RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although the Global Deterioration Scale has been widely used since its publication in 1982, its stages are based on implicit assumptions about the linearity, temporality, and interdependence of cognitive, functional, and behavioral impairment in Alzheimer's disease. The authors evaluated the validity of these assumptions and tested the hypothesis that psychopathology and functional impairment would occur in earlier stages than the Global Deterioration Scale predicts. METHOD: The analyses were based on data on 324 patients with Alzheimer's disease who were selected from a registry of such patients. Data analyses included 1) descriptive statistics on the frequency of psychiatric symptoms and difficulties with activities of daily living and 2) logistic regression, with symptoms and functional impairment as independent variables, to test for significant changes in patients' status between stages of the Global Deterioration Scale. RESULTS: More than 50% of the patients at stage 2 displayed psychopathology, and 32% had two or more symptoms. The significant increase in psychiatric symptoms occurred between stages 3 and 4, not between stages 5 and 6 as predicted by the Global Deterioration Scale. Impairment in functional status was observed at all stages, and significant increases occurred between stages 3 and 4 as well as between stages 5 and 6. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric symptoms and functional impairment occur earlier than predicted by the Global Deterioration Scale, and the rate of change is also different from that specified in the scale. Separate scales to describe cognitive, clinical, and functional status may be the best way to describe the illness until better multidimensional instruments are developed.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Actividades Cotidianas , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/clasificación , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , HumanosRESUMEN
Two experiments tested the hypothesis that positive emotions are processed primarily by the left hemisphere and negative emotions by the right hemisphere. In both experiments, facial expressions of positive and negative emotions were briefly presented to the left and right visual fields of normal dextral subjects. Experiment 1 investigated hemisphere differences in accuracy for naming the emotions, and Experiment 2 examined hemisphere differences in judging the intensity of the emotional expressions. Neither experiment found support for the hypothesized relationship. It was concluded that differential hemisphere involvement in processing positive and negative emotions, as suggested by previous studies, may occur, but only for the production, and not the perception of emotional expressions.