RESUMEN
The potential extractability, crop uptake, and ecotoxicity of conventional and emerging organic and metal(loid) contaminants after the application of pre-treated (composted and pyrolysed) sewage sludges to two agricultural soils were evaluated at field and laboratory scale. Metal(loid) extractability varied with sludge types and pre-treatments, though As, Cu, and Ni decreased universally. In the field, the equivalent of 5 tons per hectare of both composted and pyrolysed sludges brought winter wheat grain metal(loid) concentrations below statutory limits. Carbamazepine, diclofenac, and telmisartan were the only detected organic pollutants in crops decreasing in order of root > shoot > grains, whilst endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as bisphenol A and perfluorochemicals were heavily reduced by composting (up to 71%) or pyrolysis (up to below detection limit) compared to raw sludges. As a consequence, no detectable concentrations were measured in soils 12 months after field application. This study highlights the potential advantages of processing sewage sludge before soil applications, especially in the context of reducing the mobility of emerging contaminants, though further studies are required on a broad range of soils and crops before land application can be considered.
RESUMEN
With the growing emphasis on environmental protection, the ways of sewage sludge treatment are changing. In this review, we analyse different methods of sewage sludge treatment in terms of potential environmental risk and raw materials recovery. The review begins with a comparison and assessment of existing reviews on this topic. Then, it focuses on the properties and current utilisation of sewage sludge in agriculture and a brief description of sludge thermal treatment methods (mono- and co-incineration, pyrolysis, and gasification). The final part of the review is devoted to technologies for treating sludge ash from mono-incinerators to recover phosphorus, a substance listed as a critical raw material by the EU. Our results show that direct use of sewage sludge likewise composts containing sewage sludge should no longer be considered as a direct source of nutrients and organic matter in agriculture, because of its pollutant content. Co-incineration and landfilling represent a dead-end in sludge treatment due to the loss of raw materials, whereas pyrolysis is sustainable for remote locations with low heavy metal content sludge. Heavy metals also pose a problem for the direct use of sludge ash and must be therefore removed. There are already sludge ash processing technologies that are capable of processing ash to form a variety of raw materials such as phosphorus. These regeneration approaches are currently in their infancy, but are gradually being introduced. The sewage sludge treatment industry is rapidly evolving, and we have attempted to summarise and discuss the current state of knowledge in this review, which will provide a baseline towards the future of sewage sludge suitable treatment.