RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) provide valuable information for assessing and differentiating lesions in the body. However, contrast enhancement evaluation on conventional MRI is qualitative because the signal intensity uses an arbitrary scale. An approach that allows more quantitative assessment of tissue enhancement that can be integrated into clinical use is desirable. This study aimed to provide a method that can estimate GBCA concentration in a clinically applicable scan-time. METHODS: Gadolinium-based contrast agent concentrations were quantified in phantoms containing water and nine different concentrations of Gadoteridol (Gd-HP-DO3A), ranging from 0.02 to 1.00 mmol/L, using quantitative synthetic MRI. Simple linear regression analysis between the estimated GBCA concentration and the reference values were performed to assess the accuracy. We performed region of interest analysis on each phantom, and recorded the mean and standard deviation. We evaluated the precision of the GBCA map by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) for each concentration. The GBCA concentration quantification method was applied for 10 patients with metastatic brain tumors to demonstrate the feasibility of this method. RESULTS: For the phantom study, estimated GBCA concentrations were in a strong linear relationship (R2 = 0.998) with reference values, with a slope and intercept on simple linear regression analysis of 0.98 and 0.02, respectively. On precision assessment, the CV was <5%, with the exception of concentrations under 0.07 mmol/L. In the range of 0.07-0.99 mmol/L, the mean CV was 1.5 ± 1.2%. For application to brain metastases, the maximum estimated GBCA concentration in the metastases was 0.73 mmol/L, which was under the upper limit evaluated in the phantom study (i.e. -0.99 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: The concentration of Gd-HP-DO3A in the range of 0.07-0.99 mmol/L can be measured in a clinically applicable scan time using quantitative synthetic MRI, even though this study's results are only preliminary due to several limitations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Gadolinio , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Fantasmas de ImagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the linearity, bias, intrascanner repeatability, and interscanner reproducibility of quantitative values derived from a multidynamic multiecho (MDME) sequence for rapid simultaneous relaxometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NIST/ISMRM (National Institute of Standards and Technology/International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine) phantom, containing spheres with standardized T1 and T2 relaxation times and proton density (PD), and 10 healthy volunteers, were scanned 10 times on different days and 2 times during the same session, using the MDME sequence, on three 3 T scanners from different vendors. For healthy volunteers, brain volumetry and myelin estimation were performed based on the measured T1, T2, and PD. The measured phantom values were compared with reference values; volunteer values were compared with their averages across 3 scanners. RESULTS: The linearity of both phantom and volunteer measurements in T1, T2, and PD values was very strong (R = 0.973-1.000, 0.979-1.000, and 0.982-0.999, respectively) The highest intrascanner coefficients of variation (CVs) for T1, T2, and PD were 2.07%, 7.60%, and 12.86% for phantom data, and 1.33%, 0.89%, and 0.77% for volunteer data, respectively. The highest interscanner CVs of T1, T2, and PD were 10.86%, 15.27%, and 9.95% for phantom data, and 3.15%, 5.76%, and 3.21% for volunteer data, respectively. Variation of T1 and T2 tended to be larger at higher values outside the range of those typically observed in brain tissue. The highest intrascanner and interscanner CVs for brain tissue volumetry were 2.50% and 5.74%, respectively, for cerebrospinal fluid. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative values derived from the MDME sequence are overall robust for brain relaxometry and volumetry on 3 T scanners from different vendors. Caution is warranted when applying MDME sequence on anatomies with relaxometry values outside the range of those typically observed in brain tissue.