RESUMEN
Objective: The surgical management of tumors of the esophagogastric junction is increasingly performed by minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. However, gastroplasty is not always feasible. The creation of a long loop is an alternative for esophageal reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility of using a minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach in esophagojejunostomy and to describe the contraindications for gastroplasty. Methods: All patients who had intrathoracic esophagojejunostomy in our center were identified in our database. Since 2016, the preferred approach for intrathoracic esophagojejunostomy is minimally invasive laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, using a long Roux-en-Y jejunal loop with a semimechanical triangular anastomosis technique. Results: Between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2022, 12 patients who had esophagojejunostomy in our center were included in the study. Among them, 6 had thoracotomy and 6 had total minimally invasive thoracoscopy, representing 3.5% of surgical procedures for esophagogastric junction tumors since 2016. The mean operative time was 416.9 ± 107.47 minutes. No anastomotic leakage was observed in the minimally invasive group versus 2 leakages in the thoracotomy group. The main complication was pneumonia in 3 patients (27.3%). Finally, the main indication for intrathoracic esophagojejunostomy was tumor size with a mean of 4.72 ± 2.35 cm and the patient's surgical history. Conclusion: A total minimally invasive approach using a long jejunal loop with triangular anastomosis could be a feasible and reproducible alternative to gastroplasty to restore continuity in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy when the stomach cannot be used.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Gastroplastia , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Toracoscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMEN
Introduction : At least one preoperative shower is recommended to avoid surgical site infection. Caregivers must explain the showering technique, help the patient if necessary, and assess skin cleanliness after showering.Context : Showering may be more difficult for obese patients because of inadequate equipment and difficulties moving, as well as insufficient explanation regarding the showering technique and an insufficient skin cleanliness assessment from caregivers.Objective : to assess whether patients and/or caregivers report difficulties in the preoperative shower process that could be linked to patient obesity. Methods : pilot qualitative survey with semi-structured interviews conducted with 9 obese surgery patients and 11 surgery caregivers.Results : Patients did not report feelings of discrimination. They described no problem with equipment, but declared having received little explanation on the showering technique and no visual skin cleanliness assessment. Caregivers reported equipment as inadequate, they stated having delivered detailed information, but found the skin cleanliness assessment difficult.Discussion : The lack of skin cleanliness assessment by caregivers after preoperative showering is new information. Limits : preliminary study with a small number of interviews and no non-obese patients.Conclusion : the subject warrants additional work with both quantitative and qualitative surveys to better understand the difficulties with preoperative showering.
Asunto(s)
Baños , Cuidadores , Baños/métodos , Humanos , Obesidad , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida QuirúrgicaRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcomes, recurrence rate, and pregnancy likelihood in patients undergoing conservative or radical surgery for deep rectal endometriosis followed up for 7 years. DESIGN: Prospective study in a cohort of patients enrolled in a 2-arm randomized trial from March 2011 to August 2013. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent either segmental resection or nodule excision via shaving or disk excision, depending on randomization that was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was the number of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation, frequent bowel movements, anal incontinence, or bladder dysfunction 24 months after surgery. The secondary end points were values of gastrointestinal and overall quality of life scores. The 7-year recurrence rates (new deep endometriosis nodules infiltrating the rectum) in the excision vs segmental resection arms were 7.4 % vs 0% (p = .24). One of the symptoms included in the definition of the primary outcomes was recorded in 55.6% vs 60.7% of patients (p = .79). However, 51.9% vs 53.6% of patients considered their bowel movements as normal (p = .99). An intention-to-treat comparison of overall quality of life scores did not find a difference between the 2 groups 7 years after surgery. At the end of the 7-year study period, 31 of 37 patients who tried to conceive were successful (83.8%), including 27 pregnancies (57.4%) resulting from natural conception and 20 pregnancies (42.6%) resulting from assisted reproductive technology procedures. The pregnancy rate was 82.4% vs 85% in the 2 arms (p = .99). A 75.7% live birth rate was recorded. At the end of the follow-up, there were 15 women with 1 child (40.5%) and 13 women with 2 children (35.1%). During the 7-year follow-up, the reoperation rates were 37% and 35.7%, respectively, in each arm (p = .84). Among the 27 reoperation procedures during the follow-up period, 11 (40.7%) were for postoperative complications, 7 (25.9%) were necessary before assisted reproductive technology management, 8 (29.6%) were for recurrent abdominal or pelvic pain, and 1 (3.7%) was for midline ventral hernia after pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Our study did not reveal a considerable difference in terms of digestive functional outcomes, recurrence rate, reoperation risk, and pregnancy likelihood when conservative and radical rectal surgeries for deep endometriosis were compared 7 years after surgery. The postoperative pregnancy rate observed in our series was high.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Endometriosis , Laparoscopía , Enfermedades del Recto , Niño , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is among the therapeutic options for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), affecting 90% of patients with obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of NAFLD lesions 1 year after surgery using noninvasive markers. METHODS: From November 2011 to November 2012, 253 patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery in three French University Hospitals were included. Histological data regarding intraoperative liver biopsy were collected at baseline, clinical, and biological data, including FibroTest®, SteatoTest®, and NASHTest®, before and after surgery. RESULTS: Fibrosis' prevalence was 74.2% with a positive predictive value (PPV) for FibroTest® of 78.6% and 43.4% for significant fibrosis (Kleiner ≥ F2) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 56.1%. NAFLD's prevalence was 84% with a PPV for SteatoTest® of 85.9% and 7.7% for NASH with an NPV for NASHTest® of 93.8%. One year after bariatric surgery, mean BMI had significantly decreased from 46.5 to 31.7 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). Fibrosis assessed by the FibroTest® showed that 82.5% of patients were F0 after surgery compared to 90.9% before. Using SteatoTest®, the percent of patient without steatosis (S0) increased from 1.6 to 49.6% after surgery, and rate of severe steatosis (S3) improved from 43.3 to 3.9%. NASHTest® revealed that the percent of patients without NASH increased from 12.8 to 73.6% and rates of NASH improved from 12 to 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Validated noninvasive biomarkers SteatoTest® and NASHTest® suggested NAFLD and steatohepatitis improvement after bariatric surgery and might be useful tools for patient follow-up. Regarding fibrosis, FibroTest® was not accurate in patients with extreme obesity.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Obesidad Mórbida , Biomarcadores , Biopsia , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical simulation has been shown to relieve nausea and vomiting in medically refractory patients. Efficacy of gastric electrical stimulation has been reported mostly in short-term studies, but none has evaluated its efficacy beyond 10 years after implantation. METHODS: Patients implanted at our center for medically refractory severe and chronic nausea and/or vomiting were evaluated before and over 10 years after implantation using symptomatic scale and quality of life (GIQLI) score. Improvement was defined as a reduction of more than 50% in vomiting frequency. KEY RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were implanted from January 1998 to December 2009. Among them, 7 were explanted due to a lack of efficacy and/or side effects, 2 died, and 4 were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 10.5 ± 3.7 years. In intention-to-treat analysis, 27/50 (54%) patients reported an improvement. Beyond 10 years, an improvement in early satiety (3.05 vs 1.76, <0.001), bloating (2.51 vs 1.70, P = .012), nausea (2.46 vs 1.35, P = .001), and vomiting (3.35 vs 1.49 P < .001) scores were observed. Quality of life improved over 10 years (GIQLI score: 69.7 vs. 86.4, P = .005) and body mass index (BMI: 23.4 vs. 26.2 kg/m2 ; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Gastric electrical simulation is effective in the long-term in patients with medically refractory nausea and vomiting, with an efficacy of 54% at 10 years on an intention-to-treat analysis. Other long-term observational studies are warranted to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Gastroparesia/terapia , Náusea/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Estómago , Vómitos/terapia , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/fisiopatología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastroparesia/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vómitos/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: History of gastric surgery is found in 10% of patients with gastroparesis, and vagal lesion is often suspected to be the cause of pylorospasm. Recently, pyloric distensibility measurement using the EndoFLIP® system showed that pylorospasm was present in 30%-50% of gastroparetic patients. Our objective was to assess whether pylorospasm, diagnosed using EndoFLIP® system was observed in three different types of gastric surgeries: antireflux surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, and esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pyloric distensibility and pressure were measured using the EndoFLIP® system in 43 patients from two centers (18 antireflux surgery, 16 sleeve gastrectomy, and nine esophagectomy) with dyspeptic symptoms after gastric surgery, and in 21 healthy volunteers. Altered pyloric distensibility was defined as distensibility below 10 mm2 /mm Hg as previously reported. RESULTS: Compared to healthy volunteers (distensibility: 25.2 ± 2.4 mm2 /mm Hg; pressure: 9.7 ± 4.4 mm Hg), pyloric distensibility was decreased in 61.1% of patients in the antireflux surgery group (14.5 ± 3.4 mm2 /mm Hg; P < .01) and 75.0% of patients in the esophagectomy group (10.8 ± 2.1 mm2 /mm Hg; P < .05), while pyloric pressure was only increased in the antireflux surgery group (18.9 ± 2.2 mm Hg; P < .01). Pyloric distensibility and pressure were similar in healthy volunteers and in sleeve gastrectomy (distensibility: 20.3 ± 3.8 mm2 /mm Hg; pressure: 15.8 ± 1.6 mm Hg) groups, with decreased pyloric distensibility affecting 18.7% of sleeve gastrectomy patients. CONCLUSION: Antireflux surgery and esophagectomy were associated with pylorospasm although pylorospasm was not found in all patients. Sleeve gastrectomy was not associated with altered pyloric distensibility nor altered pyloric pressure.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Gastroparesia/etiología , Píloro/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastroparesia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in functional outcomes and recurrence rate between conservative versus radical rectal surgery in patients with large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum 5 years postoperatively? SUMMARY ANSWER: No evidence was found that long-term outcomes differed when nodule excision was compared to rectal resection for deeply invasive endometriosis involving the bowel. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Functional outcomes of nodule excision and rectal resection for deeply invasive endometriosis involving the bowel are comparable 2 years after surgery. Despite numerous previously reported case series enrolling patients managed for colorectal endometriosis, long-term data remain scarce in the literature. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a two-arm randomized trial, enrolling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring >20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth, and up to 50% of rectal circumference. Among them, 55 women were enrolled at one tertial referral centre in endometriosis, using a randomization list drawn up separately for this centre. Institute review board approval was obtained to continue follow-up to 10 years postoperatively. One patient requested to stop the follow-up 2 years after surgery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients underwent either nodule excision by shaving or disc excision, or segmental resection. Randomization was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, and patients were informed of randomization results. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation (1 stool/>5 consecutive days), frequent bowel movements (≥3 stools/day), anal incontinence, dysuria or bladder atony requiring self-catheterization 24 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were values taken from the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-symptom questionnaire (KESS), the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI), the Wexner scale, the urinary symptom profile (USP) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Fifty-five patients were enrolled. Among the 27 patients in the excision arm, two were converted to segmental resection (7.4%). One patient managed by segmental resection withdrew from the study 2 years postoperatively, presuming that associated pain of other aetiologies may have jeopardized the outcomes. The 5 year-recurrence rate for excision and resection was 3.7% versus 0% (P = 1), respectively. For excision and resection, the primary endpoint was present in 44.4% versus 60.7% of patients (P = 0.29), respectively, while 55.6% versus 53.6% of patients subjectively reported normal bowel movements (P = 1). An intention-to-treat comparison of overall KESS, GIQLI, Wexner, USP and SF36 scores did not reveal significant differences between the two arms 5 years postoperatively. Statistically significant improvement was observed shortly after surgery with no further improvement or impairment recorded 1-5 years postoperatively. During the 5-year follow-up, additional surgical procedures were performed in 25.9% versus 28.6% of patients who had undergone excision or resection (P = 0.80), respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The presumption of a 40% difference concerning postoperative functional outcomes in favour of nodule excision resulted in a lack of power for demonstration of the primary endpoint difference. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Five-year follow-up data do not show statistically significant differences between conservative and radical rectal surgery for long-term functional digestive and urinary outcomes in this specific population of women with large involvement of the rectum. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was received. Patient enrolment and follow-up until 2 years postoperatively was supported by a grant from the clinical research programme for hospitals in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This randomized study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01291576. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31 January 2011. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 7 March 2011.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Endometriosis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Dolor Pélvico/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Recurrencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Totally implanted venous access (TIVA) improves the safety and welfare of patients treated with cancer chemotherapy (CCT). We aimed to evaluate patients' perception of TIVA placement, TIVA use, and information on TIVA, and to assess the association between patients' perception and their attitude regarding a potential TIVA re-implantation. METHODS: We conducted a single center cross-sectional survey in a university hospital in Northern France. Patients included were consecutive urologic or digestive cancer inpatients admitted for a CCT cycle via TIVA between April 9th and May 9th 2014. We analyzed patients' satisfaction, experience, and attitude, especially when requiring potential TIVA re-implantation under local anesthesia (LA), using a standardized questionnaire and medical records. We analyzed risk factors for refusing potential TIVA re-implantation under LA using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were interviewed (no refusals), including 57 with a TIVA device placed under LA in our university hospital. Among them, 52/57 (91%) reported satisfactory TIVA placement, but respectively 21/57 (37%) and 18/57 (32%) complained of painful or uncomfortable TIVA placement; 51/57 (89%) were satisfied with care provided during CCT cycles. Risk factors for refusing potential re-implantation under LA were: TIVA placement considered painful (P=0.012) or uncomfortable (P=0.038) and dissatisfaction with care provided during CCT cycles (P=0.028). DISCUSSION: We show that despite good overall satisfaction regarding TIVA, some aspects were less positive and warrant improvement actions. It suggests that these actions could not only improve patients' experience of TIVA use but could also facilitate continuation of treatment in the long term.
Asunto(s)
Actitud , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Neoplasias Urológicas/psicología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Local , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Análisis de Regresión , Retratamiento/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Predictive factors of functional outcomes after the surgery of rectal endometriosis are not well identified. Our recent randomized trial did not find significant differences between functional outcomes in patients managed by radical or conservative rectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative factors which determine functional outcomes of surgery in patients with rectal endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cohort study on the population of a 2-arm randomised trial, from March 2011 to August 2013. Patients were enrolled in three French university hospitals and had either conservative surgery by shaving or disc excision, or radical rectal surgery by segmental resection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation, frequent bowel movements, anal incontinence, dysuria or bladder atony requiring self-catheterisation 24 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were the values of the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Wexner scale, the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). A logistic regression model based on backward selection was used to screen for baseline factors that could impact the primary endpoint. A generalized estimating equations model for repeated measures was used to assess whether a trend could be observed over the follow-up period as regards gastrointestinal and quality of life scores. RESULTS: 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum were managed by conservative surgery (27 cases) and segmental colorectal resection (33 cases). The primary endpoint was recorded in 26 patients (48.1% for conservative surgery vs. 39.4% for radical surgery, OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.22-2.21). There was a significant improvement in values of all gastrointestinal, quality of life and urinary scores after surgery. Comparing patients with KESS scores < 10 (reference) to those with scores between 10 and 17 (OR = 2.1, 95%CI 0.4-12.2), as well as those with scores >17 (OR = 11.1, 95%CI 2.2-20.5), revealed that the odds to record the primary endpoint are significantly higher in the latter group. Trend analyses suggest that the odds of an elevated KESS score are significantly higher at baseline than at 6 months, but significantly lower after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe preoperative constipation are less likely to achieve normal bowel movements after surgery for rectal endometriosis, using either radical or conservative rectal procedures.
Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Endometriosis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Endometriosis/patología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effectiveness of the use of fibrin sealant (FS) for preventing the development of staple line complications (SLCs) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the best means of preventing SLCs after SG. METHODS: This was a prospective, intention-to-treat, randomized, 2 center study of a group of 586 patients undergoing primary SG (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01613664) between March 2014 and June 2017. The 1:1 randomization was stratified by center, age, sex, gender, and body mass index, giving 293 patients in the FS group and 293 in the control group (without FS). The primary endpoint (composite criteria) was the incidence of SLCs in each of the 2 groups. The secondary criteria were the mortality rate, morbidity rate, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and risk factors for SLC. RESULTS: There were no intergroup differences in demographic variables. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of SLCs was similar in the FS and control groups (1.3% vs 2%, respectively; P = 0.52). All secondary endpoints were similar: complication rate (5.4% vs 5.1%, respectively; P = 0.85), mortality rate (0.3% vs 0%, respectively; P = 0.99), GL rate (0.3% vs 1.3%, respectively; P = 0.18), postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma rate (1% vs 0.7%, respectively; P = 0.68), reoperation rate (1% vs 0.3%, respectively; P = 0.32). Length of stay was 1 day in both groups (P = 0.89), and the readmission rate was similar (5.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; P = 0.32). No risk factors for SLCs were found. CONCLUSION: The incidence of postoperative SLCs did not appear to depend on the presence or absence of FS.
Asunto(s)
Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina/uso terapéutico , Gastrectomía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Grapado Quirúrgico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the postoperative complications related to three surgical procedures used in colorectal endometriosis: rectal shaving, disc excision, and segmental resection. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study using data prospectively recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis (CIRENDO) database. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): A total of 364 consecutive patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectosigmoid, were stratified into three arms according to the technique used. INTERVENTION(S): All patients had a laparoscopic surgical procedure to treat bowel endometriosis: rectal shaving (145 patients), disc excision (80 patients), or segmental colorectal resection (139 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Postoperative complication rate was assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULT(S): Clavien 3b postoperative complications were recorded in 43 patients (11.8%), two thirds of whom were managed by segmental colorectal resection (P<.001). Fourteen cases of rectovaginal fistula (3.8%) were reported: three in the shaving arm (2.1%), three in the disc excision arm (3.7%), and eight in the segmental colorectal resection arm (5.8%) (P=.13). Twenty-four cases (6.6%) of pelvic abscess were recorded in patients free of fistula or leakage. One year after the surgery pregnancy rate (PRs) and delivery rate were comparable between patients with or without severe complications who intended to get pregnant. Three years postoperatively, the PR in infertile patients was 66.7%, with spontaneous conception in 50% of cases. CONCLUSION(S): Our data suggest that using a strategy prioritizing shaving, whenever it is possible, could be related to a reduction in severe complication rates. However, prudence is required before concluding that extensive disease should not be treated by segmental resection because of the risk of complications.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Endometriosis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Enfermedades del Colon/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Colon/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo para Quedar Embarazada , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in functional outcome between conservative versus radical rectal surgery in patients with large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum 2 years postoperatively? SUMMARY ANSWER: No evidence was found that functional outcomes differed when conservative surgery was compared to radical rectal surgery for deeply invasive endometriosis involving the bowel. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Adopting a conservative approach to the surgical management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum, by employing shaving or disc excision, appears to yield improved digestive functional outcomes. However, previous comparative studies were not randomized, introducing a possible bias regarding the presumed superiority of conservative techniques due to the inclusion of patients with more severe deep endometriosis who underwent colorectal resection. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a 2-arm randomized trial, enroling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring more than 20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth and up to 50% of rectal circumference. No women were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients were enroled in three French university hospitals and had either conservative surgery, by shaving or disc excision, or radical rectal surgery, by segmental resection. Randomization was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, and patients were informed of the results of randomization. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation (1 stool/>5 consecutive days), frequent bowel movements (≥3 stools/day), defecation pain, anal incontinence, dysuria or bladder atony requiring self-catheterization 24 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were the values of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Wexner scale, the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 60 patients were enroled. Among the 27 patients in the conservative surgery arm, two were converted to segmental resection (7.4%). In each group, 13 presented with at least one functional problem at 24 months after surgery (48.1 versus 39.4%, OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.22-2.21). The intention-to-treat comparison of the overall scores on KESS, GIQLI, Wexner, USP and SF36 did not reveal significant differences between the two arms. Segmental resection was associated with a significant risk of bowel stenosis. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The inclusion of only large infiltrations of the rectum does not allow the extrapolation of conclusions to small nodules of <20 mm in length. The presumption of a 40% difference favourable to conservative surgery in terms of postoperative functional outcomes resulted in a lack of power to demonstrate a difference for the primary endpoint. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Conservative surgery is feasible in patients managed for large deep rectal endometriosis. The trial does not show a statistically significant superiority of conservative surgery for mid-term functional digestive and urinary outcomes in this specific population of women with large involvement of the rectum. There is a higher risk of rectal stenosis after segmental resection, requiring additional endoscopic or surgical procedures. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the clinical research programme for hospitals (PHRC) in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 01291576. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31 January 2011. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 7 March 2011.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Endometriosis/patología , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is considered as successful if the percentage of Excess Body Mass Index Loss (% EBMIL) remains constant over 50% with long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether early % EBMIL was predictive of success after SG. Methods. This retrospective study included patients who had SG with two years of follow-up. Patients had follow-up appointments at 3 (M3), 6, 12, and 24 months (M24). Data as weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) were collected systematically. We estimated the % EBMIL necessary to establish a correlation between M3 and M24 compared to % EBMIL speeds and calculated a limit value of % EBMIL predictive of success. Results. Data at operative time, M3, and M24 were available for 128 patients. Pearson test showed a correlation between % EBMIL at M3 and that at M24 (r = 0.74; p < 0.0001). % EBMIL speed between surgery and M3 (p = 0.0011) was significant but not between M3 and M24. A linear regression analysis proved that % EBMIL over 20.1% at M3 (p < 0.0001) predicted a final % EBMIL over 50%. Conclusions. % EBMIL at M3 after SG is correlated with % EBMIL in the long term. % EBMIL speed was significant in the first 3 months. % EBMIL over 20.1% at M3 leads to the success of SG.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the postoperative outcomes of patients with rectal endometriosis managed by disc excision using transanal staplers. DESIGN: Prospective study using data recorded in the CIRENDO database (NCT02294825). SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): A total of 111 consecutive patients managed between June 2009 and June 2016. INTERVENTION(S): We performed rectal disc excision using two different transanal staplers: [1] the Contour Transtar stapler (the Rouen technique); and [2] the end to end anastomosis circular transanal stapler. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Pre- and postoperative digestive function was assessed using standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires: the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Questionnaire. RESULT(S): The two staplers were used in 42 (37.8%) and 69 patients (62.2%), respectively. The largest diameter of specimens achieved was significantly higher using the Rouen technique (mean ± SD, 59 ± 11 mm vs. 36 ± 7 mm), which was used to remove nodules located lower in the rectum (5.5 ± 1.3 cm vs. 9.7 ± 2.5 cm) infiltrating more frequently the adjacent posterior vaginal wall (83.3% vs. 49.3%). Associated nodules involving sigmoid colon were managed by distinct procedures, either disc excision (2.7%) or segmental resection of sigmoid colon (9.9%). Postoperative values for the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index increased 1 and 3 years after the surgery, but improvement in constipation was not significant. The probability of pregnancy at 1 year after the arrest of medical treatment was 73.3% (95% confidence interval 54.9%-88.9%), with a majority of spontaneous conceptions. CONCLUSION(S): Disc excision using transanal staplers is a valuable alternative to colorectal resection in selected patients presenting with rectal endometriosis, allowing for good preservation of rectal function.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/instrumentación , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas , Grapado Quirúrgico/instrumentación , Adulto , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/fisiopatología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Fertilidad , Francia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo , Grapado Quirúrgico/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo para Quedar Embarazada , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Digestive surgery training is notoriously difficult and medical students choose this path less and less often leading to a veritable demographic crisis for this specialty in France. The aim of this study was to evaluate the working conditions to measure the prevalence of burnout syndrome (BOS) and to identify potential risk factors to implement preventive measures and appropriate support. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. An anonymous questionnaire was sent by e-mail to 500 French digestive surgeons in training (residents and fellows). RESULTS: The response rate was 65.6%. The mean working week was 75.7 hours (±12) and the mean number of night shifts was 5.3 (±1.6)/month. Sixty-seven percent of respondents had trouble sleeping and 12% reported suicidal thoughts. High-emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment low scores were observed respectively in 24.7%, 44.6%, and 47%, corresponding to a high score of BOS in 52%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a high rate of BOS in French digestive surgeons in training and a worrying rate of suicide ideation.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Becas , Internado y Residencia , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Despersonalización , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/educación , Fatiga/etiología , Fatiga/psicología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/etiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología , Ideación Suicida , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Two surgical approaches usually are used in the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum: the radical approach that mainly is based on colorectal resection and the conservative or symptom-guided approach that prioritizes conservation of the rectum. There are no data available that compare long-term functional digestive outcomes of 1 approach to the other. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term digestive outcomes in women who were treated by either rectal shaving or colorectal resection for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study was performed. All women who were treated with surgery for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum by either shaving or colorectal resection at the University Hospital of Rouen from January 2005 to January 2010 were enrolled. Follow-up evaluation was carried out for a minimum of 5 years. Postoperative evaluation of digestive symptoms was performed by 4 standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires: the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom score for constipation, the Wexner score for anal continence, and the Bristol Stool Score. Symptoms that were related to endometriosis, fertility, and disease recurrence were obtained from a specific questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 77 women were included. Three women were lost to follow up (3.9%), and 3 were treated by disc excision (3.9%). The mean follow-up time was 80±19 months. Forty-six women underwent conservative rectal shaving, and 25 women underwent colorectal resection. Patient characteristics and the severity of the disease were comparable in both groups. Patients who were treated by rectal shaving had significantly better Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index values, lower Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom scores for postoperative constipation, and better anal continence. No statistically significant differences were revealed for postoperative pelvic pain. Rectal recurrence occurred in 8.7% of patients who were treated by conservative surgery: 4.3% underwent secondary colorectal resection and 4.3% were treated secondarily by rectal shaving. Consequently, avoiding a recurrence for merely 1 patient would have required 11 patients to undergo colorectal resection instead of shaving. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that, in patients who are treated for rectal endometriosis, colorectal resection does not improve long-term postoperative functional outcomes when compared with rectal shaving.