RESUMEN

Considerable variation in practice exists in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is a devastating complication for patients and surgeons. The consensus principle has been increasingly embraced by the orthopaedic community to help guide practice, especially where high-level evidence remains unavailable. The third United Kingdom Periprosthetic Joint Infection (UK PJI) Meeting was held in Glasgow on April 1, 2022, with more than 180 delegates in attendance, representing orthopaedics, microbiology, infectious diseases, plastic surgery, anesthetics, and allied health professions, including pharmacy and arthroplasty nurses. The meeting comprised a combined session for all delegates, and separate breakout sessions for arthroplasty and fracture-related infection. Consensus questions for each session were prepared in advance by the UK PJI working group, based upon topics that were proposed at previous UK PJI Meetings, and delegates participated in an anonymized electronic voting process. We present the findings of the combined and arthroplasty sessions of the meeting in this article, and each consensus topic is discussed in relation to the contemporary literature.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: To compare outcomes of revision to a long uncemented stem with cement-in-cement revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for a Vancouver B2 PPF in a cemented stem from 2008 to 2018 were identified using our prospectively collated database. Results: We identified 43 uncemented and 29 cement-in-cement revisions. Cement-in-cement revision had a shorter operative time, reduction in certain complications, no increased rate of non-union, lower degree of stem subsidence and no difference in re-revision rate. Conclusion: With appropriate patient selection, both cement-in-cement and long uncemented stem revision represent appropriate treatment options for Vancouver B2 fractures.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The optimum choice of bearing surfaces in total hip replacement (THR) in the younger and active patient remains controversial. The aim of this study was to report the 10 year clinical outcomes, and a median of 15 year implant survival and incidence of complications in a series of Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THRs utilising an uncemented shell and cemented stem. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2007, 175 consecutive patients (195 hips) underwent primary THR. The acetabular components was Trident Peripheral Self Locking (Stryker Orthopaedics) with a third-generation ceramic head and liner (Alumina ceramic, Stryker Orthopaedics). The stem utilised was an Exeter V-40 (Stryker Orthopaedics). Data were collated on demographics, surgical factors, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes and revision. RESULTS: 23 patients (27 THRs) died during the follow-up period at a median of 7.8 (3.8 to 9.0) years post-operatively due to causes unrelated to the THR. Median age at time of surgery was 55 (interquartile range 48-60) years. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 15.2 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision was 97.2%. Increasing patient age at time of surgery was associated with a higher OHS at 10 years (p = 0.022). 32 mm head diameter had an improved OHS at 3 months (p = 0.014) and 10 years (p = 0.030). Posterior surgical approach had a statistically significant better OHS at 3 months (p = 0.015) and 1 year (p < 0.001), but the effect was not significant at 10 years (p = 0.440). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study support excellent long-term outcomes and survivorship of Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in a hybrid THR in a younger population. Surgical factors leading to a more favourable outcome were the use of a 32 mm femoral head and a posterior approach. Increasing age at surgery demonstrated the most sustained improvement in 10 year clinical outcomes.

Asunto(s)