RESUMEN
Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) can generate electrical energy from the oxidation of the organic matter, but they must be demonstrated at large scales, treat real wastewaters, and show the required performance needed at a site to provide a path forward for this technology. Previous pilot-scale studies of MFC technology have relied on systems with aerated catholytes, which limited energy recovery due to the energy consumed by pumping air into the catholyte. In the present study, we developed, deployed, and tested an 850 L (1400 L total liquid volume) air-cathode MFC treating domestic-type wastewater at a centralized wastewater treatment facility. The wastewater was processed over a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 12 h through a sequence of 17 brush anode modules (11 m2 total projected anode area) and 16 cathode modules, each constructed using two air-cathodes (0.6 m2 each, total cathode area of 20 m2) with the air side facing each other to allow passive air flow. The MFC effluent was further treated in a biofilter (BF) to decrease the organic matter content. The field test was conducted for over six months to fully characterize the electrochemical and wastewater treatment performance. Wastewater quality as well as electrical energy production were routinely monitored. The power produced over six months by the MFC averaged 0.46 ± 0.35 W (0.043 W m-2 normalized to the cross-sectional area of an anode) at a current of 1.54 ± 0.90 A with a coulombic efficiency of 9%. Approximately 49 ± 15 % of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was removed in the MFC alone as well as a large amount of the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) (70%) and total suspended solid (TSS) (48%). In the combined MFC/BF process, up to 91 ± 6 % of the COD and 91 % of the BOD5 were removed as well as certain bacteria (E. coli, 98.9%; fecal coliforms, 99.1%). The average effluent concentration of nitrate was 1.6 ± 2.4 mg L-1, nitrite was 0.17 ± 0.24 mg L-1 and ammonia was 0.4 ± 1.0 mg L-1. The pilot scale reactor presented here is the largest air-cathode MFC ever tested, generating electrical power while treating wastewater.
Asunto(s)
Fuentes de Energía Bioeléctrica , Fuentes de Energía Bioeléctrica/microbiología , Electricidad , Electrodos , Escherichia coli , Aguas Residuales/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Reuse of water requires the removal of contaminants to ensure human health. We report the relative estrogenic activity (REA) of reuse treatment design scenarios for water, wastewaters, and processed wastewaters before and after pilot-scale treatment systems tested at select military facilities. The comparative relationships between REA, several composite toxicological endpoints, and spectroscopic indicators were evaluated for different reuse treatment trains. Four treatment processes including conventional and advanced treatments reduced the estrogenicity by at least 33%. Biologically based methods reduced estrogenicity to below detection levels. Conventional treatment scenarios led to significantly less reduction of adverse biological endpoints compared to the advanced treatment scenarios. Incorporating the anaerobic membrane bioreactor reduced more endpoints with higher reduction percentages compared to the sequencing batch reactor design. Membrane technology and advanced oxidation generated reductions across all biological endpoints, from 65% (genotoxicity) to 100% (estrogenicity). The design scenarios featuring a low-cutoff mechanical screen filter, intermittent activated carbon biofilter, and membrane filtration achieved the highest percent reduction and produced water with the lowest negative biological endpoints. Spectroscopic indicators demonstrated case-specific relationships with estrogenicity and toxicity. Estrogenicity consistently correlated with cytotoxicity and thiol reactivity, indicating the potential for preliminary estrogenicity screening using thiol reactivity.
Asunto(s)
Instalaciones Militares , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Purificación del Agua , Humanos , Prohibitinas , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos , Aguas Residuales , Agua , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidadRESUMEN
Drinking water utilities will increasingly rely on alternative water sources in the future, including wastewater reuse. Safety must be assured in the application of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and supporting treatments for wastewater effluent reuse. This study developed toxicological profiles for source and tap waters, wastewaters, and treated effluents by different processes from four military installation locations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of extracted organics from diverse source waters and after reuse treatments. The toxicity analyses included thiol reactivity, mammalian cell cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity. Differences in toxicity between source or tap waters and effluents from wastewater treatment processes supported AOP treatment to reduce risks of potable reuse. An anoxic and aerobic activated sludge process followed by sand filtration controlled toxicity to levels similar to a municipal drinking water. An anaerobic membrane bioreactor process exceeded the toxicity levels of a typical drinking water. Two AOP processes (ultraviolet (UV) + reverse osmosis (RO) + chlorination (NaOCl) or RO + UV-H2O2 + NaOCl) significantly reduced toxicity. The integration of the wastewater systems with ultrafiltration, AOP, and RO was effective to reduce the toxicity to levels comparable to, or better than, tap water samples.