RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this paper are: (a) to determine Canadian family physicians' attitudes towards cognitive screening, (b) to identify what cognitive screening tools are being used, (c) to investigate how they rate these tools' effectiveness and (d) to identify the attributes of an ideal cognitive screening tool for the primary care setting. METHOD: Postal survey questionnaire of a random sample of 249 practicing members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. RESULTS: Response rate was 52%. The majority of physicians 'Agreed' or 'Strongly Agreed' that cognitive impairment assessment is important in primary care (89%), and 'Disagreed' or 'Strongly Disagreed' that it should be left to specialists (92%). However, 35% were undecided when asked if assessment in primary care would lead to better outcomes. The most frequently used assessment tools were Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE), Clock Drawing, Delayed Word Recall, Standardized MMSE and Alternating Sequences, but were mainly rated as only 'Good' in terms of perceived effectiveness. Validity/accuracy was identified as the top attribute of an ideal screening tool. Female physicians were more likely to have a positive attitude towards cognitive assessment. Younger physicians, those in group practices, or those with either

Asunto(s)

Actitud del Personal de Salud , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo , Médicos de Atención Primaria/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Canadá , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rol del Médico , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios