Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 3(6): 682-8, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16731470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The population of patients likely to respond to selected pacing algorithms for maintenance of sinus rhythm is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify patients with specific onset patterns of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Dual-chamber pacemakers with advanced diagnostic functions were implanted in 112 patients with conventional indications for antibradycardia pacing and a history of paroxysmal AF. Pacemaker diagnostic data were analyzed after 97.5 +/- 40.9 days. According to the frequency of premature atrial contractions (PACs) during the 5 minutes before AF onset, patients were assigned to one of three groups: group A (high PAC activity), group B (moderate PAC activity), or group C (low PAC activity). RESULTS: AF burden was lower in group A (4.6% +/- 2.4%) than group B (15.8% +/- 3.0%, P = .003) and group C (15.5% +/- 3.1%, P = .003). Fewer AF episodes occurred in group A (2.1 +/- 1.3 per day) than group B (3.8 +/- 1.2 per day, P = .006). Mean AF episode duration was shorter in group A (11.4 +/- 10.2 hours) than group C (41.4 +/- 27.5 hours, P = .03). CONCLUSION: The coincidence of low PAC activity before AF onset, high AF burden, and extended arrhythmia episode duration appears to be the consequence of a high atrial substrate factor. In these "substrate fibrillators," the efficacy of pacing algorithms for maintenance of sinus rhythm may be limited. In contrast, "trigger fibrillators" exhibiting low AF burden despite high PAC incidence may represent the target population for specific PAC-suppressing pacing algorithms.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Complejos Atriales Prematuros/diagnóstico , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Diagnóstico por Computador , Marcapaso Artificial , Sistema de Registros , Terapia Asistida por Computador , Anciano , Algoritmos , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Complejos Atriales Prematuros/fisiopatología , Complejos Atriales Prematuros/prevención & control , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 26(1P2): 310-3, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12687835

RESUMEN

Pacing algorithms to prevent PAF are mainly based on the suppression of premature atrial complexes (PACs), which play an important role in its initiation. In contrast to 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms, advanced pacemaker (PM) diagnostic features are capable of recording AF episodes during long follow-up periods and of characterizing AF in a detailed fashion. For the specific use of these algorithms, a detailed characterization of AF was performed in 91 dual chamber PM recipients with histories of AF. Fifteen patients with episodes of oversensing due to far-field signals or frequent episodes of "2:1-undersensing" of atrial flutter were excluded. The remaining 76 patients had high recurrence rates of AF (median 0.8 episodes/day), however, the majority of episodes lasted < 7 minutes. Despite frequent PACs (median 10.8/hour) during sinus rhythm, a median of 66.4% of the AF episodes were preceded by < 2 PACs/min before onset. In conclusion, frequent, short-lived AF episodes seem best suited for AF preventive pacing therapies. However, the small number of PACs preceding many AF episodes may limit the efficacy of PAC suppressing algorithms.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Marcapaso Artificial , Algoritmos , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Electrocardiografía , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA