RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As surgeons have become more adept and midterm to long-term results have demonstrated improved patient outcomes, the indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have expanded. This study compares the clinical outcomes and complication rates between patients 65 years and younger and patients 70 years and older undergoing RTSA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort with minimum 2-year follow-up was performed at a single institution. Patient demographic data, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, range of motion, patient satisfaction, notching, and complication rates were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 32 patients (57 ± 4.9 years old) in the 65 years and younger group, whereas 50 patients (76 ± 4.9 years old) were in the 70 years and older group. The mean follow-up time was 3 years (range, 2-8 years). There were no significant differences in preoperative, postoperative, or change in ASES scores between the younger and older groups. Postoperatively, the younger cohort achieved a higher degree (mean) of forward flexion (133° vs. 117°), abduction (127° vs. 110°), and external rotation (40° vs. 27°) (P < .05). The average improvement in forward flexion and external rotation was also found to be larger in the younger cohort (P < .05). The younger and older groups had comparable complication rates, notching rates, and overall satisfaction rates. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes scores and complication rates after RTSA of patients aged 65 years and younger were similar to those of patients aged 70 years and older. However, younger patients were able to achieve increased postoperative range of motion.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CASE: We present a case of isolated Salmonella species group B sacroiliitis in a healthy 19-year-old collegiate-level swimmer with no known risk factors. To our knowledge, there are no similar cases described in the current literature. CONCLUSION: Pyogenic sacroiliitis (PS) is a rare form of septic arthritis, especially in adults. PS is most commonly seen in the setting of intravenous drug use or in an immunocompromised patient. If a patient does not fit either of these demographics, PS initially can be a difficult diagnosis because of its rarity and vague symptomatology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability can be a disabling condition for the young athlete; however, the best surgical treatment remains controversial. Traditionally, anterior shoulder instability was treated with open stabilization. More recently, arthroscopic repair of the Bankart injury with suture anchor fixation has become an accepted technique. HYPOTHESIS: No systematic reviews have compared the rate of return to play following arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchor fixation with the Bristow-Latarjet procedure and open stabilization. We hypothesized that the rate of return to play will be similar regardless of surgical technique. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis focused on return to play following shoulder stabilization. Inclusion criteria included studies in English that reported on rate of return to play and clinical outcomes following primary arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors, the Latarjet procedure, or open stabilization. Statistical analyses included Student t tests and analyses of variance. RESULTS: Sixteen papers reporting on 1036 patients were included. A total of 545 patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors, 353 with the Latarjet procedure, and 138 with open repair. No significant difference was found in patient demographic data among the studies. Patients returned to sport at the same level of play (preinjury level) more consistently following arthroscopic Bankart repair (71%) or the Latarjet procedure (73%) than open stabilization (66%) (P < .05). Return to play at any level and postoperative Rowe scores were not significantly different among studies. Recurrent dislocation was significantly less following the Latarjet procedure (3.5%) than after arthroscopic Bankart repair (6.6%) or open stabilization (6.7%) (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates a greater rate of return to play at the preinjury level following arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure than open stabilization. Despite this difference, >65% of all treated athletes returned to sport at their preinjury levels, with other outcome measures being similar among the treatment groups. Therefore, arthroscopic Bankart repair, the Latarjet procedure, and open stabilization remain good surgical options in the treatment of the athlete with anterior shoulder instability.

RESUMEN

Lateral epicondylitis is a common cause of elbow pain, frequently responsive to nonoperative management. There are multiple operative techniques for persistently symptomatic patients who have exhausted conservative therapies. Little is known regarding US national trends in operative management of lateral epicondylitis. We conducted a study to investigate changes in use of ambulatory procedures for lateral epicondylitis. Cases of lateral epicondylitis were identified using the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery and were analyzed for trends in demographics and use of ambulatory surgery. Between 1994 and 2006, the population-adjusted rate of ambulatory surgical procedures increased from 7.29 to 10.44 per 100,000 capita. The sex-adjusted rate of surgery for lateral epicondylitis increased by 85% among females and decreased by 31% among males. Most patients were between ages 40 and 49 years, and the largest percentage increase in age-adjusted rates was found among patients older than 50 years (275%) between 1994 and 2006. Use of regional anesthesia increased from 17% in 1994 to 30% in 2006. Private insurance remained the most common payer. Awareness of the increasing use of ambulatory surgery for lateral epicondylitis may lead to changes in health care policies and positively affect patient care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 74 consecutive, surgical patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the distribution of hospital and operating room costs incurred during surgical correction of NMS. BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have demonstrated that surgical treatment improves both medical outcomes and the quality of life in patients with progressive NMS. Characterization of the costs incurred at the time of surgery and hospitalization will facilitate the identification of opportunities for cost reduction. METHODS: Demographic data collected included gender, age, preoperative height, weight, and BMI. Major coronal curvatures and T5-T12 kyphosis were assessed from radiographs. Construct type and number of screws, hooks, and wires implanted were recorded. Surgical costs were calculated based on cost of surgical correction, hospital stay, and postoperative care. RESULTS: Mean age was 15.8 ± 7.3 years; 57% were male. Comorbidities included cerebral palsy (28%) and familial dysautonomia (14%). The mean preoperative major curve magnitude was 60°; minor curve magnitude was 33°. Posterior approach (76%) and pedicle screws (75%) were predominantly utilized. The average length of hospitalization was 8 days (range: 3 to 47). There were six major complications (8%). The total surgical cost was $50,096 ± $23,998. The highest individual cost was for implants ($13,916; 24% of total costs). The second highest was inpatient room and ICU costs ($12,483; 22%); bone grafts were the third ($6,398; 11%). Increased major and minor structural curve, increased total (A/P) levels fused, and increased length of hospital stay predicted an increase in total cost. CONCLUSIONS: Major contributors to cost in NMS surgery are implants, inpatient room and ICU costs, and bone grafts. Independent predictors of higher cost are the degree of major and minor structural curve, total number of A/P levels fused, and length of hospital stay. These conclusions provide insight into costs associated with care for a medically fragile and challenging patient population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient and surgical factors are known to influence operative blood loss in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but have only been loosely identified. To date, there are no established recommendations to guide decisions to predonate autologous blood, and the current practice is based primarily on surgeon preference. This study is designed to determine which patient and surgical factors are correlated with, and predictive of, blood loss during spinal fusion for AIS. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 340 (81 males, 259 females; mean age, 15.2 y) consecutive AIS patients treated by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2008. Demographic (sex, age, height, weight, and associated comorbidities), laboratory (hematocrit, platelet, PT/PTT/INR), standard radiographic, and perioperative data including complications were analyzed with a linear stepwise regression to develop a predictive model of blood loss. RESULTS: Estimated blood loss was 907±775 mL for posterior spinal fusion (PSF, n=188), 323±171 mL for anterior spinal fusion (ASF, n=124), and 1277±821 mL for combined procedures (n=28). For patients undergoing PSF, stepwise analysis identified sex, preoperative kyphosis, and operative time to be the most important predictors of increased blood loss (P<0.05). For ASF, the mean arterial pressure at incision and the operative time were predictive (P<0.05). The following formula was developed to estimate blood loss in PSF: blood loss (mL)=C+Op-time (min)×(6.4)-pre-op T2-T12 kyphosis (degrees)×(8.7), C=233 if male and -270 if female. CONCLUSION: We find sex, operative time, and preoperative kyphosis to be the most important predictors of increased blood loss in PSF for AIS. Mean arterial pressure and operative time were predictive of estimated blood loss in ASF. For posterior fusions, we also present a model that estimates blood loss preoperatively and can be used to guide decisions regarding predonation of blood and the use of antifibrinolytic agents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study: Level II.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiographical and clinical profiles between 2 surgical approaches for the correction of sagittal plane spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sagittal plane decompensation is the radiographical parameter that carries the greatest impact on adverse outcomes. Surgical correction methods are heterogeneous, and opposing views pervade the spine community in consideration of the most effective approach and techniques to achieve correction. METHODS: A total of 33 cases with sagittal spinal deformity were assessed according to their surgical approach, posterior only versus combined anteroposterior group. Comparison was based on the demographic data, and radiographical parameters included pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and sagittal vertical axis. RESULTS: Twenty two subjects were identified for the posterior-only and 11 subjects for the anteroposterior group. Average age was 58.7 years in the posterior-only and 55.7 years for the combined approach. Preoperative mean sagittal vertical axis was 186.6 and 147.7 mm, for the posterior-only and combined approaches, respectively (P = 0.1). Preoperative mean pelvic tilt was 34.2° for the posterior-only and 36.9° for the combined approach group (P = 0.5). A greater operative time for the combined approach was significant, 535 versus 333 minutes for the posterior-only approach (P < 0.001). In the posterior-only group, 8 of 22 patients and 7 of 11 patients in the combined-approach cohort experienced a postoperative complication (P = 0.16). The average follow-up was 41.8 and 47.7 months for the posterior-only and combined approaches, respectively (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: A posterior-only or combined surgical approach had comparable radiographical outcomes. Higher morbidity was significant in regard to operative time in the combined-approach group. Deciding on the approach best suited for achieving correction in the sagittal plane likely resides on the surgeon's experience and expertise.

Asunto(s)