editing site is usually fixed at four bases, increasing the specificity of target site recognition in this system. We here report, in contrast to the general case, on MEF28, which edits two adjacent mitochondrial sites, nad2-89 and nad2-90. When the sDYW domain of MEF28 was replaced with one derived from MEF11 or CRR22, the ability to edit downstream sites was lost, suggesting that the DYW domain of MEF28 provides unique target flexibility for two continuous cytidines. By contrast, substitutions of the entire E1-E2-DYW domains by MEF19E1-E2, SLO2E1-E2-E+, or the CRR22E1-E2-E+ target both nad2 sites. In these cases, access to the contiguous sites in the chimeric PPR proteins is likely to be provided by the trans-associated DYW1-like proteins via the replaced E1-E2 or E1-E2-E+ domains. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the gating domain of MEF28 plays an important role in specific target site recognition of the DYW domain. This finding suggests that the DYW domain and its internal gating domain fine-tune the specificity of the target site, which is valuable information for designing specific synthetic RNA editing tools based on plant RNA editing factors.
RESUMEN
Cytidine-to-uridine RNA editing is a posttranscriptional process in plant organelles, mediated by specific pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins. In angiosperms, hundreds of sites undergo RNA editing. By contrast, only 13 sites are edited in the moss Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens Some are conserved between the two species, like the mitochondrial editing site nad5eU598RC. The PPR proteins assigned to this editing site are known in both species: the DYW-type PPR protein PPR79 in P. patens and the E+-type PPR protein CWM1 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). CWM1 also edits sites ccmCeU463RC, ccmBeU428SL, and nad5eU609VV. Here, we reciprocally expressed the P. patens and Arabidopsis editing factors in the respective other genetic environment. Surprisingly, the P. patens editing factor edited all target sites when expressed in the Arabidopsis cwm1 mutant background, even when carboxy-terminally truncated. Conversely, neither Arabidopsis CWM1 nor CWM1-PPR79 chimeras restored editing in P. patens ppr79 knockout plants. A CWM1-like PPR protein from the early diverging angiosperm macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia) features a complete DYW domain and fully rescued editing of nad5eU598RC when expressed in P. patens. We conclude that (1) the independently evolved P. patens editing factor PPR79 faithfully operates in the more complex Arabidopsis editing system, (2) truncated PPR79 recruits catalytic DYW domains in trans when expressed in Arabidopsis, and (3) the macadamia CWM1-like protein retains the capacity to work in the less complex P. patens editing environment.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Arabidopsis/genética , Bryopsida/genética , Macadamia/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Edición de ARN , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/genética , Evolución Molecular , Técnicas de Inactivación de Genes , Prueba de Complementación Genética , Mitocondrias/genética , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Filogenia , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/metabolismoRESUMEN
Terrestrial plants have C-to-U RNA editing in the transcripts of plastids and mitochondria. Target specificity for more than several hundred editing sites are governed by PLS (PPR, Long and Short) class Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins with additional C-terminal domains. Half of these PPR proteins have DYW (Aspartate (D), Tyrosine (Y) and Tryptophan (W)) domains, which most likely harbour cytidine deaminase activity. The other half of them, E subclass and E+ subclass proteins, contain no or only a part of the DYW domain. Missing DYW domains in the E and E+ subclass PPR proteins are likely to be complemented by other DYW containing proteins. All target sites of so far characterized E+ subclass PPR proteins show defects in dyw2 mutants, suggesting that the DYW2 protein complements the missing DYW domains in the E+ subclass PPR proteins. Here we report two novel RNA editing factors, MEF46 and MEF47, which belong to E+ and E subclass, respectively. The defective editing site in mef46, nad5-1958, overlaps with the affected sites in dyw2 mutants, while that in mef47, nad3-64 and ccmC-614 do not, further supporting the specific functional connection between E+ subclass PPR proteins and DYW2.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Arabidopsis/genética , Arabidopsis/genética , Mitocondrias/genética , ARN Mensajero/genética , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/química , Regulación de la Expresión Génica de las Plantas , Mutación , Dominios Proteicos , Edición de ARN , ARN Mitocondrial/genética , ARN de Planta/genéticaRESUMEN
C to U editing is one of the post-transcriptional steps which are required for the proper expression of chloroplast and mitochondrial genes in plants. It depends on several proteins acting together which include the PLS-class pentatricopeptide repeat proteins (PPR). DYW2 was recently shown to be required for the editing of many sites in both organelles. In particular almost all the sites associated with the E+ subfamily of PPR proteins are depending on DYW2, suggesting that DYW2 is required for the function of E+-type PPR proteins. Here we strengthened this link by identifying 16 major editing sites controlled by 3 PPR proteins: OTP90, a DYW-type PPR and PGN and MEF37, 2 E+-type PPR proteins. A re-analysis of the DYW2 editotype showed that the 49 sites known to be associated with the 18 characterized E+-type PPR proteins all depend on DYW2. Considering only the 288 DYW2-dependent editing sites as potential E+-type PPR sites, instead of the 795 known editing sites, improves the performances of binding predictions systems based on the PPR code for E+-type PPR proteins. However, it does not compensate for poor binding predictions.
RESUMEN
In terrestrial plants, RNA editing converts specific cytidines to uridines in mitochondrial and plastidic transcripts. Most of these events appear to be important for proper function of organellar encoded genes, since translated proteins from edited mRNAs show higher similarity with evolutionary conserved polypeptide sequences. So far about 100 nuclear encoded proteins have been characterized as RNA editing factors in plant organelles. Respective RNA editing mutants reduce or lose editing activity at different sites and display various macroscopic phenotypes from pale or albino in the case of chloroplasts to growth retardation or even embryonic lethality. Therefore, RNA editing mutants can be a useful resource of surrogate mutants for organellar encoded genes, especially for mitochondrially encoded genes that it is so far unfeasible to manipulate. However, connections between RNA editing defects and observed phenotypes in the mutants are often hard to elucidate, since RNA editing factors often target multiple RNA sites in different genes simultaneously. In this review article, we summarize the physiological aspects of respective RNA editing mutants and discuss them as surrogate mutants for functional analysis of mitochondrially encoded genes.
Asunto(s)
Mitocondrias/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Edición de ARN , Proteínas de Plantas/genética , Plantas/genética , Edición de ARN/genéticaRESUMEN
In plant organelles specific nucleotide motifs at C to U RNA editing sites are recognized by the PLS-class of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, which are additionally characterized by a C-terminal E domain. The PPR elements bind the nucleotides in the target RNA, while the function of the E domain has remained unknown. At most sites RNA editing also requires multiple organellar RNA editing factor (MORF) proteins. To understand how these two types of proteins are involved in RNA editing complexes, we systematically analyzed their protein-protein interactions. In vivo pull-down and yeast two-hybrid assays show that MORF proteins connect with selected PPR proteins. In a loss of function mutant of MORF1, a single amino acid alteration in the conserved MORF domain abrogates interactions with many PLS-class PPR proteins, implying the requirement of direct interaction to PPR proteins for the RNA editing function of MORF1. Subfragment analyses show that predominantly the N-terminal/central regions of the MORF domain in MORF1 and MORF3 bind the PPR proteins. Within the PPR proteins, the E domains in addition to PPR elements contact MORF proteins. In chimeric PPR proteins, different E domains alter the specificity of the interaction with MORF proteins. The selective interactions between E domain containing PPR and MORF proteins suggest that the E domains and MORF proteins play a key role for specific protein complexes to assemble at different RNA editing sites.