RESUMEN
We sought to compare the clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with lung cancer and confirmed COVID-19 infection to those with negative RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 results. We included patients with confirmed lung cancer and suspected COVID-19 who presented to the emergency department. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or mechanical ventilation. We analyzed the characteristics according to RT-PCR results and primary outcome. We constructed a logistic regression for each RT-PCR result group to find potential predictors of the primary outcome. Among 110 individuals with confirmed lung cancer (65±9 years, 51% male), 38 patients had positive RT-PCR and 72 patients had negative RT-PCR. There was no difference between groups for any clinical characteristic or comorbidities though individuals with confirmed COVID-19 had higher functionality in the ECOG scale. Leucocytes and lymphocytes were lower in individuals with positive tests. The primary outcome occurred in 58 (53%) individuals, 37 (34%) were admitted to the ICU, and 29 (26%) required mechanical ventilation. Although mortality was similar between the two groups, individuals with confirmed COVID-19 were significantly more likely to be admitted to the ICU or receive mechanical ventilation. Only lower lymphocytes and higher CRP were significantly associated with higher mortality. The clinical presentation of COVID-19 in lung cancer is not sufficient to identify higher or lower probability groups among symptomatic individuals, the overall mortality is high irrespective of RT-PCR results, and lymphopenia on admission was associated with the diagnosis and prognosis for COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
We sought to compare the clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with lung cancer and confirmed COVID-19 infection to those with negative RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 results. We included patients with confirmed lung cancer and suspected COVID-19 who presented to the emergency department. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or mechanical ventilation. We analyzed the characteristics according to RT-PCR results and primary outcome. We constructed a logistic regression for each RT-PCR result group to find potential predictors of the primary outcome. Among 110 individuals with confirmed lung cancer (65±9 years, 51% male), 38 patients had positive RT-PCR and 72 patients had negative RT-PCR. There was no difference between groups for any clinical characteristic or comorbidities though individuals with confirmed COVID-19 had higher functionality in the ECOG scale. Leucocytes and lymphocytes were lower in individuals with positive tests. The primary outcome occurred in 58 (53%) individuals, 37 (34%) were admitted to the ICU, and 29 (26%) required mechanical ventilation. Although mortality was similar between the two groups, individuals with confirmed COVID-19 were significantly more likely to be admitted to the ICU or receive mechanical ventilation. Only lower lymphocytes and higher CRP were significantly associated with higher mortality. The clinical presentation of COVID-19 in lung cancer is not sufficient to identify higher or lower probability groups among symptomatic individuals, the overall mortality is high irrespective of RT-PCR results, and lymphopenia on admission was associated with the diagnosis and prognosis for COVID-19.
RESUMEN
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has practical and theoretical advantages over adjuvant chemotherapy strategy in breast cancer (BC) management. Moreover, metronomic delivery has a more favorable toxicity profile. The present study examined the feasibility of neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in two cohorts [HER2+ (TraQme) and HER2− (TAME)] of locally advanced BC. Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled (TraQme, n=9; TAME, n=11). Both cohorts received weekly paclitaxel at 100 mg/m2 during 8 weeks followed by weekly doxorubicin at 24 mg/m2 for 9 weeks in combination with oral cyclophosphamide at 100 mg/day (fixed dose). The HER2+ cohort received weekly trastuzumab. The study was interrupted because of safety issues. Thirty-six percent of patients in the TAME cohort and all patients from the TraQme cohort had stage III BC. Of note, 33% from the TraQme cohort and 66% from the TAME cohort displayed hormone receptor positivity in tumor tissue. The pathological complete response rates were 55% and 18% among patients enrolled in the TraQme and TAME cohorts, respectively. Patients in the TraQme cohort had more advanced BC stages at diagnosis, higher-grade pathological classification, and more tumors lacking hormone receptor expression, compared to the TAME cohort. The toxicity profile was also different. Two patients in the TraQme cohort developed pneumonitis, and in the TAME cohort we observed more hematological toxicity and hand-foot syndrome. The neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy regimen evaluated in this trial was highly effective in achieving a tumor response, especially in the HER2+ cohort. Pneumonitis was a serious, unexpected adverse event observed in this group. Further larger and randomized trials are warranted to evaluate the association between metronomic chemotherapy and trastuzumab treatment.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Descontaminación/métodos , Geobacillus stearothermophilus/efectos de los fármacos , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/administración & dosificación , Control de Infecciones/métodosRESUMEN
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has practical and theoretical advantages over adjuvant chemotherapy strategy in breast cancer (BC) management. Moreover, metronomic delivery has a more favorable toxicity profile. The present study examined the feasibility of neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in two cohorts [HER2+ (TraQme) and HER2- (TAME)] of locally advanced BC. Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled (TraQme, n=9; TAME, n=11). Both cohorts received weekly paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2) during 8 weeks followed by weekly doxorubicin at 24 mg/m(2) for 9 weeks in combination with oral cyclophosphamide at 100 mg/day (fixed dose). The HER2+ cohort received weekly trastuzumab. The study was interrupted because of safety issues. Thirty-six percent of patients in the TAME cohort and all patients from the TraQme cohort had stage III BC. Of note, 33% from the TraQme cohort and 66% from the TAME cohort displayed hormone receptor positivity in tumor tissue. The pathological complete response rates were 55% and 18% among patients enrolled in the TraQme and TAME cohorts, respectively. Patients in the TraQme cohort had more advanced BC stages at diagnosis, higher-grade pathological classification, and more tumors lacking hormone receptor expression, compared to the TAME cohort. The toxicity profile was also different. Two patients in the TraQme cohort developed pneumonitis, and in the TAME cohort we observed more hematological toxicity and hand-foot syndrome. The neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy regimen evaluated in this trial was highly effective in achieving a tumor response, especially in the HER2+ cohort. Pneumonitis was a serious, unexpected adverse event observed in this group. Further larger and randomized trials are warranted to evaluate the association between metronomic chemotherapy and trastuzumab treatment.
Asunto(s)
Administración Metronómica , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Receptor ErbB-2 , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/química , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Síndrome Mano-Pie/etiología , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Clasificación del Tumor , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neumonía/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , TrastuzumabRESUMEN
Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is an emergent pathogen in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The aim of this study was to describe HAIs due to KPC-Kp, as well as identify mortality risk factors in cancer patients. In patients diagnosed with HAIs due to KPC-Kp between January 2009 and July 2013, we evaluated only the first infection episode of each patient, analyzing mortality separately for patients treated for ≥48 h with at least one antimicrobial agent proven to display in vitro activity against KPC-Kp. We evaluated variables related to the malignancy, the severity and characteristics of the HAI, and the antimicrobial therapy. We identified 83 HAIs due to KPC-Kp. The 30-day mortality was 57.8 % for all infections and 72.7 % for bacteremic infections. Of the 83 patients, 60 patients received ≥48 h of appropriate treatment and 44 (53 %) developed bacteremia. Ten patients (12 %) were neutropenic at HAI diagnosis and 33 (39.8 %) had infection at the tumor site. The most common HAI was urinary tract infection, seen in 26 patients (31.3 %), followed by primary bloodstream infection, seen in 24 patients (28.9 %). Forty-four patients (73.3 %) received combination antimicrobial therapy, most often including polymyxin (68.3 %). Risk factors for 30-day mortality are high sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, need for intensive care stay at diagnosis of infection, and acute kidney injury; the removal of invasive devices related to infection and treatment with effective antibiotics for KPC-Kp are protective factors. In cancer patients, high mortality is associated with HAI due to KPC-Kp and mortality risk factors are more often related to acute infection than to the underlying disease.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Klebsiella/complicaciones , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/microbiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations have been associated with lung metastases at diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but the impact of this mutation on subsequent development of lung metastasis is unknown. We investigated KRAS mutation as a predictor of lung metastasis development. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from patients with mCRC whose tumour was tested for KRAS mutation from 2008 to 2010. The relationships of KRAS mutational status with time-to-lung metastasis (TTLM) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 494 patients identified, 202 (41%) had tumours with KRAS mutation. KRAS mutations were associated with a shorter TTLM (median 15.2 vs 22.4 months; hazard ratio=1.40; P=0.002) and a two-fold greater odds of developing lung metastases during the disease course in patients with liver-limited mCRC at diagnosis (72 vs 56%, P=0.007). Overall survival did not differ by KRAS status. CONCLUSIONS: Lung metastasis was more likely to develop during the disease course in patients whose tumour had a KRAS mutation than in those whose tumour did not have a KRAS mutation. This finding may have an impact on decision making for surgical resection of metastatic disease.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Proteínas ras/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histological type of invasive breast carcinoma, preceded only by infiltrating ductal carcinoma, which has clinical, biological and molecular distinctions. These distinctions imply a different metastatic behavior between the histology of these 2 types of breast cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 51-year-old woman with breast cancer with ILC histology, diagnosed at an early stage. In the course of her disease, recurrences in the gastric mucosa and endobronchial area occurred. The treatment she received is described herein. CONCLUSION: This is a case of ILC with unusual metastases. The absence of E-cadherin is related to the carcinogenesis of ILC and probably to these patterns of metastasis as well.
RESUMEN
Significant achievements in the systemic treatment of both advanced breast cancer and advanced colorectal cancer over the past 10 years have led to a growing number of drugs, combinations, and sequences to be tested. The choice of surrogate and true end points has become a critical issue and one that is currently the subject of much debate. Many recent randomized trials in solid tumor oncology have used progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary end point. PFS is an attractive end point because it is available earlier than overall survival (OS) and is not influenced by second-line treatments. PFS is now undergoing validation as a surrogate end point in various disease settings. The question of whether PFS can be considered an acceptable surrogate end point depends not only on formal validation studies but also on a standardized definition and unbiased ascertainment of disease progression in clinical trials. In advanced breast cancer, formal validation of PFS as a surrogate for OS has so far been unsuccessful. In advanced colorectal cancer, in contrast, current evidence indicates that PFS is a valid surrogate for OS after first-line treatment with chemotherapy. The other question is whether PFS sufficiently reflects clinical benefit to be considered a true end point in and of itself.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer is based on i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Numerous attempts have been made to increase the therapeutic benefit of 5-FU through schedule modification and biomodulation, but only modest improvements have been achieved. Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that was developed in response to the clinical need for new therapeutic options offering improved efficacy, tolerability, and convenience for patients. Capecitabine was rationally designed to mimic continuous infusion 5-FU. It is rapidly and almost completely absorbed through the gastrointestinal wall and is converted to 5-FU via a three-step enzymatic cascade. 5-FU is generated preferentially in tumor by exploiting the higher activity of thymidine phosphorylase in tumor tissue compared with normal tissue. Results of a randomized, phase II trial led to the selection of a regimen of capecitabine for further clinical development (1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest period). Subsequently, two large, randomized, phase III trials were conducted to compare capecitabine with i.v. bolus 5-FU/leucovorin ([LV]; Mayo Clinic regimen) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A prospective, integrated analysis of data from the studies showed that capecitabine offers superior activity and an improved safety profile compared with 5-FU/LV. This article summarizes these developments in the treatment of colorectal cancer and assesses the feasibility of replacing i.v. 5-FU-based therapy with oral capecitabine. In addition, retrospective analyses assessing the impact of the dose modification scheme on the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine are presented, and dose recommendations in special populations are reviewed.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Capecitabina , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Desoxicitidina/farmacocinética , Esquema de Medicación , Fluorouracilo/farmacocinética , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Researchers, primarily in Japan, Europe, and the United States, have evaluated several new fluorinated pyrimidines in recent years. Most of these drugs are orally active prodrugs of fluorouracil (5-FU), and some also contain modulators of its pharmacological properties. S-1 is a rationally developed combination of tegafur, a prodrug of 5-FU; CDHP, an inhibitor of 5-FU catabolism; and potassium oxonate, an inhibitor of 5-FU-induced diarrhea. S-1 underwent phase I and II trials in Japan, where it is now approved for use in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two phase I studies conducted recently in Europe and the United States identified diarrhea as the dose-limiting toxicity of S-1. BOF-A2, which contains a 5-FU prodrug and CNDP, an inhibitor of 5-FU catabolism, demonstrated clinical activity in preliminary studies in Japan. This article summarizes the preclinical and clinical development of S-1 and BOF-A2.