RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Charcot neuroarthropathy is one of the more devastating complications of diabetes. It is a progressive, destructive condition that is characterized by acute fracture, dislocation, and joint destruction in weight-bearing neuropathic foot. In its acute phase, it is often misdiagnosed and can lead to several deformities such as ulcerations and amputation. Early diagnosis and management is, therefore, imperative to avoid rapid progression. OBJECTIVES: Review current literature on the diagnosis and management of diabetic patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. METHODS: Particular attention is directed to the role of surgical management in achieving long term osseous stability and alignment so that appropriate footwear and bracing are possible. CONCLUSION: Charcot neuroarthropathy is a serious and potentially limb-threatening lower extremity late complication of diabetes. Correct timing, adequate fixation and a long post-operative weightbearing period are key to optimizing reconstructive surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Primary care providers who treat diabetic patients should be cognizant of the possible complication among patients with diabetic neuropathy of which includes Charcot neuroarthropathy. In this paper, discussion is provided on a rational approach to functional limb salvage with various surgical techniques when non-operative management fails.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/métodos , Artropatía Neurógena/cirugía , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Artropatía Neurógena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trasplante Óseo , Fijadores Externos , Humanos , Fijadores Internos , RadiografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Residency programs are continually attempting to predict the performance of both current and potential residents. Previous studies have supported the use of USMLE Steps 1 and 2 as predictors of Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) and eventual American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery success, while others show no significant correlation. A strong performance on OITE examinations does correlate with strong residency performance, and some believe OITE scores are good predictors of future written board success. The current study was designed to examine potential differences in resident assessment measures and their predictive value for written boards. DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective review of resident performance data was performed for the past 10 years. Personalized information was removed by the residency coordinator. USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2, Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (from first to fifth years of training), and written orthopaedic specialty board scores were collected. Subsequently, the residents were separated into two groups, those scoring above the 35(th) percentile on written boards and those scoring below. Data were analyzed using correlation and regression analyses to compare and contrast the scores across all tests. RESULTS: A significant difference was seen between the groups in regard to USMLE scores for both Step 1 and 2. Also, a significant difference was found between OITE scores for both the second and fifth years. Positive correlations were found for USMLE Step 1, Step 2, OITE 2 and OITE 5 when compared to performance on written boards. One resident initially failed written boards, but passed on the second attempt This resident consistently scored in the 20(th) and 30(th) percentiles on the in-training examinations. CONCLUSIONS: USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores along with OITE scores are helpful in gauging an orthopaedic resident's performance on written boards. Lower USMLE scores along with consistently low OITE scores likely identify residents at risk of failing their written boards. Close monitoring of the annual OITE scores is recommended and may be useful to identify struggling residents. Future work involving multiple institutions is warranted and would ensure applicability of our findings to other orthopedic residency programs.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Evaluación Educacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Licencia Médica/normas , Ortopedia/educación , Ortopedia/normas , Humanos , Illinois , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome is a rare condition. Only 6 previous cases have been reported in the literature. Two previous cases involved positioning for urological procedures, while the other cited causes of bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome include exercise-induced, trauma, and prolonged immobilization from substance abuse. The 2 previously published reports of bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome associated with urologic positioning were treated conservatively due to late presentation and onset of rhabdomyolysis. This article presents a case of a 61-year-old man who developed bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome following prolonged urologic surgery in a dorsal lithotomy position. Orthopedic evaluation revealed physical examination findings and intracompartment pressures consistent with bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome. He underwent bilateral gluteal compartment fasciotomies. An expansile-type Kocher Langenbach incision was made, extending from lateral to the posterior superior iliac spine inferior to the level of the greater trochanter. The 3 compartments were decompressed bilaterally. At completion, the compartments showed definite objective softening. He was treated with delayed closure of his fasciotomy wounds. He was discharged home on sixth postoperative day 6. His wounds healed without difficulty and he regained normal strength and sensation in his lower extremities. Gluteal compartment syndrome following surgery is a preventable condition. Prevention should center on intraoperative padding and positioning, intraoperative repositioning, and restricting the length of the procedure. Once it is identified, early diagnosis and treatment can prevent long term complications.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales/etiología , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Robótica , Nalgas , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión , Prostatectomía/métodos , Posición Supina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
The purpose of this investigation is to compare the rotational stability of intramedullary rod fixation with blade plate and screw fixation in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Five matched pairs of cadaver ankles were randomly fixated with a lateral blade plate and screws or a retrograde intramedullary nail. The bone mineral density (BMD) for each sample was ascertained. These samples were tested through internal and external rotation of 0.5 degrees/s until 7 N-m was achieved. The torsional stiffness of each specimen was determined from the linear slope of the torque-rotation curve. No statistical difference in internal (p=.11) or external (p=.36) rotation for the matched pairs was noted. Data were excluded from one intramedullary sample secondary to early failure of the tibia. A trend toward increased rotational stability in the intramedullary group versus plate fixation in specimens with lower BMD was observed. These findings suggest no rotational biomechanical advantage of intramedullary nail compared to blade plate fixation in a cadaveric tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis model.