RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a new treatment option (t-TEER). Data on optimal antithrombotic therapy after t-TEER in patients with an indication for anticoagulation are scarce and evidence-based guideline recommendations are lacking. We sought to investigate efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulation (NOAC) and vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) in patients undergoing t-TEER. METHODS: Among 78 consecutive patients with t-TEER of severe TR, 69 patients were identified with concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation. Outcomes of these patients treated with NOAC or VKA were compared over a median follow-up period of 327 (177-460) days. RESULTS: Despite elevated thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores (CHA2DS2-VASc 4.2 ± 1.1, HEMORR2HAGES 3.0 ± 1.0 and HAS-BLED 2.1 ± 0.8), only one major bleeding incidence occurred under NOAC therapy. The risk for overall (NOAC 8% vs. VKA group 26%, p = 0.044) and major bleeding events (NOAC 2% vs. VKA 21%, p = 0.010) was significantly lower in the NOAC compared to the VKA group. No significant difference was found between NOAC and VKA treatment in terms of mortality (NOAC 18% vs. VKA 16%, p = 0.865) or the combined endpoint of death, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, embolism, thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and severe bleeding (NOAC 48% vs. VKA 42%, p = 0.801). A comparison between apixaban (n = 27) and rivaroxaban (n = 16) treated patients revealed no significant differences between NOAC substances (all bleeding events apixaban 7% vs. rivaroxaban 13%, p = 0.638). CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that NOACs may offer a favorable risk-benefit profile for patients with concomitant indication for anticoagulation therapy following t-TEER.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in transplant immunology and vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), the longevity of allografts remains hindered by the challenge of allograft rejection. The acute-phase response, an immune-inflammatory reaction to ischemia/reperfusion that occurs directly after allogeneic transplantation, serves as a catalyst for graft rejection. This immune response is orchestrated by acute-phase reactants through intricate crosstalk with the mononuclear phagocyte system. OBJECTIVE: C-reactive protein (CRP), a well-known marker of inflammation, possesses pro-inflammatory properties and exacerbates ischemia/reperfusion injury. Thus, we investigated how CRP impacts acute allograft rejection. METHODS: Prompted by clinical observations in facial VCAs, we employed a complex hindlimb transplantation model in rats to investigate the direct impact of CRP on transplant rejection. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that CRP expedites allograft rejection and diminishes allograft survival by selectively activating non-classical monocytes. Therapeutic stabilization of CRP abrogates this activating effect on monocytes, thereby attenuating acute allograft rejection. Intravital imagining of graft-infiltrating, recipient-derived monocytes during the early phase of acute rejection corroborated their differential regulation by CRP and their pivotal role in driving the initial stages of graft rejection. CONCLUSION: The differential activation of recipient-derived monocytes by CRP exacerbates the innate immune response and accelerates clinical allograft rejection. Thus, therapeutic targeting of CRP represents a novel and promising strategy for preventing acute allograft rejection and potentially mitigating chronic allograft rejection.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Wildtype transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is an under-recognized cause of heart failure in elderly patients. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair is a newly emerging therapeutic option for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We present first insights into safety and possible benefits of this procedure in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients with cardiac non-hereditary (wildtype) transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloidosis and severe to torrential TR, undergoing successful transcatheter tricuspid valve repair, were included in the analysis and compared to a control group of 21 patients without cardiac amyloidosis. All patients presented with an advanced stage of amyloid cardiomyopathy. Primary endpoint was reduction in TR at 3 months follow-up. Secondary endpoints were feasibility, safety, hospitalization or death, clinical improvement, cardiac biomarkers, and structural and functional right heart parameter obtained by echocardiography. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair resulted in a significant reduction of TR (IV to II, P = 0.008) in all eight patients with cardiac amyloidosis (100%). Device success (amyloidosis 75% vs. control group 86%, P = 0.597) and overall probability of hospitalization or death (amyloidosis 13% vs. control group 25%, P = 0.646) were similar compared with those in the control group at 3 months follow-up. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair led to an improvement of New York Heart Association functional class (P = 0.031) and 6 min walking distance (from 313 ± 118 to 337 ± 106, P = 0.012). TR reduction in amyloidosis patients was less extensive compared with that in control group (TR-reduction 1.6 ± 0.3, P = 0.008 vs. control group 2.3 ± 0.3, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, these patients showed no significant improvement of structural right heart parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair is a safe and feasible new treatment option in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy and has the potential to improve TR-grade and clinical status. However, the benefit appears to be less pronounced compared with patients without cardiac amyloidosis.