RESUMEN
The objective of this workshop was to determine current nursing research priorities in critical care, adult pulmonary, and sleep conditions through input from consumer (patient, family, and formal and informal caregivers) and nursing experts around the world. Working groups composed of nurses and patients selected potential research priorities based on patient insight and a literature review of patient-reported outcomes, patient-reported experiences, and processes and clinical outcomes in the focal areas. A Delphi consensus approach, using a qualitative survey method to elicit expert opinion from nurses and consumers was conducted. Two rounds of online surveys available in English, Spanish, and Chinese were completed. A 75% or greater threshold for endorsement (combined responses from nursing and consumer participants) was determined a priori to retain survey items. A total of 837 participants (649 nurses and 188 patients, family, and/or caregivers) from 45 countries responded. Survey data were analyzed and nursing research priorities that comprise 23 critical care, 45 adult pulmonary, and 16 sleep items were identified. This project was successful in engaging a wide variety of nursing and consumer experts, applying a patient-reported outcome/patient-reported experience framework for organizing and understanding research priorities. The project outcome was a research agenda to inform, guide, and aid nurse scientists, educators, and providers, and to advise agencies that provide research and program funding in these fields.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Investigación en Enfermería Clínica/organización & administración , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Pacientes/psicología , Adulto , Consenso , Cuidados Críticos , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Política de Salud , Prioridades en Salud , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/organización & administración , Neumología , Sueño , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To explore nurse' role in recognising and responding to deteriorating post-operative patients. BACKGROUND: Clinical deterioration is a significant problem in acute care settings. Nurses play a vital role in post-operative patient monitoring; however, there is limited understanding of the nurses' role in recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in surgical patients. METHODS: This qualitative exploratory study was conducted at a metropolitan teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data were collected through focus groups from 1 September to 31 October 2014. Four focus groups of 2-5 surgical nurses (n = 14) were conducted to explore the nurses' perception of their role in managing deterioration over the first 72 hr postoperatively. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed and key themes identified. RESULTS: Nurses demonstrated a high level of awareness of their role in recognising and responding to early signs of deterioration. The themes that arose from the focus group interviews were "struggling with blood pressure," and "we know our patient is sick." The nurses were confident about the clinical indicators of deterioration and the appropriate channels to use to escalate care. Using track and trigger observation charts enabled nurses to identify deteriorating patients prior to the patient fulfilling rapid response system escalation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of a collective team approach to preventing, recognising and responding to clinical deterioration across the whole patient journey. Initiatives to ensure accurate written and verbal communication between medical and nursing staff warrants further assessment. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses working in acute surgical wards are highly engaged in the process of recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in post-operative patients. Many nurses reported being able to anticipate deterioration occurring but are required by current organisational frameworks to escalate care to rapid response systems. How nurses anticipate and manage deterioration prior to the patient fulfilling rapid response system criteria warrants further investigation.