Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Health Technol Assess ; 16(48): v-xv, 1-116, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23211271

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the REMiniscence groups for people with dementia and their family CAREgivers (REMCARE) study was to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of joint reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family caregivers as compared with usual care. DESIGN: A multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms - an intervention group and a usual-care control group - was carried out. A restricted dynamic method of randomisation was used with an overall allocation ratio of 1 : 1, restricted to ensure intervention groups of a viable size. Assessments, blind to treatment allocation, were carried out at baseline, 3 months and 10 months (primary end point). SETTING: Most participants were recruited through NHS Memory Clinics and Community Mental Health Teams for older people. Assessments were usually carried out in the person's home, and treatment groups were held in a variety of community settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 488 individuals (mean age 77.5 years) with mild to moderate dementia (meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition criteria), who were initially living in the community, and who had a relative or other caregiver maintaining regular contact, who could act as an informant and was willing and able to participate in the intervention, were recruited to the study. Most carers were spouses (71%). A total of 350 dyads completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention consisted of joint reminiscence groups held weekly for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by monthly maintenance sessions for a further 7 months. The sessions followed a treatment manual, and were led by two trained facilitators in each centre, supported by a number of volunteers. Up to 12 dyads were invited to attend each group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were self-reported quality of life for the person with dementia and psychological distress for the carer [General Health Questionnaire-28 item version (GHQ-28)]. Secondary outcome measures included autobiographical memory and activities of daily living for the person with dementia, carer stress for the carer and mood, relationship quality and service use and costs for both parties. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis identified no differences in outcome between the intervention and control conditions on primary or secondary outcomes [self-reported quality of life in Alzheimer's disease: mean difference 0.07, standard error (SE) 0.65; F = 0.48; p = 0.53]. Carers of people with dementia allocated to the reminiscence intervention reported a significant increase in anxiety on a subscale of the GHQ-28 at the 10-month end point (mean difference 1.25, SE 0.5; F = 8.28; p = 0.04). Compliance analyses suggested some benefits for people with dementia who attended more reminiscence sessions; however, carers attending more groups showed increased caregiving stress. Use of health- and social-care services was modest, with no significant difference in service use between conditions. Owing to negligible difference in quality-adjusted life-year gains (derived from European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) between the conditions the planned full economic analysis was curtailed. CONCLUSIONS: This trial does not provide support for the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of joint reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their carers. Although there may be some beneficial effects for people with dementia who attend sessions as planned, this must be viewed in the context of raised anxiety and stress in their carers. The reasons for these discrepant outcomes need to be explored further, and may necessitate reappraisal of the movement towards joint interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42430123. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 16, No. 48. See the HTA programme website for further project information.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Demencia/enfermería , Recuerdo Mental , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Psicoterapia de Grupo/economía , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución por Sexo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
2.
J Food Sci ; 73(4): R48-65, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18460139

RESUMEN

Vegetables are an important part of the human diet and a major source of biologically active substances such as vitamins, dietary fiber, antioxidants, and cholesterol-lowering compounds. Despite a large amount of information on this topic, the nutritional quality of vegetables has not been defined. Historically, the value of many plant nutrients and health-promoting compounds was discovered by trial and error. By the turn of the century, the application of chromatography, mass spectrometry, infrared spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance allowed quantitative and qualitative measurements of a large number of plant metabolites. Approximately 50000 metabolites have been elucidated in plants, and it is predicted that the final number will exceed 200000. Most of them have unknown function. Metabolites such as carbohydrates, organic and amino acids, vitamins, hormones, flavonoids, phenolics, and glucosinolates are essential for plant growth, development, stress adaptation, and defense. Besides the importance for the plant itself, such metabolites determine the nutritional quality of food, color, taste, smell, antioxidative, anticarcinogenic, antihypertension, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, immunostimulating, and cholesterol-lowering properties. This review is focused on major plant metabolites that characterize the nutritional quality of vegetables, and methods of their analysis.


Asunto(s)
Valor Nutritivo , Verduras/química , Verduras/metabolismo , Alcaloides/análisis , Aminoácidos/análisis , Carbohidratos/análisis , Ácidos Carboxílicos/análisis , Cromatografía/métodos , Electroforesis/métodos , Ácidos Grasos/análisis , Flavonoides/análisis , Promoción de la Salud , Fenoles/análisis , Polifenoles , Análisis Espectral/métodos , Terpenos/análisis , Complejo Vitamínico B/análisis
3.
Diabet Med ; 20(1): 73-5, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12519324

RESUMEN

AIMS: Diabetic pregnancies have an increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and preterm delivery. Antenatal corticosteroids can prevent RDS but induce acute severe hyperglycaemia. We have developed a protocol which prevents hyperglycaemia and can be used easily by ward staff. METHODS: Intramuscular dexamethasone is given in two doses 12 h apart. Subcutaneous insulin and diet are continued but from the first dexamethasone dose until 12 h after the second, supplementary intravenous insulin is infused according to hourly blood glucose measurements. The protocol incorporates four graded sliding scales. The initial scale is selected according to the patient's current subcutaneous insulin dose and advanced if the blood glucose is > or = 10.1 mmol/l for 2 consecutive hours. RESULTS: In a 10-month period eight (three gestational, five pre-gestational) women received antenatal corticosteroids from a total of 37 diabetic pregnancies. The median amount of supplementary intravenous insulin required was 74 U (range 32-88 U); the median glucose values achieved were 5.8-8.9 mmol/l. Seventy-five percent of glucose measurements were within an acceptable range of 4-10 mmol/l. Only one baby developed RDS. DISCUSSION: Large amounts of supplementary intravenous insulin are needed to achieve even moderate glycaemic control. This protocol enables routine ward staff to manage this successfully.


Asunto(s)
Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Embarazo en Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/prevención & control , Protocolos Clínicos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA