RESUMEN

Objetivo:analizar la evidencia de estudios previos sobre las diferentes alternativas de tratamientos con el uso de agentes físicos y técnicas manuales utilizados en la fisioterapia para la ingurgitación mamaria a nivel internacional. Material y método:estudio de revisión sistemática con meta-análisis según el pro-tocolo prisma. Búsqueda en las bases de datos de Scopus y Medline a través de PubMed, publicados desde el 01 de enero de 2015 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2021. La estrategia de búsqueda empleó los siguien-tes términos: breastengorgement, treatment, breastfeeding, six-pointengorgementscale, physiotherapy, breastcancer, physicaltherapy. Los 5 estudios elegidos para esta revisión sistemática fueron valorados con la Escala pedro para conocer la calidad metodológica. Resultados:diferencias medias estandarizadas oscilaron entre 0,5959 y 2,7373, la mayoría de las estimaciones positivas. El resultado promedio difirió significativamente de cero (z = 3,5686, p = 0,0004). Según prueba Q, los resultados reales parecen ser heterogéneos (Q (5) = 23,2212, p = 0,0003, tau² = 0,4759, I² = 83,6163%). Intervalo de predicción del 95 % para los resultados reales viene dado por -0,3733 a 2,5931. Un intervalo de predicción del 95 % para los resultados reales viene dado por -3,6762 a 11,5933. Conclusiones: las técnicas estudiadas disminuyen el dolor y la congestión mamaria, sin embargo, se ha visto que la combinación entre ellas puede favorecer aún más la mejora de los mismos. Al aplicarse en las mujeres con ingurgitación generaron beneficios a corto y largo plazo para disminuir el dolor y la ingurgitación mamaria

Objective: To analyze the evidence of previous studies on the different treatment alternatives with the use of physical agents and manual techniques used in physiotherapy for breast engorgement at an international level. Method: Systematic review study with meta-analysis according to the prisma pro-tocol. Search in Scopus and Medline databases through PubMed, published from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021. The search strategy employed the following terms: breast engorgement, treatment, breastfeeding, six-point engorgement scale, physiotherapy, breast cancer, Physical therapy. The 5 stu-dies chosen for this systematic review were assessed with the PEDro Scale for methodological quality. Results: Standardized mean differences ranged from 0.5959 to 2.7373, most of the positive estimates. The average result differed significantly from zero (z = 3.5686; p = 0.0004). According to Q test, the actual results appear to be heterogeneous (Q(5) = 23.2212; p = 0.0003; tau² = 0.4759; I² = 83.6163%). The 95% prediction interval for the actual results is given by −0.3733 to 2.5931. A 95% prediction interval for the actual results is given by −3.6762 to 11.5933. Conclusions: The techniques studied decrease breast pain and engorgement; however, it has been seen that the combination between them can further favor their improvement. When applied in women with engorgement, they generated short and long term benefits in reducing pain and breast engorgement

Objetivo: analisar as evidências de estudos anteriores sobre as diferentes alternativas de tratamento com uso de agentes físicos e técnicas manuais utilizadas na fisioterapia para ingurgitamento mamá-rio internacionalmente. Material e método: estudo de revisão sistemática com meta-análise segundo protocolo prisma. Pesquisa nas bases de dados Scopus e Medline por meio do PubMed, publicadas de 1º de janeiro de 2015 a 31 de dezembro de 2021. A estratégia de busca utilizou os seguintes termos: breastingorgement, treatment, breastfeeding, six-pointengorgementscale, physiotherapy, breastcancer, physi-caltherapy. Os 5 estudos escolhidos para esta revisão sistemática foram avaliados com a Escala pedro para determinar a qualidade metodológica. Resultados: as diferenças médias padronizadas variaram de 0,5959 a 2,7373, com a maioria das estimativas positivas. O resultado médio diferiu significativamente de zero (z = 3,5686, p = 0,0004). Segundo o teste Q, os resultados reais parecem ser heterogêneos (Q (5) = 23,2212, p = 0,0003, tau² = 0,4759, I² = 83,6163%). O intervalo de previsão de 95% para resultados reais é dado por -0,3733 a 2,5931. Um intervalo de previsão de 95% para os resultados reais é dado por -3,6762 a 11,5933. Conclusões: as técnicas estudadas reduzem a dor e a congestão mamária, porém, constatou-se que a combinação entre elas pode melhorar ainda mais a sua melhora. Quando aplicados em mulheres 2024com ingurgitamento, geraram benefícios de curto e longo prazo para reduzir a dor e o ingurgitamento mamário.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is considered to be a cyclic chronic pelvic pain, with its onset in menstrual periods, often accompanied by the presence of myofascial trigger points (MTP). Most MTPs in subjects with chronic pelvic pain are in the inferior part of the abdomen, in the rectus abdominis (RA) area. Central sensitization is closely related to chronic pain processes. Previous studies in women with chronic pelvic pain reported central sensitization signs in their subjects, such as lower pain pressure threshold (PPT). Several authors agree that PPT in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, seems to be a reliable reference for signs of central sensitization. Amongst the factors that seem to accompany central sensitization, the presence of anxiety needs to be considered. The aim of the present study was to analyze the existence of hyperalgesic MTPs in RA, central sensitization signs and anxiety in women with PD, in comparison with a control group (CG). Methods: This study was designed following an observational, cross-sectional, case-control model. A total sample of 80 subjects was recruited trough social webs and advertising (PD n = 39) (CG n = 41). PPT in RA and AT was assessed bilaterally through algometry, and anxiety was evaluated through the State−Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results: Statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were shown for NRS average and maximum increase, as well as lower bilaterally RA and TA PPT in favor of PD group compared to CG. State or trait STAI did not show any statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between groups. Conclusions: In this study, women with PD reported symptoms of myofascial pain syndrome and central sensitization, when compared with healthy controls, without any sign of anxiety acting as a confounder for pain sensitivity.