RESUMEN

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the US and globally. The mortality from lung cancer has been declining, due to a reduction in incidence and advances in treatment. Although recent success in developing targeted and immunotherapies for lung cancer has benefitted patients, it has also expanded the complexity of potential treatment options for health care providers. To aid in reducing such complexity, experts in oncology convened a conference (Bridging the Gaps in Lung Cancer) to identify current knowledge gaps and controversies in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of various lung cancer scenarios, as described here. Such scenarios relate to biomarkers and testing in lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutations and targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), early-stage NSCLC, KRAS/BRAF/MET and other genomic alterations in NSCLC, and immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

RESUMEN

Background: Acquired mutations within bypass pathways including BRAF V600E have been observed in post-osimertinib progression in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib is currently Food and Drug Administration-approved in BRAF V600E-mutant NSCLC. However, the application of osimertinib and dabrafenib and trametinib in the setting of acquired BRAF V600E mutation resistance from osimertinib therapy has not been clearly defined. In this case series, we evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of continued osimertinib in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF V600E acquired EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Case Description: We retrospectively reviewed our clinical patient cohort at the University of California San Diego and patients from published case studies. Individuals who had metastatic EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with osimertinib at any line whom subsequently developed an acquired BRAF V600E mutation confirmed by next-generation sequencing were included for analysis. All patients had subsequent dabrafenib and trametinib in combination with osimertinib after detection of the novel BRAF V600E mutation post-osimertinib therapy. We identified three cases from our practice and nine cases from literature review. In our study cohort (n=12), we observed a median progression-free survival of 7 months on triplet therapy (osimertinib, dabrafenib, and trametinib) post progression on osimertinib, median overall survival of 46.2 months, and 60% partial response on first scan after treatment initiation. Dose reductions were required in 5/12 patients due to adverse events and treatment discontinuation in 2/12 patients. The most common adverse events were pyrexia and rash, and two cases of pneumonitis were observed (grade 1 & unreported grade). Conclusions: We concluded that the addition of combination dabrafenib and trametinib can be tolerable and effective in patients with acquired BRAF V600E mutation post progression on osimertinib. This study supports molecular profiling at osimertinib progression and provides additional information on the appropriate sequencing of targeted therapies in the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance setting.

RESUMEN

Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma homolog (KRAS) mutations are one of the key drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and FDA-approved specific inhibitors of KRAS-G12C mutation are available clinically. However, inhibitors of certain KRAS mutation subtypes remain unavailable, especially rare KRAS mutations including G13C, G13D, and Q61H. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the outcomes of NSCLC patients with rare KRAS-mutation to determine if they may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: Our retrospective study involved 240 advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations, who visited Shanghai Chest Hospital from July 2018 to July 2021. Complete clinical and pathological data were recorded and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were adopted as primary endpoints. Results: The median follow-up time was 36.5 months (range, 30.8-42.1 months) and the median OS was 9.7 months (range, 7.6-11.8 months). Of the 240 patients evaluated, 130 (54.2%) received chemotherapy and 110 (45.8%) received ICI-based treatment. Among the patients who received chemotherapy, patients with rare KRAS-mutations presented worse survival outcomes (median PFS, 3.4 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.047; median OS, 5.2 vs. 7.1 months, P=0.02) than conventional KRAS-mutant patients. PFS and OS of rare KRAS-mutation patients were prolonged after immunotherapy (median PFS 7.3 vs. 3.4 months, P<0.001; median OS, 13.3 vs. 5.2 months, P<0.001) and had no significant difference compared with conventional KRAS-mutant patients, in part of them whose programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression data before immunotherapy were available (n=72), patients with a higher rate of PD-L1 positive tumor cells (≥50%) presented elevated PFS and OS. Conclusions: Despite having potential survival disadvantage compared with other NSCLC patients, rare KRAS-mutant patients (other than G12A, C, D, V) could benefit specifically from ICI-based therapy and survival outcomes are correlated with PD-L1 expression.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: KRAS is the most commonly mutated driver oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sotorasib and adagrasib, KRASG12C inhibitors, have been granted accelerated US approval; however, hepatotoxicity is a common side effect with higher rates in patients treated with sotorasib proximal to checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of adagrasib after discontinuation of sotorasib because of treatment-related grade 3 hepatotoxicity through real-world and clinical cases. METHODS: Medical records from five patients treated in real-world settings were retrospectively reviewed. Patients had locally advanced or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC and received adagrasib after sotorasib in the absence of extracranial disease progression. Additional data were collected for 12 patients with KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC enrolled in a phase Ib cohort of the KRYSTAL-1 study and previously treated with sotorasib. The end points associated with both drugs included timing and severity of hepatotoxicity, best overall response, and duration of therapy. RESULTS: All patients were treated with CPIs followed by sotorasib (initiated 0-64 days after CPI). All five real-world patients experienced hepatotoxicity with sotorasib that led to treatment discontinuation, whereas none experienced treatment-related hepatotoxicity with subsequent adagrasib treatment. Three patients from KRYSTAL-1 transitioned from sotorasib to adagrasib because of hepatotoxicity; one experienced grade 3 ALT elevation on adagrasib that resolved with therapy interruption and dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Adagrasib may have a distinct hepatotoxicity profile from sotorasib and is more easily combined with CPIs either sequentially or concurrently. These differences may be used to inform clinical decisions regarding an initial KRASG12C inhibitor for patients who recently discontinued a CPI or experience hepatotoxicity on sotorasib.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Liquid biopsy (LBx) for tumor profiling is increasingly used, but concerns remain regarding negative results. A lack of results may truly reflect tumor genomics, or it may be a false negative that would be clarified by tissue testing. A method of distinguishing between these scenarios could help clarify when follow-on tissue testing is valuable. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Here we evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tumor fraction (TF), a quantification of ctDNA in LBx samples, for utility in identifying true negative results. We assessed concordance between LBx and tissue-based results, stratified by ctDNA TF, in a real-world genomic dataset of paired samples across multiple disease types. We also evaluated the frequency of tissue results identifying driver alterations in patients with lung cancer after negative LBx in a real-world clinicogenomic database. RESULTS: The positive percent agreement and negative predictive value between liquid and tissue samples for driver alterations increased from 63% and 66% for all samples to 98% and 97% in samples with ctDNA TF ≥1%. Among 505 patients with lung cancer with no targetable driver alterations found by LBx who had subsequent tissue-based profiling, 37% had a driver, all of which had ctDNA TF <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lung cancer with negative LBx and ctDNA TF ≥1% are unlikely to have a driver detected on confirmatory tissue testing; such informative negative results may benefit instead from prompt treatment initiation. Conversely, negative LBx with ctDNA TF <1% will commonly have a driver identified by follow-up tissue testing and should be prioritized for reflex testing.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: In the phase 3 FLAURA trial, osimertinib was compared with first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib showed longer progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and a similar safety profile. However, more studies demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of osimertinib as a first-line strategy are needed in real-world populations. Methods: We enrolled 1,556 patients with EGFR-mutated stage IIIc-IV NSCLC from the CAPTRA-Lung database. All patients received either osimertinib (n=202) or a first-generation EGFR-TKI (n=1,354) as their initial treatment. To adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between two groups, 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Propensity scores included gender, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, smoking history, family history of tumor, pathology, EGFR mutations, and central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The standardized mean differences (SMD) before and after PSM were calculated to examine the balance of covariate distributions between two groups. Results: After PSM, 202 patients receiving osimertinib and 404 patients receiving first-generation EGFR-TKIs were finally identified. SMD of each matched variable is less than 0.10. The median PFS was 19.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.3-24.4] in the osimertinib arm and 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.3-12.5) in the comparator arm [hazard ratio (HR) for progression, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.38-0.59; P<0.001). The median OS was 40.5 months (95% CI: 27.1-54.0) vs. 34.3 months (95% CI: 30.6-38.0) in two groups, respectively (HR for death, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58-1.00; P=0.045). The incidence of grade 3 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups was 1% and 4.2%, respectively. No grade 4 AEs and treatment-related deaths were reported in both groups. Conclusions: In real-world settings, osimertinib demonstrates longer PFS and OS, with a similar safety profile to that of comparator EGFR-TKIs when used as a first-line strategy in NSCLC patients.

RESUMEN

Background: The optimal timing of intubation has been debated among healthcare professionals, current studies do not show any differences between early and late intubation. most studies failed to show any significant difference in clinical outcomes between early or late intubation. Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective review of subjects with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the Dubai Hospital intensive care unit (ICU). Study variables included time to intubation, duration of supplemental oxygen requirement >15 L/min, and cumulative duration of tachypnea and tachycardia while on the aforementioned oxygen requirement on this oxygen usage level. Each time duration was assessed for correlation with clinical variables including mortality and length of stay in ICU and hospital. Results: Subjects who require endotracheal intubation within 4 h after the start of oxygen >15 L/min have lower survival (P = 0.03). Subjects who have tachypnea on the aforementioned oxygen requirement for 6-19.5 h (P = 0.01) before they require intubation have better survival. No duration of tachycardia has any significant effect on survival. Only the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) correlated with the hospital length of stay. Conclusions: Subjects who require endotracheal intubation within 4 h after the start of oxygen >15 L/min have lower survival. The optimal time for intubation is after tachypnea of 6 h but before 19.5 h. No duration of tachycardia has any significant effect on survival. Only the duration of invasive MV correlated with the hospital length of stay.

RESUMEN

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the global most common chronic liver disease. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), an inflammatory subtype of NAFLD, has been shown to significantly increase the risk of colorectal adenoma (CRA). Therefore, from the perspective of bioinformatics analysis, the potential mechanisms of NASH/NAFLD-CRA can be explored. Methods: In this study, we screened the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and core effect pathways between NASH and CRA by analyzing the single-cell data of CRA patients and the high-throughput sequencing data (GSE37364 and GSE89632) in the online database. We screened therapeutic targets and biomarkers through gene function classification, pathway enrichment analysis, and protein-protein interaction network analysis. In terms of single cell data, we screened the core effect pathway and specific signal pathway of cell communication through cell annotation and cell communication analyses. The purpose of the study was to find potential biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and related effect pathways of NASH-CRA. Results: NASH-CRA comorbidities were concentrated in inflammatory regulation-related pathways, and the core genes of disease progression included IL1B, FOSL1, EGR1, MYC, PTGS2, and FOS. The results suggested the key pathway of NASH-CRA might be the WNT pathway. The main cell signal communication pathways included WNT2B - (FZD6 + LRP5) and WNT2B - (FZD6 + LRP6). The send-receive process occurred in embryonic stem cells. Conclusions: The core genes of NASH-CRA (FOS, EGR1, MYC, PTGS2, FOSL1, and IL1B) may participate in inflammation and immune responses through up-regulation in the process of disease occurrence, interfering with the pathophysiological process of CRA and NASH. NASH-CRA produces cell signal communication in the WNT pathway sent by WNT2B and received by FZD6, LRP5, and LRP6 in embryonic stem cells. These findings may help formulate early diagnosis and treatment strategies for CRA in NAFLD/NASH patients, and further explore corresponding prognostic markers and potential approaches. The significance of scRNA-seq in exploring tumor heterogeneity lies in promoting our understanding of the expression program of tumor related genes in tumor development patterns. However, the biggest challenge is that this analysis may miss out on some biologically significant gene expression programs.

RESUMEN

Introduction: EGFR mutations drive a subset of NSCLC. Patients harboring the common EGFR mutations, deletion of exon 19 and L858R, respond well to osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Nevertheless, the effect of osimertinib on NSCLC with atypical EGFR mutations is not well described. This multicenter retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of osimertinib among patients with NSCLC harboring atypical EGFR mutations. Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with osimertinib, harboring at least one atypical EGFR mutation, excluding concurrent deletion of exon 19, L858R, or T790M mutations, from six U.S. academic cancer centers were included. Baseline clinical characteristics were collected. The primary end point was the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) of osimertinib. Objective response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 was also assessed. Results: A total of 50 patients with NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations were identified. The most frequent EGFR mutations were L861Q (40%, n = 18), G719X (28%, n = 14), and exon 20 insertion (14%, n = 7). The median TTD of osimertinib was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-12.9 mo) overall and 10.7 months (95% CI: 3.2-18.1 mo) in the first-line setting (n = 20). The objective response rate was 31.7% (95% CI: 18.1%-48.1%) overall and 41.2% (95% CI: 18.4%-67.1%) in the first-line setting. The median TTD varied among patients with L861Q (17.2 mo), G719X (7.8 mo), and exon 20 insertion (1.5 mo) mutations. Conclusions: Osimertinib has activity in patients with NSCLC harboring atypical EGFR mutations. Osimertinib activity differs by the type of atypical EGFR-activating mutation.

RESUMEN

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is receiving more and more attention for its role in tumor screening and disease surveillance in cancer patients. However, it is unclear whether ctDNA can be used to predict recurrence and metastasis in patients after radical resection due to the resulting lower tumor burden. The published literature on postoperative ctDNA levels is also currently limited. Case Description: In this article, we report a rare case in which ctDNA accurately predicted relapse, disease progression and mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in adjuvant setting in an EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patient. The 49-year-old male patient was a current smoker and denied any family history. Chest computed tomography (CT) scans revealed a 5.7×4.3 mass in the left upper lobe. He received adjuvant gefitinib after surgery for a stage IIIB (pT3N2M0) pulmonary adenocarcinoma. The ctDNA detection showed that the EGFR exon 19 deletion (EGFR del19) gene mutation frequencies decreased gradually and even disappeared. However, 8 months after the operation, the EGFR del19 mutation re-emerged in the blood, accompanied by a newly emerged solitary nodule (2 mm) that was later confirmed to be metastatic. Soon afterward, ctDNA detection revealed the EGFR T790M mutation, and the mediastinal lymph nodes rapidly enlarged. The patient's treatment was switched to Osimertinib and the ctDNA detection results showed the EGFR T790M gene mutation frequencies steadily decreased to zero. During the treatment period, ctDNA detection accurately predicted each change in disease burden and revealed genotype alterations. The patient ultimately developed severe metastases in the liver after developing resistance to Osimertinib. Conclusions: This report suggests that ctDNA help monitor disease recurrence and identify genotypes in patients undergoing postoperative adjuvant EGFR-TKI therapy. More clinical researches are needed to support ctDNA is a promising tool for predicting disease progressive.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly adopted in the management of solid tumors, concurrent with increased availability of more comprehensive ctDNA panels. However, variable ctDNA shed can result in variable assay sensitivity. We studied the relationship between ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) and detection of actionable alterations across cancer types. METHODS: A total of 23,482 liquid biopsies (LBx) submitted between September 2020 and October 2021 were sequenced using a hybrid capture panel that reports genomic alterations (GAs) and genomic biomarkers across 324 cancer-related genes. The primary end points were the prevalence of targetable GAs by cancer type and detection in relationship to ctDNA TF. Sensitivity of detection in LBx was assessed in 1,289 patients with available tissue results. RESULTS: 94% (n = 22,130) of LBx had detectable ctDNA, with a median TF of 2.2%. LBx profiling detected GAs in National Comprehensive Cancer Network category 1 genes in 37% of lung, 30% of prostate, 36% of breast, and 51% of colon cancer cases. Potential germline GAs flagged on clinical reports were detected in genes including BRCA1/2, PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM. Polyclonal mutations in genes associated with resistance such as AR, ESR1, RB1, and NF1 were detected. The sensitivity of LBx to detect driver alterations identified in tissue biopsy from the same patient ranged from 58% to 86% but was consistently at or near 100% in cases with TF ≥ 10%. CONCLUSION: Elevated ctDNA shed is associated with both high sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of actionable GAs. The presence of elevated TF suggests adequate tumor profiling and may reduce the value of subsequent reflex to confirmatory tissue testing in patients with negative LBx results.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This Phase 1/2 study (NCT02349633) explored the safety and antitumor activity of PF-06747775 (oral, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after progression on an EGFR inhibitor. METHODS: Phase 1 was a dose-escalation study of PF-06747775 monotherapy (starting dose: 25 mg once daily [QD]). Phase 1b/2 evaluated PF-06747775 monotherapy at recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D; Cohort 1); PF-06747775 200 mg QD plus palbociclib (starting dose: 100 mg QD orally; Cohort 2A); and PF-06747775 monotherapy at RP2D in a Japanese lead-in cohort. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were treated. Median treatment duration was 40.1 weeks. Monotherapy maximum tolerated dose was not determined. Two patients in Cohort 2A had dose-limiting toxicities. The monotherapy RP2D was estimated to be 200 mg QD. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (69.2%), paronychia (69.2%), and rash (60.0%). Most AEs were grades 1-3. Overall, objective response rate (90% confidence interval [CI]) was 41.5% (31.2-52.5%). Median (range) duration of response was 11.09 (2.70-34.57) months. Median progression-free survival (90% CI) was 8.1 (5.4-23.3) months. CONCLUSIONS: PF-06747775 had a manageable safety profile and the study design highlights important considerations for future anti-EGFR agent development.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Anlotinib demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo as a third-line or subsequent therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the ALTER0303 trial. The status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, different previous treatment may affect the efficacy of subsequent therapy, and we did this subgroup analysis to characterize the efficacy of anlotinib in patients with and without EGFR mutation. Methods: The ALTER0303 trial was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of anlotinib in patients with NSCLC who failed at least 2 lines of treatment. In the study, 138 of 437 randomized patients were EGFR mutation positive. A Cox model was used to examine the influence of previous treatment on the efficacy of anlotinib according to EGFR mutation status. Results: For patients with EGFR mutation, the OS was 10.7 and 6.3 months (HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38-0.94, P=0.025) in the anlotinib and placebo group, respectively. The PFS was 5.6 and 0.8 months (HR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.13-0.32, P<0.0001) in the anlotinib and placebo group, respectively. For patients without EGFR mutation, the OS was 8.9 months for anlotinib and 6.5 months for placebo (HR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.55-0.97, P=0.029), and the PFS was 5.4 months for anlotinib and 1.6 months for placebo (HR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.22-0.39, P<0.0001). In the anlotinib group, the OS and PFS for patients with and without EGFR mutation was 10.7 and 8.9 months (HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50-0.95, P=0.021), 5.6 and 5.4 months (HR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.75-1.34, P=1.000), respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar in subgroups. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated that the benefit of anlotinib as a third-line therapy for patients with NSCLC was independent of EGFR mutation status.

RESUMEN

Introduction: This multicenter review evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib dose escalation for central nervous system (CNS) progression developing on osimertinib 80 mg in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Methods: Retrospective review identified 105 patients from eight institutions with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib 160 mg daily between October 2013 and January 2020. Radiographic responses were clinically assessed, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used. We defined CNS disease control as the interval from osimertinib 160 mg initiation to CNS progression or discontinuation of osimertinib 160 mg. Results: Among 105 patients treated with osimertinib 160 mg, 69 were escalated for CNS progression, including 24 treated with dose escalation alone (cohort A), 34 who received dose-escalated osimertinib plus concurrent chemotherapy and/or radiation (cohort B), and 11 who received osimertinib 160 mg without any prior 80 mg exposure. The median duration of CNS control was 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-5.8) in cohort A, 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.1-6.5) in cohort B, and 4.2 months (95% CI 1.6-not reached) in cohort C. Across all cohorts, the median duration of CNS control was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1-9.0) in isolated leptomeningeal progression (n = 27) and 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.0-3.1) among those with parenchymal-only metastases (n = 23). Patients on osimertinib 160 mg experienced no severe or unexpected side effects. Conclusion: Among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC experiencing CNS progression on osimertinib 80 mg daily, dose escalation to 160 mg provided modest benefit with CNS control lasting approximately 3 to 6 months and seemed more effective in patients with isolated leptomeningeal CNS progression.

RESUMEN

Background: KRAS gene mutations are the most common driver oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted an analysis of the immunological characteristics including tumor mutation burden and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of different subtypes of KRAS in 2880 KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients. Methods: A total of 2,880 patients with NSCLC were included in the study. Somatic mutation data were provided by Berry Oncology (Fujian, China), Geneplus BioTech (Beijing, China), Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc (Nanjing, China), and Burning Rock Biotech (Guangzhou, China). Z-scores were used to unify all data. SPSS 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) software was used for statistical analyses. All scatter plots and boxplot maps were drawn using GraphPad Prism 8. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) expression was defined by the number of somatic mutations. The PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit was used to measure the expression level of PD-L1. Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We identified 2,880 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. The percentage level of TMB and expression of PD-L1 was significantly decreased in KRAS Q61X-mutant lung cancer tissue and blood samples (n=162). The percentage level of TMB and expression of PD-L1 in KRAS G13X-mutant lung cancer specimens was significantly increased (n=190). Conclusions: The findings demonstrate a decreased level of TMB and expression of PD-L1 in KRAS Q61X-mutant lung cancer and the increased level of TMB and expression of PD-L1 in KRAS G13X-mutant lung cancer. Further work is needed to identify if the subtype of KRAS mutation could be a potential therapeutic biomarker in lung cancer patients with KRAS mutation. TMB data was consistently verified in tissue and blood samples and confirmed the feasibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) verification in plasma samples. Our research may help to provide more individualized treatment options for NSCLC patients.

RESUMEN

Cancers harboring mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma homolog (KRAS) gene have been associated with poor prognosis and lack of targeted therapies. KRAS mutations occur in approximately one in four patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS G12C mutations harbored at approximately 11-16%. Research into KRAS-driven tumors and analytical chemistry have borne a new class of selective small molecules against the KRAS G12C isoform. Phase II data for sotorasib (AMG510) has demonstrated a 37.1% overall response rate (ORR). Adagrasib (MRTX849) has demonstrated a 45% ORR in an early study. While single agent efficacy has been seen, initial data suggest combination approaches are an opportunity to improve outcomes. Here, we present perspectives on the initial progress in targeting KRAS G12C, examine co-mutations evident in KRAS G12C NSCLC, and comment on potential future combinatorial approaches including SHP2, SOS1, MEK, EGFR, mTOR, CDK, and checkpoint blockade which are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. As of May 28, 2021, sotorasib has achieved US FDA approval for patients with KRAS G12C mutant lung cancer after one line of a prior therapy.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in detecting mutations and monitoring treatment response has not been well studied beyond a few actionable biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the usefulness of ctDNA analysis compare with that of solid tumor biopsy analysis in patients with NSCLC? METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 370 adult patients with NSCLC treated at the City of Hope between November 2015 and August 2019 to assess the usefulness of ctDNA in mutation identification, survival, concordance with matched tissue samples in 32 genes, and tumor evolution. RESULTS: A total of 1,688 somatic mutations were detected in 473 ctDNA samples from 370 patients with NSCLC. Of the 473 samples, 177 showed at least one actionable mutation with currently available Food and Drug Administration-approved NSCLC therapies. MET and CDK6 amplifications co-occurred with BRAF amplifications (false discovery rate [FDR], < 0.01), and gene-level mutations were mutually exclusive in KRAS and EGFR (FDR, 0.0009). Low cumulative percent ctDNA levels were associated with longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.85; P = .006). Overall survival was shorter in patients harboring BRAF mutations (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.24-4.6; P = .009), PIK3CA mutations (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.56-4.9; P < .001) and KRAS mutations (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.30-4.1; P = .004). Gene-level concordance was 93.8%, whereas the positive concordance rate was 41.6%. More mutations in targetable genes were found in ctDNA than in tissue biopsy samples. Treatment response and tumor evolution over time were detected in repeated ctDNA samples. INTERPRETATION: Although ctDNA analysis exhibited similar usefulness to tissue biopsy analysis, more mutations in targetable genes were missed in tissue biopsy analyses. Therefore, the evaluation of ctDNA in conjunction with tissue biopsy samples may help to detect additional targetable mutations to improve clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC.

Asunto(s)