RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Disparities in cancer care have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study is to establish how telehealth mitigated the effect of COVID-19 on the healthcare sector and to identify potential disparities in perception and experience with telehealth in cancer care during and after the pandemic. METHODS: We identified individuals with an established cancer diagnosis who received treatment at a comprehensive academic cancer center with a diverse patient population between 2019 and 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were asked to complete a self-administrated survey intended to collect patient-reported outcomes on socioeconomic and mental health challenges incurred during the pandemic as well as participants' experience with telehealth. The assessment was adapted from a 21-question-based survey applied for mental health. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and the response to the survey items. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess and analyze the contributing factors to the survey responses. RESULTS: A total of N = 136 participants were included in this analysis. The majority of participants (60.6%) reported increased anxiety, stress, or experience of distress as a direct result of COVID-19. However, among 54.1% of survey responders participated in a telehealth appointment and 84.4% agreed it was an easy and effective experience. CONCLUSION: Elderly, male, and black participants reported the worst impact related to the pandemic. The majority of patients had a positive experience with telehealth. The results of the study suggest that telehealth services can serve as a tool for patients with cancer during and beyond active treatment to access supportive services.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Composite lymphoma is defined as two or more lymphomas with distinct morphological and immunophenotypical characteristics synchronously diagnosed at the same anatomical site. Composite lymphoma is rare, and the most common combination is follicular lymphoma (FL) associated with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, followed by FL associated with classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Histologically, composite lymphomas display a mixed pattern or distinct zonal distribution of each lymphoma component. Composite lymphoma poses a diagnostic challenge, especially when two lymphoma components are mixed in the same lymph node. Here, we report a case of composite HL and FL 11 years after initial and repeat biopsies consistent with FL in a man in his 70s emphasising the importance of repeat biopsy in lymphoma diagnosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health thoroughly explored in the literature include insurance status, race, and ethnicity. There are over 50 million self-identifying Hispanics in the United States. This, however, represents a heterogeneous population. We used a national registry to investigate for significant differences in outcomes of Hispanic patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Unites states, by geographic region of origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of Hispanic patients in the Unites states with NSCLC for which region of origin was documented within the 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) registry. This included patients from Cuba, Puerto Rico, Mexico, South and Central America, and the Dominican Republic. We performed multivariate logistic regression modeling to determine whether origin was a significant predictor of cancer staging at diagnosis, adjusting for age, sex, histology, grade, insurance status, and facility type. Race was not included due to a nonsignificant association with stage at diagnosis at the bivariate level in this cohort. Subsequently, we used Kaplan-Meier modeling to identify whether overall survival (OS) of Hispanic patients differed by origin. RESULTS: A total of 12,557 Hispanic patients with NSCLC were included in this analysis. The breakdown by origin was as follows: n = 2071 (16.5%) Cuban, n = 2360 (18.8%) Puerto Rican, n = 4950 (39.4%) Mexican, n = 2329 (18.5%) from South or Central America, and n = 847 (6.7%) from the Dominican Republic. After controlling for age, sex, histology, grade, insurance status and treating facility type, we found that geographic origin was a significant predictor of advanced stage at diagnosis (P = .015). Compared to Cubans, patients of Puerto Rican origin were less likely to present with advanced disease (68.4% vs. 71.9%; OR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.69-0.98; P = .026). We also identified a significant (log-rank P-value<.001) difference in OS by geographic origin, even at early-stages of diagnosis. Dominican patients with NSCLC exhibited the highest 5-year OS rate (63.3%), followed by patients from South/Central America (59.7%), Puerto Rico (52.3%), Mexico (45.9%), and Cuba (43.8%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that for Hispanic individuals living in the Unites states, region/country of origin is significantly associated with outcomes, even after accounting for other known determinants of health. We suggest that region of origin should be studied further as a potential determinant of outcomes in patients with cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Mutations in the KRAS gene are the most common gain-of-function mutations found in lung adenocarcinomas. The most common mutation, KRAS G12C, is present in 13% of lung adenocarcinomas. Sotorasib (AMG-510) is an irreversible small molecule inhibitor targeting KRAS G12C. In preclinical studies, treatment with sotorasib led to the regression of KRAS G12C-mutated tumors, and clinical efficacy in NSCLC was demonstrated in clinical trials. In May 2021, sotorasib received US FDA approval for treatment of KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. In this report, we present a case with metastatic, KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC who responded favorably to sotorasib as first-line therapy. The efficacy of sotorasib as first-line treatment in this patient was remarkable, which supports further study of sotorasib as first-line therapy for KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, especially in fragile patients with comorbidities.

RESUMEN

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the scalp is the most common cancer of the skin and is locally invasive. The patched/hedgehog intracellular signaling pathway is responsible for regulating cell growth and tumor formation by inactivating mutation of protein patched homolog 1 (PTCH1) or activating mutation of Smoothened (SMOm). BCC can cause significant morbidity from local destruction if neglected. The risk of metastasis and death is 6.5% in tumors greater than or equal to 2 cm in size. The gold standard treatment is surgical excision. Radiation therapy is used to treat skin cancers as an adjuvant or in patients who are not candidates for surgical intervention or who refuse therapy. It works by using low-energy X-rays or electron beam radiation. They work on the superficial skin and do not affect the organs deeper. Here, we describe the case of a man who presented with an unwitnessed seizure and was found to have a large ulcer on his forehead, which was later diagnosed to be BCC of the scalp eroding the calvarium. The base of the ulcer was the patient's dura and brain. He was successfully treated with electron beam radiation therapy for six weeks with careful preservation of brain tissue. The patient's skin was re-epithelialized and the bone was recalcified. The ulcer on the forehead has completely regressed. This case report and literature review illustrates the evidence to propose the importance of radiation therapy and its potential to be the first-line treatment in BCC, especially in similar cases like ours. Multimodality treatment with a radiation oncologist, dermatologist, and medical oncologist can save patients from devastating outcomes.

RESUMEN

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive inflammatory condition hypothesized to be a T-lymphocyte (T-cell)-mediated immune response that commonly affects females more than males. Given its proposed mechanism associated with immune response, it is more likely to present with other autoimmune conditions, particularly autoimmune disorders associated with the thyroid. AIH can be difficult to diagnose as it is a diagnosis of exclusion. AIH lacks validated algorithms for proper diagnosis and can seldom present with negative antibodies. If not fully worked up, AIH may progress to cirrhosis and even increase the risk of malignancy. Therefore, a liver biopsy is a crucial step in the workup for AIH. We report a rare case of acute severe AIH associated with negative antibodies and undiagnosed Graves' disease.

RESUMEN

Lower gastrointestinal cancers are commonly adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anus. Rectal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare gastrointestinal tract malignancy, as rectal SCC is assumed to be from the migration of anal squamous cells. However, primary rectal SCC is rarer. Here, we present a case of a 63-year-old male who was found to have rectal SCC that was very close to the anus. Through literature review, it was noted that SCC and adenocarcinoma of rectal origin stain positive for cytokeratin CAM 5.2 and not the anal canal lesions. This patient's tumor was positive for CAM 5.2. The patient was treated with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C with radiation therapy for five weeks. The post-therapy repeat PET scan showed complete resolution of the tumor and oligometastasis. Unfortunately, the 20-week follow-up PET CT showed para-aortic and retrocrural lymph nodes consistent with malignancy. This case emphasizes the use of immunohistochemical stains for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with rectal SCC. Once the diagnosis was confirmed, the patient was treated as anal SCC. The importance of differentiating between rectal and anal SCC can be argued, although the treatment is the same; however, the prognosis is worse based on nodal involvement in rectal SCC. Patients with early intervention have a five-year overall disease-free survival of greater than 80%.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the presentation of cervical cancer and the treatment modalities received by the patients at a semi-urban/rural area of Western India with that of published literature from urban centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with cervical cancer who presented at a semi-urban/rural cancer center between 2010 and 2013. A total of 141 patients with the median age of 51 years (25-81) were studied. The demographic and clinical variables included age, annual family income, profession, comorbidities, baseline hemoglobin, prior screening, clinical stage, treatment administered, and complications. The pathological variables included tumor type and grade. RESULTS: In our study, all patients presented with vaginal bleeding. Majority of the patients (51 patients, 37.7%) had Stage 3B disease. Since majority presented at later stages (Stage 3B), chemotherapy-radiotherapy was the most common treatment modality used in our population. On histopathology, 127 patients (90%) had squamous cell carcinoma while 14 patients (10%) had adenocarcinoma. In 96 patients (68%), the tumor grade was not known while it was a high, intermediate, and low grade in 6 (4%), 18 (13%), and 21 (15%) patients, respectively. The follow-up data of our study were not adequate; hence, the long-term survival results could not be presented. CONCLUSION: Patients in rural India setting present at later stages which could be improved by creating awareness, improving their personal hygiene, and adequate screening.