RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The WHO recommends that all cases of suspected malaria should undergo parasitological test. Currently, the parasitological test comprises the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) or the microscopy. The performance of RDT in relation to microscopy is yet to be fully comprehended. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of RDT as against the diagnosis provided by microscopy in detecting malaria parasites among febrile under-5 children. DESIGN: The study was a cross-sectional hospital-based design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Capillary blood samples were collected from 167 children who came to the hospital with a history of fever over a period of 6 months. The Paracheck-Pf RDT kit was used and its performance was compared with the gold standard, microscopy using thick film. RESULTS: The prevalence of malaria infection was 41.9%. On comparing RDT with microscopy (microscopy assumed to be 100% sensitive and specific), RDT had a sensitivity of 51.4% and a specificity of 73.2%. The false-positive rate was 26.8% whereas the false-negative rate was 48.6%. The positive predictive value was 58.1% whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) was 67.6%. The RDT also had a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 1.92 and a negative LR of 0.67. The RDT test accuracy was 64.1%. CONCLUSION: Malaria prevalence among febrile children was found to be high. The findings also suggest that inconsistencies in the performance of RDT kits may arise from many extraneous factors, and as such, they should not be used as a stand-alone test kit except a prior batch/lot validation test was carried on them.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a major cause of febrile illness in Nigeria and interventions to reduce malaria burden in Nigeria focus on the use of insecticide-treated nets. This study determined the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) for the control of malaria amongst under-five year old children in Calabar, Nigeria. METHODS: A total of 270 under-5 year old children were recruited and structured questionnaires were used to obtain information on the background characteristics of the respondents from their caregivers. Capillary blood samples were collected from each of the patients through finger-pricking and tested for malaria parasites by Rapid Diagnostic Test and microscopy. RESULTS: An overall parasitaemia prevalence of 32.2% (by Rapid diagnostic test kit [RDT]) and 40.1% (by microscopy) were obtained in this study. Forty-six (45.5%) of the febrile patients had malaria parasitaemia (by RDT) or 41 (59.4%) by microscopy. One hundred and fifty (55.6%) of the caregivers acknowledged the use of nets on doors and windows for malaria prevention and control. One hundred and thirty-nine (51.5%) mentioned sleeping under mosquito net while 138 (51.1%) acknowledged the use of insecticide sprays. Although 191 (71.5%) of the households possessed at least one mosquito net, only 25.4% of the under-5 children slept under any net the night before the survey. No statistically significant reduction in malaria parasitaemia was observed with the use of mosquito nets among the under-5 children. Almost all the respondents (97.8%) identified mosquito bite as the cause of malaria. Fever was identified by the majority of the respondents (92.2%) as the most common symptom of malaria. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study showed high prevalence of parasitaemia and that fever was significantly associated with malaria parasitaemia. Mosquito net utilization among the under-fives was low despite high net ownership rate by households. Therefore, for effective control of malaria, public health education should focus on enlightening the caregivers on signs/symptoms of both uncomplicated and complicated malaria as well as encourage the use of ITNs especially among the under-fives.