RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The paradoxical association of obesity with mortality, named the "obesity paradox", has been inconsistent, possibly due to a difference between body mass index (BMI) and central obesity, estimated by waist circumference (WC) as patterns of adiposity. SUBJECTS/METHODS: We enrolled 8513 participants from the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study, a multicenter registry that included consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at 18 centers between 2008 and 2017 in Japan. Patients were divided into quartiles in ascending order of the BMI or WC. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death within a year. RESULTS: There were 186 deaths (case fatality rate, 22.1/1000 person-years) during the follow-up period. The lowest group (1st quartile) of BMI or WC had the worst prognosis among the quartiles (1st quartile, 4.2%; 2nd quartile, 1.9%; 3rd quartile, 1.5%; 4th quartile, 1.1%; P < 0.001 (χ2) and 1st quartile, 4.1%; 2nd quartile, 2.3%; 3rd quartile, 1.2%; 4th quartile, 1.5%; P < 0.001 (χ2), respectively). Similar results were obtained for cardiovascular death. In a multivariable analysis adjusted by nine conventional factors, the lowest group (1st quartile) of BMI (hazards ratio, 2.748; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.712-4.411) and WC (hazards ratio, 2.340; 95% CI, 1.525-3.589) were independent prognostic factors for all-cause mortality. By dividing the participants into two groups according to either the BMI or WC based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and World Health Organization classification, the highest mortality was observed in the lower group. However, the C-statistic after adding BMI (quartile) to conventional factors was found to be slightly higher than BMI (two categories) and WC (two categories) (0.735 vs. 0.734). CONCLUSIONS: The obesity paradox was observed in patients after PCI, and single-use of BMI (or WC) was sufficient to predict the prognosis of patients after PCI.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Circunferencia de la CinturaRESUMEN
Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are considered the principal cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide; the effect of stroke-induced cardiac manifestations is well recognized; however, not enough clinical data have been found about the impact of stroke with underlying cardiac disease. This study's objective is to assess the impact of stroke on the prognosis of patients with underlying IHD, who underwent PCI treatment. This was a multicenter, 1-year observational study in patients undergoing PCI in one of the 17 participating centers across Japan. 18,495 patients were registered on the PCI list; 2481 patients had a prior stroke experience, whereas 15,979 were stroke-free. Our study revealed that stroke patients were significantly older (mean age 73.5 ± 9.6, 69.7(± 11.5), respectively), and suffered from more comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, p < 0.0001). During the 1-year period, subjects with stroke showed higher incidence of clinical events compared to those without stroke; to illustrate, all-cause death accounted for 6.2% in patients with stroke, in contrast to only 2.8% in stroke-free patients (p < 0.0001), cardiac death amounted for 2.2 and 1.2%, respectively (p < 0.0001), recurrent stroke for 3.1% and 1.2% (p < 0.0001), non-cardiac death for 3.6 and 1.54% (p < 0.0001), and finally, hemorrhagic complications with 2.6 and 1.3% (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that stroke patients had a higher probability of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and recurrent stroke (log-rank p < 0.0001). Cox hazard analysis also showed that the presence of stroke is a significant indicator in determining the outcome of cardiac death (HR = 1.457, 95% CI 1.036-2.051, p = 0.031); hence, proving it to be a crucial predictor on cardiac prognosis. History of prior stroke was common in PCI patients, and independently associated with a higher rate of subsequent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events recurrence. Thus, highlighting an urgent need for comprehensive prevention of cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Muerte , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) has received increasing attention; however, the epidemiology of ATTR-CM in Japan is not yet understood. In the Kumamoto Cardiac Amyloid Survey, we evaluated the current incidence, clinical characteristics, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for ATTR-CM and compared tafamidis-prescription hospitals with regional hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study. The registry included patients with ATTR-CM diagnosed in two tafamidis-prescription hospital institutes [Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)-certified facilities] and 15 regional cardiovascular facilities in Kumamoto between January 2018 and December 2020. RESULTS: In total, 174 patients were diagnosed with ATTR-CM. The incidence of ATTR-CM was estimated to be approximately 1 per 10,000 person-years in the elderly population (>65 years old) in Kumamoto. Compared with that in the JCS-certified facilities cohort (n=115), age at diagnosis was significantly older (84.5 ± 5.6 vs. 77.5 ± 6.3 years old; p<0.01) in the regional hospitals cohort (n=59). Histological (25% vs. 81%; p<0.01) and genetic diagnosis (7% vs. 82%) were also less frequently performed. Probable (as indicated by positive bone scintigraphy findings with confirmation of monoclonal protein absence) and possible (as indicated by positive bone scintigraphy findings without confirmation of monoclonal protein absence) ATTR-CM accounted for the majority of cases (75% vs. 19%; p<0.01) in the regional hospitals cohort compared to the JCS-certified facilities cohort. There were no cases of hereditary ATTR-CM among the patients who underwent TTR genetic testing (n=98). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the incidence of ATTR-CM in Kumamoto and the diagnostic approach used in patients with ATTR-CM. Further prospective studies with a larger sample are needed to validate our results and to further shed light on the epidemiology of ATTR-CM in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Neuropatías Amiloides Familiares , Cardiomiopatías , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neuropatías Amiloides Familiares/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Amiloides Familiares/epidemiología , Neuropatías Amiloides Familiares/genética , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatías/epidemiología , Cardiomiopatías/genética , Humanos , Incidencia , Prealbúmina/genética , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
AIM: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play critical roles in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This trial was conducted to determine the potential effects of higher-dose rosuvastatin on circulating MMP levels in patients with AMI. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group study. Patients with AMI were randomly assigned to the appropriate-dose group (10 mg rosuvastatin once daily) or the low-dose group (2.5 mg rosuvastatin once daily) within 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were measured on day 1 and at week 4, 12, and 24 after enrollment. The primary endpoint was the change in MMP levels at 24 weeks after enrollment. The secondary endpoints were change in MMP levels at day 1 and weeks 4 and 12 after enrollment. RESULTS: Between August 2017 and October 2018, 120 patients with AMI from 19 institutions were randomly assigned to either the appropriate-dose or the low-dose group. There were 109 patients who completed the 24-week follow-up. The primary endpoint for both MMP-2 and MMP-9 was not significantly different between the two groups. The change in the active/total ratio of MMP-9 at week 12 after baseline was significantly lower in the appropriate-dose group compared with the low-dose group (0.81 [-52.8-60.1]% vs. 70.1 [-14.5-214.2]%, P=0.004), while the changes in MMP-2 were not significantly different between the two groups during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This study could not demonstrate the superiority of appropriate-dose of rosuvastatin in inhibiting serum MMPs levels in patients with AMI.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Metaloproteinasa 2 de la Matriz/sangre , Metaloproteinasa 9 de la Matriz/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly advanced over the last 40 years, but it is not clear whether there have been any changes in prognosis in recent years. The Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study Real-World Registry is a multi-center registry that enrolls consecutive patients undergoing PCI in 17 centers in Kyushu, Japan. To elucidate the clinical impact of recent changes in treatment strategies, 8841 consecutive participants (historical PCI: n = 4038, enrolled between January 2013 and December 2014, and current PCI: n = 4803, between January 2015 and March 2017) with 1-year follow-up data were analyzed. The incidences of major adverse cardiovascular and other clinical events were comparable between historical PCI and current PCI, even though complex lesions were more frequent during the more recent period. During this period, the use of radial approaches, drug eluting stents, and coronary imaging was greater. The use of prasugrel was more frequent (P < 0.001) during the time periods. Comparable event rates were associated with the use of clopidogrel (52.7%) and prasugrel (47.3%). In the sub-analysis for acute coronary syndrome (n = 5047), similar clinical event rates were recorded for historical and current PCI. Although the lesions to be treated are becoming more severe and complex, equivalent clinical outcomes have been maintained in recent years, possibly due to advances in the devices and medication used.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is mainly characterized by the rupture of lipid-rich vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been shown to play a critical role in inflammatory processes underlying plaque rupture. Some reports suggested statins inhibit the increased MMP levels after AMI. However, there are a few comparison studies between the different dosages of the same statin and circulating levels of MMPs. PURPOSE: This study will preliminarily investigate the potential effects of appropriate or low dose of rosuvastatin on circulating MMPs levels in AMI patients. Moreover, we will also obtain plasma from patients while undergoing diagnostic angiography to determine differences in various cardiac sites and peripheral vessels. METHODS: This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study to be conducted to compare the appropriate or low dose of rosuvastatin in the effect on serum levels of inflammatory markers in AMI patients. The eligible patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) will be randomly assigned to receive either appropriate or low-dose rosuvastatin daily using a web-based randomization software within 24h after PCI. The low-dose group will be treated with rosuvastatin 2.5mg once daily with a follow-up. The appropriate-dose group will begin treatment with rosuvastatin 5mg once daily, and the dose of rosuvastatin will be titrated to 10mg within 4 weeks. During administration of the study treatment, subjects will undergo laboratory testing including MMPs and be monitored for the occurrence of adverse events up to 24 weeks. The primary endpoint will be the change rate of MMPs at 24 weeks after administration. CONCLUSIONS: INVITATION will compare the appropriate or low dose of rosuvastatin in the effects on serum levels of inflammatory markers including MMPs in AMI patients. This study will provide significant information on rosuvastatin as an anti-inflammatory agent for AMI.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Metaloproteinasas de la Matriz/sangre , Metaloproteinasas de la Matriz/efectos de los fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The CHADS2 score has mainly been used to predict the likelihood of cerebrovascular accidents in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, increasing attention is being paid to this scoring system for risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the value of the CHADS2 score in predicting cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events in coronary artery disease patients without atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multicenter, observational cohort study. The subjects had been admitted to one of the participating institutions with coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. We calculated the CHADS2 scores for 7082 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; males, 71.9%) without clinical evidence of atrial fibrillation. Subjects were subdivided into low- (0-1), intermediate- (2-3), and high-score (4-6) groups and followed for 1 year. The end point was a composite of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke at 1-year follow-up. Rates of triple-vessel/left main trunk disease correlated positively with CHADS2 score categories. CHADS2 scores among single, double, and triple-vessel/left main trunk groups were 2 (1-2), 2 (1-3), and 2 (2-3), respectively (P<0.001). A total of 194 patients (2.8%) had a cardiovascular/cerebrovascular event, and Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher probability of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events in proportion to a higher CHADS2 score (log-rank test, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis identified CHADS2 score (per 1 point) as an independent predictor of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.47; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study indicated that the CHADS2 score is useful for the prediction of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events in coronary artery disease patients without atrial fibrillation.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Based on the 2011 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guideline, it is recommended that PCI should be performed at hospital with onsite cardiac surgery. But, data suggest that there is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following primary or elective PCI between the two groups. We examined the impact of with or without onsite cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes following PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2008 to March 2011, subjects (n=3241) were enrolled from the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study (KICS). Patients were assigned to two groups treated in hospitals with (n=2764) or without (n=477) onsite cardiac surgery. Clinical events were followed up for 12 months. Primary endpoint was in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. And we monitored in-hospital events, non-cardiovascular deaths, bleeding complications, revascularizations, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There was no overall significant difference in primary endpoint between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery [ACS, 7.6% vs. 8.0%, p=0.737; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 10.4% vs. 7.5%, p=0.200]. There was also no significant difference when events in primary endpoint were considered separately. In other events, revascularization was more frequently seen in hospitals with onsite surgery (ACS, 20.0% vs. 13.0%, p<0.001; STEMI, 21.9% vs. 14.5%, p=0.009). We performed propensity score matching analysis to correct for the disparate patient numbers between the two groups, and there was also no significant difference for primary endpoint (ACS, 8.6% vs. 7.5%, p=0.547; STEMI, 11.2% vs. 7.5%, p=0.210). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following PCI for ACS between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Propensión , Sistema de Registros , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of different statins on the clinical outcomes of Japanese patients with coronary stent implants. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 5,801 consecutive patients (males, 4,160; age, 69.7±11.1 years, mean±SD) who underwent stent implantation between April 2008 and March 2011. They were treated with a strong statin (n=3,042, 52%, atorvastatin, pitavastatin, or rosuvastatin), a regular statin (n=1,082, 19%, pravastatin, simvastatin, or fluvastatin) or no statin (n=1,677, 29%). The patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were divided into mild-to-moderate CKD (30≤eGFR<60, n=1,956) and severe CKD (eGFR <30, n=559). Primary endpoints included cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, including stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke. The clinical outcome for the primary endpoint in mild-to-moderate CKD patients treated with a strong statin (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.81; P=0.005) was significantly lower than in those on no statins, but that in the patients treated with a regular statin was not (P=0.160). The clinical outcome for the primary endpoint in severe CKD patients treated with a strong or regular statin was no different than not being on statin therapy (P=0.446, P=0.194, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD, only strong statins were associated with lower risk compared with no statin, but regular statins were not. It is possible that taking a strong statin from the early stage of CKD is useful for suppression of cardiovascular events.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Stents/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
A 54-year-old man was referred to a local hospital, located about 90 km from our hospital, with cardiogenic shock due to left main coronary artery infarction (LMCA-MI). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed under intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) support, but resulted in insufficient reperfusion and his condition worsened. The helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) rapidly transported the patient to our hospital. After percutaneous cardio-pulmonary support system (PCPS) insertion, PCI could establish the coronary flow. A series of intensive therapies saved the patient. The cooperation of medical and emergency service system following revascularization and intensive care saved the patient with LMCA-MI accompanied by cardiogenic shock.
Asunto(s)
Ambulancias Aéreas , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Angiografía Coronaria , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) on clinical outcomes in Japanese patients who undergo coronary stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1,270 patients (males 915, 69 years) were enrolled and dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and a thienopyridine derivative was prescribed (clopidogrel 630, ticlopidine 640). Patients were divided into 2 groups treated with or without PPI. PPI was administered in 331 cases (26%), and non-PPI in 939 (74%). There were no significant differences in cardiovascular death (PPI vs. non-PPI: 5 vs. 11 cases), nonfatal myocardial infarction (3 vs. 5), and stroke (3 vs. 16) between PPI and non-PPI groups, but the ratio of gastrointestinal events had a higher tendency in non-PPI group compared with PPI group (1 vs. 17, P=0.08). In subgroup analysis of patients taking clopidogrel, or patients with acute coronary syndrome, there was no significant difference in the ratio of cardiovascular events (7 vs. 16, 6 vs. 17, NS). The non-PPI group had a tendency of an increased risk of gastrointestinal events compared with the PPI group (0 vs. 9, P=0.06; 1 vs. 7, P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the negative drug interaction of PPI reported elsewhere, in the present study the intake of PPI was not associated with an increased risk for adverse clinical outcomes in patients treated with stents.