RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Refractory pain is a major clinical problem in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). New, effective therapies to reduce pain are urgently needed. Intravenous lidocaine is used in clinical practice in patients with PDAC and CP, but its efficacy has not been studied prospectively. METHODS: Multicentre prospective non-randomized pilot study including patients with moderate or severe pain (NRS ≥ 4) associated with PDAC or CP in 5 Dutch centers. An intravenous lidocaine bolus of 1.5mg/kg, was followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/hour. The dose was raised every 15 minutes until treatment response (up to a maximum 2mg/kg/hour) and consecutively administered for two hours. Primary outcome was the mean difference in pain severity, pre-infusion and the first day after (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] scale 1-10). A BPI decrease ≥ 1.3 points was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Overall, 30 patients were included, 19 with PDAC (63%) and 11 with CP (37%). The mean difference in BPI at day one was 1.1 (SD±1.3) points for patients with PDAC and 0.5 (SD±1.7) for CP patients. A clinically relevant decrease in BPI on day one was reported in 9/29 patients (31%), this response lasted up to one month. No serious complications were reported, and only three minor complications (vertigo, nausea, tingling of mouth). Treatment with lidocaine did not impact quality of life. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine in patients with painful PDAC and CP did not show an overall clinically relevant reduction of pain. However, this pilot study shows that the treatment is feasible in this patient group, and had a positive effect in a third of patients which lasted up to a month with only minor side effects. To prove or exclude the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine, the study should be performed in a study with a greater sample size and less heterogeneous patient group.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lower-limb amputations are rare but debilitating events in the lives of affected persons. Treatment of persons with amputation inherently involves many different health care professions at different stages leading to and after an amputation. There are prevailing clinical questions within the work field related to different facets of care including peri/postoperative aspects, prosthetic components, rehabilitation treatment, and health care processes. OBJECTIVES: To provide an up-to-date multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for health care professionals involved in the treatment of persons with lower-limb amputation in the Netherlands. METHODS: Identification of key questions in a focus group, systematic review of the evidence (up to March 2019, using Embase and MEDLINE databases), and weighing considerations, culminating in clinical recommendations. RESULTS: Twelve key questions were formulated. Recommendations of two key questions were upheld in line with the previous 2012 guideline. Ten systematic literature searches were performed, leading to the inclusion of 59 studies. CONCLUSION: A summary of evidence-based conclusions, considerations, and recommendations of the 2020 guideline is presented.