RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm twins at 5½ years by chorionicity of pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective nationwide population-based EPIPAGE2 (Etude Epidémiologique sur les Petits Âges Gestationnels) cohort study. SETTING: A total of 546 maternity units in France, between March and December 2011. POPULATION: A total of 1126 twins eligible for follow-up at 5½ years. METHODS: The association of chorionicity with outcomes was analysed using multivariate regression models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival at 5½ years with or without neurodevelopmental disabilities (comprising cerebral palsy, visual, hearing, cognitive deficiency, behavioural difficulties or developmental coordination disorders) were described and compared by chorionicity. RESULTS: Among the 1126 twins eligible for follow-up at 5½ years, 926 (82.2%) could be evaluated: 228 monochorionic (MC) and 698 dichorionic (DC). Based on chronicity and gestational age of birth, we found no significant differences for severe neonatal morbidity. The rates of moderate/severe neurobehavioral disabilities were similar in infants from DC pregnancies versus infants from MC pregnancies (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65-2.28). By gestational age and without twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), no difference according to chorionicity was found for all neurodevelopmental outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The neurodevelopmental outcomes among preterm twins at 5½ years is similar, irrespective of chorionicity.
Asunto(s)
Resultado del Embarazo , Gemelos Monocigóticos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Gemelos Dicigóticos , Edad Gestacional , Embarazo Gemelar , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Glioblastoma is one of the most common types of primary brain tumor. In situations of local recurrence, physicians can suggest either specific palliative anticancer treatments (SPAT; surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) or best supportive care (BSC). The objective of the present study was to identify clinical factors that may have influenced the continuation or cessation of SPAT during the final 3 months of life in patients with glioblastoma. In the present retrospective single-center study, all records of patients treated for glioblastoma, who succumbed to the disease between June 2006 and February 2014, were assessed. All selected patients were divided into two groups, according to treatments received during the last 3 months of life: The SPAT and BSC groups. A total of 148 patients were included: 81 patients in the SPAT group (group A) and 67 patients in the BSC group (group B). A performance status equal to 0 was observed for 17.3% of patients in group A vs. 6% in group B. Following progression, chemotherapy was administered in 39.5% of cases in group A vs. 20.9% of cases in group B (P=0.0149). The mean number of lines of chemotherapy administered in group A was equal to 1.44±0.77 as compared with 1.06±0.67 in group B (P=0.0017). SPAT are utilized frequently among patients approaching mortality due to a glioblastoma. Certain factors, including the utilization of novel chemotherapy after the first progression or number of lines of chemotherapy previously administered, may have influenced physicians' decisions whether to continue with the SPAT or not.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Glioblastoma is one of the most frequent primitive brain tumors. Patients who experience tumor relapse after surgery and concomitant radiochemotherapy have a dismal prognosis. The objective of this study is to analyze efficacy data in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression- free survival (PFS) following combination therapy with bevacizumab (BVZ) and irinotecan among patients with relapsed glioblastoma. Safety data will also be reviewed and all results will be compared with data of the literature. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, all records of patients treated with BVZ and irinotecan for a relapsed glioblastoma were analyzed. Each chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 15 days until progression. Magnetic resonance imaging and neurologic examination were repeated every 6 weeks during treatment. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were analyzed. The median number of BVZ-irinotecan cycles was 8 (range 1-38). Median PFS was 26 weeks and median OS was 28 weeks. Eighteen of the 45 patients (40% of cases) had an objective response 6 months after initiation of treatment. Two patients had to discontinue treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the SV1 study are consistent with those found in phase II studies evaluating the same treatment. The irinotecan-BVZ combination is effective in relapsed glioblastoma with acceptable toxicity. Biomarkers predictive of response to BVZ should help in the selection of patients who could benefit from treatment.